Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton: A Defining Political Debate
Universal-Publishers, 2008 - 136 páginas
The founding of American jurisprudence can be traced to the debates that occurred between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson early in the history of our nation. A Defining Political Debate explores the core tension between the two men over the ability of the judiciary to preserve the core values of republican government. The author takes you through the normative dimensions of the Hamilton and Jefferson debates and provides an analysis of what this means for our current state of affairs.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
actors adopted Alexander Hamilton Alien and Sedition appeal authority Book XI Book XXVIII Carrese chapter Civil Procedure claims are present Code codification movement common law jurisdiction common law system common law tradition conception of law conviction Croswell custom David Dudley Field debate definition of common due process claims Enabling Act Enlightenment federal common law federal judiciary Federalist Papers guidelines Horwitz human nature ideology impact institutions Jackson Jefferson’s opposition Jefferson’s thought judges judicial review jurisprudence justice law and equity legal origin legislative legislature liberty Madison man’s Melinda Gann Hall moderate Montesquieu Morton Horwitz natural law foundation overturn a sentence passions Political Science position principles reason reforms relied Republicans republics result role Roman law Saint Louis Sedition Acts sentencing commissions separation of powers Shklar state’s conception statute Story supra note Supreme Court Table Thomas Jefferson understanding Uniform Commercial Code University Press Wilson Z-Test