The Law of Criminal Conspiracies and Agreements

1807. Claridge v. Hoare.

1808. Roberts.

1809. Pollman.

1809. Stratton.

1809. Teal.

1809. Clifford v. Brandon.

1811. Turner.

1814. Askew.

1814. De Berenger.

1814. Wade v. Broughton. 1816. Pywell.

1816. Brodribb.

1817. Watson.

1818. Kroehl.

1818. Hilbers.

1818. Gill.

1819. Ferguson.

1819. Roberts v. Roberts. 1819. Anon.

1820. The Queen's Case. 1820. King.

1820. Hunt. 1822. Ridgway.

1823. Murray.

1824. Whitehead.

1845. Jacobs.

1846. Gompertz. 1847. Sydserff. 1847. Selsby.

1848. Brittain.

1848. Button. 1848. Lacey. 1849. Wright. 1851. Mears.

1051. Thompson. 1851. Hewitt.

1851. Rowlands.

1851. Duffield.

1852. Whitehouse.

1852. Rycroft.

1852. Read.

1852. Hamp. 1852. Aherne. 1853. Yates.

1853. Lumley v. Gye. 1854. Carlisle.

1856. Hilton v. Eckersley 1856. Bullock.

1857. Stapylton.

1857. Hall.

1858. Timothy.

1858. Esdaile.

1858. Brown.

1858. Bernard.

1859. Absolon.

A List of the English Cases of Conspiracy alphabetically arranged with the References.

Absolon, 1859, 1 F. & F. 498.

Ahearne, 1852, 6 Cox, 6.
Amerideth, 1599, Moore, 562.
Anon. 1350, 24 Edw. 3, p. 75 (99.)
Anon, (27 Edw. 3), 1354, Art. of Inq.,
27 Ass. p. 138 b, pl. 44.

Anon. 1356, 29 Ass. p. 166, pl. 45.
Anon. 1597, 3 Inst. 196.

Anon. 1698, 12 Mod. 248.
Anon. 1819, 1 Chit. Rep. 698.
Armstrong, 1678, 1 Ventr. 304.
Ashley, 1612, Moore, 816; 12 Rep. 91.
Askew, 1814, 3 M. & S. 9.

Bagg, 1616, 11 Rep. 93 b; 1 Roll. Rep. 225.

Bailey, 1867, 10 Cox, 592; 16 L. T. (N. S.) 855, 859.

Ball, 1834, 6 C. & P. 563.

Barry, 1865, 4 F. & F. 389.

Bernard, 1858, 1 F. & F. 240.

De Berenger, 1814, 3 M. & S. 67. Delaval, 1763, 3 Burr. 1434; 1 W. Bl. 410, 439.

Desmond, 1868, 11 Cox, 146.
Dixon, 1834, 6 C. & P. 601.
Druitt, 1867 (see Bailey).
Duffield, 1851 (see Rowlands).
Eccles, 1783, 1 Leach, 274; see also 13
East, 230, n., Willes, Rep. 583, n.
Edwards, 1725, 2 Stra. 707; 1 Sess. Ca.
836; 8 Mod. 320.

Esdaile, 1858 (or Brown), 1 F. & F. 213; 7 Cox. 442.

Farrer v. Close, 1869, L. R., 4 Q. B. 602.

Ferguson, 1819, 2 St. 489.

Floyd v. Barker, 1608, 12 Rep. 23. Ford and Aldridge, 1833, 1 N. & M. 776.

Fowle, 1831, 4 C. & P. 592.

Best, 1705, 2 Ld. Raym. 1167; 1 Salk. Fowler, 1788, 1 East, 461, 462.

174; 6 Mod. 185.

Biers, 1834, 1 A. & E. 327.

Blake, 1844, 6 Q. B. 126.
Blood, 1680, 2 T. Raym. 417.

Bloomfield v. Blake, 1833, 6 C. & P.

75.

Blunt, 1600, 1 St. Tr. 411.

