Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

8.

The Interior Department witness before this subcommittee

on September 11, 1981, quoted, with approval and as

an authoritative

source, the 1980 Justice Department's page 89 recital.

We assume,

therefore, that Department will accept the reasoning of Justice

[blocks in formation]

At page 85834 of the Federal Register of Tuesday, December

30, 1980, over the signature of the then Associate Director, BLM, as

the introduction to the appendix to the Federal-Private Cooperative

Coal Leasing Proposal, the readers of that official government

[blocks in formation]

"This country has vast reserves of coal. Its coal
deposits are widely distributed and vary greatly in
quality and value. Much of this coal is privately
owned and with a few notable exceptions, namely certain
concentrated railroad holdings, private ownership is
widely dispersed. The States also own significant
reserves. However, the most significant single owner
of U.S. coal reserves is the United States Government
and most of these reserves are located in the West.

"The 'checkerboard' pattern of ownership occurs in
some of the richest coal fields in the West, such as
the Green River Basin in Wyoming. This pattern may
have a significant effect on the development of U.S.
coal and competition for Federal coal leases. Checker-
boarding occurs where alternate sections of land are
owned by the United States and a private landowner or
corporation, most often a railroad company or its affil-
iates. Coal deposits in many areas of these checker-
board regions underlie a number of sections of land
owned by the government and private parties, making
efficient development of the deposit as a single econ-
omic unit difficult. Unless these coal deposits are
controlled through lease or ownership by a single
operator, the coal deposit may be mined piecemeal in
a manner that is neither efficient nor economical.

owners.

When a coal deposit underlies unleased Federal lands
and adjoining privately owned land, the competitive
interest in the unleased Federal coal may also be
diminished because prospective Federal lessees may
be uncertain of their ability to arrive at satis-
factory contractual agreements with the adjoining
private owner or

Also, the time needed to
bring a Federal lease into production in a checker-
board area may be significantly lengthened by the
extra time needed for assembly. In short, the checker-
board pattern of ownership may constitute a significant
impediment to the mining of coal in the checkerboard,
may reduce the value of any Federal lease to a potential
bidder, and may reduce competition as well. The total
effect may be inefficient mining of the coal, a loss
in the Department's effectiveness in meeting leasing
targets, and a significant reduction in Federal leasing
revenues."

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

ing adopted by both Justice and Interior with respect to anti

competitive aspects inherent in permitting railroads to lease

federal-railroad checkerboarded lands

we urge this subcommittee

to reject repeal of section 2 (c) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920,

as is proposed by s. 1542.

Mr. Lawrence, with his neighbors, stands ready now,

as in

the past, to fully participate in an approach at cooperative leasing of

these checkerboarded areas, with these two qualifications:

First, that the rights and interests of all parties

including the private surface owners of split estate lands

be fully and equitably recognized and reflected in any final

cooperative leasing or pre-leasing plan; and

Second, that the present prohibition of section 2 (c)

-

unqualifiedly construed by Justice to apply to railroads and

their subsidiaries, directly or by joint venture be left as it has been for more than sixty-one years, at least with respect

to checkerboarded lands.

A concluding reminder seems in order: with section 2 (c)

still on the books, and enforced as it was intended to be, the

land grant railroads can still lease their interspersed coal lands

cooperatively, or uncooperatively.

And they will then be assured

of both coal production revenues and substantial haulage revenues

from transporting the coal produced from the checkerboarded areas.

On behalf of my clients and myself, please accept our thanks for the courtesy extended to us by subcommittee members and

the staff.

END

85-444 0

- 81 - 13

Federal Coal Production Regions in the United States: November 9, 1979

[blocks in formation]
[graphic][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]
« AnteriorContinuar »