 | 1892 - 554 páginas
...cited for the defendant, Mr. Justice Strong said: " The true rule is that what is the proximate canse of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science, or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances attending." The... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1908 - 604 páginas
...is," said the Supreme Court of the United States, in Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 24 L. Ed. 256, "that what is the proximate cause of an injury is...for the jury. It is not a question of science, or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886 - 682 páginas
...; Hi99ins v. Dewey, 107 id. 494 ; Tent v. The Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co., 49 I11. 340. The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for U,e jury. It is not a question of science or of le9al knowled9e. R is to be determined as a fact, in... | |
 | 1919 - 2026 páginas
...declared by Mr. Justice Strong in Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 474, 24 L. Ed. 256: "The true rule is that what Is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal know-lodge. It Is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 páginas
...relies upon it. 9. SAME— PROXIMATE CAUSE— EXISTENCE OF EVIDENCE— DIRKCTING VERDICT. The question, what is the proximate cause of an injury? is ordinarily a question for the jury. But the burden is always on the plaintiff, in an action for personal injury, to show that the negligence... | |
 | 1895 - 2084 páginas
...Judge. JENKINS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts). Without doubt, whether a given act or omission is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for a jury. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 46Í). This, however, is subject to the well-settled rule that... | |
 | 1892 - 1150 páginas
...decisions were made. And certainly they are in conflict with numerous other decided cases. » * » The true rule is that what is the proximate cause...question for the Jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined ая a fact, In view of the circumstances of fact attending... | |
 | 1908 - 1164 páginas
...cause" Is defined in Milwaukee & St. PR Co. v. Kellogg. 94 US 4G9, 24 L. Ed. 256, and the court said: "The true rule is that what is the proximate cause...an injury is ordinarily a question for the Jury." Measuring the facts as disclosed by the record In this case by the rules of law above referred to,... | |
 | 1913 - 1236 páginas
...38 SB !)5S ; Southern Railway Co. v. Hobbs, 118 Ga. 227, 45 SE 23, 63 LRA 68. It, 11] The question, what is the proximate cause of an injury, is ordinarily a question for the Jury; but the burden is always on the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries, to show that the negligence... | |
| |
The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for the Jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it. 