Boulton, 1871, 12 Cox, 87. Brisac, 1803, 4 East, 164. Brittain, 1848, 3 Cox, 76.

Brodribb, 1816, 6 C. & P. 571, n.
Bryan, 1730, 2 Stra. 165.
Brown, 1858 (see Esdaile).
Bullock, 1856, Dears. 653.
Bunn, 1872, "Morning Advertiser," 20
Dec. 1872;
Times," 20 Dec. 1872.
Burch, 1865, 4 F. & F. 407.
Bushell v. Barrett, 1826, Ry. & M. 439.
Button, 1848, 11 Q. B. 929.
Bykerdike, 1832, 1 Moo. & Rob. 179.
Callingwood, 1705, 2 Ld. Raym. 1116.
Carlisle, 1854, Dears. 337.
Chetwynd v. Lindon, 1752, 2, Vesey,

sen. 450.

Claridge v. Hoare, 1807, 14 Ves, 65.
Clifford v. Brandon, 1809, 2 Camp. 358.
Compton, 1783, Cald. 246.
Cooke, 1826, 5 B. & C. 538.
Cope; 1719, 1 Stra. 144.
Daniell, 1701, 6 Mod. 99; 1 Salk. 380.

Frost, 1839, 3 C. & P. 129.
Gill, 1818, 2 B. & A. 204.
Gompertz, 1846, 9 Q. B. 825.

Gray of Groby (Lord), 1607, Moore, 788.

Gregory v. Duke of Brunswick, 1843,
1 C. & K. 24; 6 M. & G. 205.•
Gray (Lord), 1682, 2 St. Tr. 519 (9 St.
Tr. 127).

Grimes, 1688, 3 Mod. 220.
Gurney, 1869, 11 Cox. 414.
Hall, 1857, 1 F. & F. 33.
Hamilton, 1836. 7 C. & P. 448.
Hammond, 1799, 2 Esp. 719.
Hamp. 1852, 6 Cox, 167.
Hardy, 1794, 24 St. Tr. at 438.
Harris, 1842, C. & M. 661, n.
Herbert, 1759, East, P. C. 461.
Hevy, 1782, 2 East, P. C. 858.
Hewitt, 1851, 5 Cox, 162.
Hilbers, 1818, 2 Chit. Rep. 163.
Hilton v. Eckersley, 1856, 6 E. & B.
47; 25 L. J., Q. B. 199, C. Sc.
Hollingbury, 1825, 4 B. & C. 329.
Hornby v. Close, 1867, L. R., 2 Q. B.
153.

Horne Tooke, 1794; 25 St. Tr. at 127.
Howell, 1864, 4 F. & F. 160.
Hudson, 1860, 29 L. J., M. C. 145;
Bell, 263.

Hunt, 1820, 3 B. & A. 566.
Jacobs, 1845, 1 Cox, 173.
Jones, 1832, 4 B. & Ad. 345.
Journeymen Tailors of Cambridge,
1721, 8 Mod. 10.

Kenrick, 1843, 5 Q. B. 49.

Kimberty (see Timberly), 1663.
King 1844, 7 Q. B. 782.

King, 1820, 2 Chit. Rep. 217.

Perham, 1859, 5 H. & N. 30; 29 L.
J., M. C. 31, 33.

Pollman, 1809, 2 Camp. 230.
Poulterers' Case, 1611, 9 Rep. 55;
Moore, 814.

Prisoners' Case, 1793, Hawk. 1, 72, 2.
Pywell, 1816, 1 St. 402.

Queen's Case, 1820, 2 B. & B. 303.
Read, 1852, 6 Cox, 77, n.

Kinnersley and Moore, 1719, 1 Stra. Richardson, 1834, 1 M. & Rob. 402.

193.

Knowlden, 1864, 9 Cox, 483.

Kohn, 1864. 4 F. & F. 68.

Kroehl, 1818, 2 St. 343.

Lacey, 1818, 3 Cox, 522.
Latham, 1864, 9 Cox, 516.

