(c) A list of those officers by class and technical category whose performance is judged by the board to have failed to meet the standards required for the efficient conduct of the work of the Foreign Service and who, therefore, are not entitled to receive the regular in-class promotion in accordance with section 625 of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended. The pertinent facts to justify the findings regarding each officer listed shall be set forth in a brief formal statement.

(d) A list of officers by class and category whose performance could not be rated due to illness, recency of appointment, insufficient documentation, etc. The board should cite a specific reason in each instance.

(e) A separate alphabetical listing of officers by class and technical category whose records, qualifications, and expressed desires warrant their consideration for assignment outside of their technical specialty.

(f) If in the course of its review of officer dossiers the board considers that an individual officer's file should more properly be considered by one of the regular selection boards, the case should be referred to the Office of Personnel for appropriate determination.

5. General recommendations.-Having completed all other considerations relative to officers being rated, individual selection boards shall finally prepare general recommendations concerning the policies and procedures to be followed by subsequent boards, including possible comments concerning the adequacy of present methods of measuring and evaluating performance. Boards may make specific recommendations or suggestions with respect to training or assignment regarding any officer or group of officers.

6. Disposition of lists and recommendations.--The lists and recommendations referred to above shall be signed and forwarded as provided in part III of the precepts.

EXHIBIT III

STATISTICS ON CHIEFS OF MISSION (CAREER AND NONCAREER AMBASSADORS) as of

IAEA, Henry DeWolf Smyth (NC).

European Office of the United Nations, Roger W. Tubby (NC).

1 These Ambassadors are not included in the following statistics on chiefs of mission.

Chief of mission positions (see attachment A)

Number of positions----.

106

3

109

6

Career---

Noncareer.

Vacancies..

1 The number of positions varies from the number of posts as 1 chief of mission is accredited to Mauritania-Senegal.

Vacancies

Haiti

Hungary

Panama

Sierra Leone
Yemen
Yugoslavia

No diplomatic relations with Cuba, Red China, or Albania.

FSO-CA

FSO-CM.

FSO-1-

FSO-2

Total_____

Breakdown of career chiefs of mission (see attachment B)

Language ability of Ambassadors

This table indicates, by geographical area, the percentage of Ambassadors who are proficient or better in either the primary or secondary language of the country to which they are assigned. This includes those countries where English is the primary or secondary language.

1 The number of positions varies from the number of posts due to instances where one chief of mission is accredited to 2 or more posts. Present example is Senegal-Mauritania.

The number of positions from Oct. 1, 1950, to Oct. 1, 1959, inclusive, includes oversea missions to which a chief of mission is accredited. This included HICOG from 1949 to 1955; USRO-Paris from 1954 to 1960; Berlin in 1955; and USEC from 1956 to 1960.

The number of chief of mission positions given in 1960, 1961, 1962, and 1963 does not include the 6 special missions-USRO, OECD, USEC, IAEA, USUN (Geneva), ÚSUŇ (New York).

Vacancies as of November 1963 were Haiti, Hungary, Panama, Sierra Leone, Yemen, and Yugoslavia.

Career Chiefs of Mission by grade, (as of November 1, 1963)