Closed Chambers: The First Eyewitness Account of the Epic Struggles Inside the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court of the United States is the most powerful court in the world. It is also the branch of our government most shrouded in mystery, misunderstanding, and myth.. Isolated in a marble temple, supposedly insulated from the pressures of politics, nine unelected Justices are charged with protecting our most cherished rights and shaping our fundamental laws. They are assisted by roughly thirty-six law clerks each year, the best and brightest of the nation's young lawyers, who routinely go on to fill the highest ranks of our government, courts, law schools, and law firms. Never before has one of these clerks stepped forward to reveal how the Court really works--and why it often fails the country and the cause of justice. In this groundbreaking book, award-winning historian Edward Lazarus, a former clerk to Justice Harry A. Blackmun, guides the reader through the Court's inner sanctum, explaining as only an eyewitness can the collisions of law, politics, and personality as the Justices wrestle with the most fiercely disputed issues of our time. Part memoir, past history, and all spellbinding narrative, Closed Chambers provides an intimate portrait and devastating critique--Justice by Justice--of a court at war with itself and in neglect of its constitutional duties. From the conservative Chief Justice Rehnquist's apparent attempt to influence the 1992 election by delaying a crucial abortion case to liberal champion Justice William Brennan's ill-conceived and ultimately self-defeating campaign to sabotage the death penalty, Lazarus's riveting account shows us a Court broken into scheming factions whose members resort to crass political calculations and transparentlyhypocritical arguments as they discard legal principles for bottomline results. The Justices further compound this cliquish antagonism by granting excessive power to immature, ideologically driven clerks, who then use that power to manipulate their bosses and the institution they ostensibly serve. Edward Lazarus took part in the Court's internal battles over the death penalty, affirmative action, abortion, and other momentous issues. Here, he weaves together past and present to show us in astonishing detail not only the tragic failings of the modern Court, but also what led to them, and why they are so devastating for the nation. Unprecedented in its revelations and unparalleled in the brilliance of its analysis, Closed Chambers is the most important book on the Supreme Court in a generation. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 91
Página 173
Still, the confessions were certainly sufficient to sustain robbery and murder
charges against McCleskey and, accordingly, he was placed in the solitary
confinement wing of the Atlanta jail to ponder whether he wanted to plead guilty
or go to ...
Still, the confessions were certainly sufficient to sustain robbery and murder
charges against McCleskey and, accordingly, he was placed in the solitary
confinement wing of the Atlanta jail to ponder whether he wanted to plead guilty
or go to ...
Página 179
Parker started asking McCleskey about conversations in jail where he allegedly
admitted shooting Schlatt. Next, in an exchange that would later cause enormous
controversy, Turner objected on the ground that Parker seemed to be referring ...
Parker started asking McCleskey about conversations in jail where he allegedly
admitted shooting Schlatt. Next, in an exchange that would later cause enormous
controversy, Turner objected on the ground that Parker seemed to be referring ...
Página 497
Forrester ultimately denied McCleskey relief when the evidence to support his
claims against the pardon board chairman proved equivocal. The execution
process resumed its forward march as McCleskey's lawyers frantically appealed.
Forrester ultimately denied McCleskey relief when the evidence to support his
claims against the pardon board chairman proved equivocal. The execution
process resumed its forward march as McCleskey's lawyers frantically appealed.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
CLOSED CHAMBERS: The First Eyewitness Account of the Epic Struggles Inside the Supreme Court
Crítica de los usuarios - KirkusJustice Oliver Wendell Holmes's tart description of Supreme Court deliberations—"nine scorpions in a bottle"—has seldom seemed more apt than in this scathing tell-all screed about the Rehnquist ... Leer comentario completo
LibraryThing Review
Crítica de los usuarios - aevaughn - LibraryThingThis books really got me to thinking. It does give you a good feeling for what went on during the Burger and Rehnquist courts. It mostly consists of a series of chapters on different topics and how ... Leer comentario completo
Contenido
The Highest Court in the Land | 3 |
A Clerks Eye View | 17 |
The Grand Canyon | 47 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 22 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Edward Lazarus Vista de fragmentos - 2005 |
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Edward Lazarus Vista de fragmentos - 1999 |
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Edward Lazarus Sin vista previa disponible - 1999 |
Términos y frases comunes
abolitionist abortion law affirmative action Amendment's appeals argued attorney Baldus's Batson Boger Bork Bork's Burger capital punishment Casey challenge Chambers Chief Justice Circuit civil rights claims clause clerks conference conservative constitutional conviction crime criminal Croson death penalty death sentence decided decision defendant discrimination dissent Douglas draft due process Eighth Amendment equal protection equal protection clause evidence execution federal habeas Fourteenth Amendment Georgia grant cert Griswold Harlan hearing issue joined judges judicial jurors jury Justice Blackmun Justice Brennan Justice Powell Kennedy Kennedy's lawyers LDF's liberal liberty majority Marshall's McCleskey McCleskey's memo ment murder opinion oral argument overruling Roe Patterson political potential Powell Powell's pro-choice prosecutor question race racial Reagan Rehnquist right to abortion right to privacy Robert Bork Roe's rule Runyon Scalia Souter stare decisis state's statute strict scrutiny Supreme Court term Texas Thomas tice tion Tompkins Tompkins's trial trimester vote Warren Webster White