Leigh, 1775, in 1 C. & K. 28, n., &
2 Camp. 372, n; 6 Wentw. Pl. 443.
Levi v. Levi, 1833, 6 C. & P. 239.
Lewis, 1869, 11 Cox, 404.
Locker, 1804, 5 Esp. 107.
Lovelass, 1834, 6 C. & P. 596.
Lumbard's Case, 1369, 43 Ass. 276
(38).

Lumley v. Gye, 1853, 22 L. J., Q. B. at 471.

Maccartey, 1705, 2 Ld. Raym. 1179;
6 Mod. 301; 1 Salk. 286.
Marks, 1802, 3 East, Rep. 157.
Maudsley, 1830, 1 Lew. 51.

Mawbey, 1796, 6 T. R. 619; 4 Wentw.
Pl. 125.

M'Daniel, 1756, Fost. 130; 1 Leach, 44.

Mears, 1851. 2 Den. 79.

Ridgway, 1822, 5 B. & A. 527.

Rispal, 1762, 3 Burr. 1320; 1 W. Bl.

368.

Roberts, 1808, 1 Camp. 399.

Roberts v. Roberts, 1819, 3 B. & A. 367.
Robinson, 1744, 1 Leach. 37.
Rowlands, 1851, 2 Den. 364; 5 Cox,
404, 460; 17 Q. B. 671.
Rycroft, 1852, 6 Cox, 76.
Salter, 1685, 2 Show. 456.
Salter, 1804, 5 Esp. 125.

Saville v. Roberts, 1699; 1 Ld. Raym. 374; 5 Mod. 394, 405; 1 Salk. 13; Carth. 416.

Scarlet, 1613, 13 Rep. 98.
Selsby, 1847, 5 Cox, 495, n.
Serjeant, 1826, 1 R. & M. (N. P.) 352.
Seward, 1834, 1 A. & E. 706.
Shelbourne v. Oliver, 1866, 13 L. T.,
N. S. 630.

Shellard, 1840, 9 C. & P. 277.
Shepherd. 1869, 11 Cox, 325.
Sheriden, 1868, "Leeds Mercury," 13
Aug. 1868.

Skinner, 1867, 10 Cox, 493.

Midwinter v. Scrogg, 1636, in 1 Keb. Spragg, 1760, 2 Burr. 993, 1027.

656.

Mott, 1827, 2 C. & P. 521.

Springhead Co. v. Riley, 1868, L. R., 6
Eq. 551.

Mulcahy, 1868, L. R., 3 E. & I. App. Stapylton, 1857, 8 Cox, 69.

306.

Murphy, 1837, 8 C. & P. 297.

Starling, 1665, 1 Sid. 174; 1 Keb. 650, 655; 1 Lev. 125.

Murray, 1823, 1 Burn's J. (30th ed.), Steel, 1841, 2 Moo. 246.

976.

Niccols; 1745, 2 Stra. 1227.

Nield, 1805, 6 East, 417.

Norris, 1758, 2 Ken. 300.
O'Connell, 1844, 11 Cl. & F. 155.
O'Neill v. Kruger, 1863, 4 B. & S.
389.

O'Neill ". Longman, 1863, 32 L. J., M. C. 259; 9 Cox, 360; 4 B. & S. 376.

Opie, 1671, 1 Wms. 300 l.
Orbell, 1704, 6 Mod. 42.
Parker, 1842; 3 Q. B. 292.

Parkhouse, 1792, 1 East, P. C. 462.
Parsons, 1763, 1 W. Bl. 392.
Pasley v. Freeman, 1789, 3 T. R.
p. 58.

Peck, 1839, 9 A. & E. 686.

Steventon, 1802, 2 East, Rep 462.
Stone, 1796, 6 T. R. 527.

Stratton, 1809. 1 Camp. 549, n.
Sydenham v. Keilaway, 1574, in Cro.
Jac. 8.

