Repeal of Prohibition of Railroad Ownership of Coal Leases: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, First Session, on S. 1542 ... September 11 and October 1, 1981
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - 508 páginas
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
acres advantage affiliates allow amendment antitrust apply areas authority believe bidding bill Burlington Northern Chairman checkerboard coal companies coal industry coal producers coal slurry committee common carrier compete competition concern conclusion Congress contract corporation cost Department dominate effect Energy existing fact federal coal leases federal leases feet hold important increase interest Interior interpretation involved issue Justice Department land land grant Leasing Act legislative limited major miles million Mineral Mineral Leasing Act mining offer operating ownership percent permit plant position potential Powder River present problems producers prohibition proposed question rail railroad railroad company rates reason Region regulation repeal repeal of Section reserves restriction result Secretary Section 2(c Senator situation slurry pipelines statement tion tons tract transportation Union Pacific United utilities West western coal Wyoming
Página 305 - From and after May first, nineteen hundred and eight, it shall be unlawful for any railroad company to transport from any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia to any other State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, or to any foreign country, any article or commodity, other than timber and the manufactured products thereof, manufactured, mined, or produced by it, or under its authority, or which it may own in whole, or in part, or in which it...
Página 288 - When the carrier at the time of transportation has an interest, direct or indirect, in a legal or equitable sense in the article or commodity, not including, therefore, articles or commodities manufactured, mined, produced or owned, etc., by a bona fide corporation in which the railroad company is a stockholder.
Página 148 - Commission as to whether the transfer of the license would create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
Página 254 - That no company or corporation operating a common carrier railroad shall be given or hold a permit or lease under the provisions of this Act for any coal deposits except for its own use for railroad purposes ; and such limitations of use shall be expressed in all permits and leases issued to such companies or corporations, and no such company or corporation shall receive or hold...
Página 289 - Considering former rulings, it is impossible for us now to declare as matter of law that every company all of whose shares are owned by a holding company necessarily becomes an agent, instrumentality, or department of the latter. Whether such intimate relation exists is a question of fact to be determined upon evidence.
Página 303 - ... under this Act, or which, together with any other interest or interests, as a member of an association or associations or...
Página 118 - Pacific Railroad Company," its successors and assigns, for the purpose of aiding in the construction of said railroad and telegraph line to the Pacific coast, and to secure the safe and speedy transportation of the mails, troops, munitions of war, and public stores over the route of said line of railway...
Página 288 - We then construe the statute as prohibiting a railroad company engaged in interstate commerce from transporting in such commerce articles or commodities under the following circumstances and conditions: a. When the article or commodity has been manufactured, mined or produced by a carrier or under its authority, and at the time of transportation the carrier has not in good faith before the act of transportation dissociated itself from such article or commodity; b. When the carrier owns the article...
Página 290 - It Is the Government's contention that the Elgin decision misconstrued the act, misunderstood its legislative history and misapplied the Court's own prior decisions. It is not necessary in the view we take of the case to decide to what extent, if any, these contentions are correct. It is enough to say that if the Elgin case were before us as a case of first impression, its doctrine might not now be approved. But we do not write on a clean slate.
Página 288 - Any other view of the act will enable the transporting railroad company, by one device or another, to defeat altogether the purpose which Congress had in view, which was to divorce, in a real, substantial sense, production and transportation, and thereby to prevent the transporting company from doing injustice to other owners of coal.