Sydserff, 1847, 11 Q. B. 245, Cam. Sc.
Tailor and Towlin, 1629, Godb. 444.
Tanner, 1795, 1 Esp. 304.
Tarrant, 1767, 4 Burr. 2106.
Taylor, 1871, 25 L. T. (N. S.) 75.
Teal, 1809, 11 East, 307.
Thody, 1674, 1 Ventr. 234.
Thomas, 1824, 1 C. & P. 472,
Thompson, 1851, 16 Q. B. 832.
Thorp, 1697, 5 Mod. 221.

Timberley and Childe, 1663 (or Kim

berty), 1 Sid. 68; 1 Lev. 62; 1 Keb. 203. 1 Keb. 254.

Timothy, 1858, 1 F. & F. 39.
Turner, 1811, 13 East, 228.

Vertue. Lord Clive, 1769; 4 Burr.
2472.

Vincent, 1839, 9 C. & P. 91.

Watson, 1817, 2 St. 116.

Wheatley, 1761, 1 Burr. 1127; 1 W.
Bl. 273.

Whitehead, 1824, 1 C. & P. 67.
Whitehouse, 1852, 6 Cox, 38.

Wade v. Broughton, 1814, 3 Ves. & B. Wood v. Bowron, 1866, L. R., 2 Q. B.

172; S. P. I Ves. & B. 292.
Wakefield, 1827, 2 Lew. 1.

Walsby u. Anley, 1861, 3 E. & E. 516;
30 L. J., M. Č. 121.
Warburton, 1870, L. R., 1 C. C. 174.
Ward, 1844, 1 Cox, 101.

21.

Wright, 1849, 14 Q. B. 148.

Yates, 1853, 6 Cox, 441.

Young, 1780 (?), cited in 1788, Lynn, 2 T. R. 733.

Note.

The cases of Lord Grey (1682) and Maccarty (1705) are inserted in these lists of cases because they are cited by East and other writers as cases of conspiracy. But Maccarty's Case is in truth only an example of an indictment for a cheat before the rule was established that private cheats were not indictable at common law (see sup. p. 10). The indictment is set out in 2 Ld. Raym. 1179, and it contains nothing about conspiracy or agreement, but only the word insimul, which is never used to describe conspiracy, but only a joint In Lord Grey's Case the word " conspirantes

crime.

occurs merely by way

of aggravation in one of the inducements, and nothing is said about conspiracy throughout the case except in the recital of the indictment by the counsel who

It is true that there was not in law any

opened it.
The direction of the L. C. J. Pemberton plainly shows that the
crime of adultery. Precedents of indictments against sole defendants for adul-
case was regarded merely as a case of abduction and procurement of the then
tery will be found in Tremayne.
criminal abduction, for the lady was seventeen, and not an heir apparent
had not then been established by Hargrave (on Co. Lit. 88 b).
a ward of court; but the true meaning of guardianship by nature"

nor

Attorney General.

"This case, my lord, is in the nature of a ravishment of

ward, for it is for taking a young lady out of the tuition and custody of her father, who is her guardian by nature."

L. C. J. Pemberton.

mation on the behalf of the king against my Lord Grey and the other de-
fendants; and it doth set forth that my Lord Grey having married one of
the Earl of Berkeley's house, he did unlawfully solicit the Lady Henrietta,
the daughters of the Earl of Berkeley, and having opportunity of coming to
another daughter of the Earl of Berkeley's, a young lady, to unlawful love;
and that he did entice her from her father's house; and that he did cause her
to be conveyed away from thence against her father's consent; and that he did
unlawfully use her company afterwards in a very ill manner; and this, gentle-
men, is the substance of the information; in truth, it is laid, that he did live
in fornication with her.
there was any such unlawful solicitation of this lady's love; and whether there
Now, then, the question before you is, whether
was any inveiglement of her to withdraw herself and run away from her

"Look you, gentlemen of the jury, here is an infor

father's

* *

time frequent her company afterwards."

house without his consent; and whether my Lord Grey did at any

« Anterior Continuar »

Libros