P. 13, line 10 from top, dele "peace" and substitute, "Magistrates
acting for the petty sessions division." See page 37.
P. 28. By 12 & 13 Vict. 2. c 110, s. 18, attorneys must sue in the county
courts like other persons.
P. 140, line 10 from bottom, for "an abatement showing," read,
P. 150. The Charitable Trusts' Jurisdiction Bill was withdrawn. See
P. 172, line 11 from top, "cases, p. 16," read "cases, p. 25."
P. 183, line 5, after "admission," add "not."
P. 187, line 11 from top, for "2 Espon," read "2 Espin."
P. 217, line 7 from top, for “ A. r,” reads, “A's;" line 11, for " as,”
read, "was.'
P. 231. The case of Boosey v. Purday, deciding that a foreigner resi-
ding abroad has no copyright in England, is respited in 13 Jurist, p. 918,
P. 238. The act respecting the defective execution of leasing powers,
has been suspended for a time. See vol. 2, N. S.
P. 246, line 3 from bottom, for "held to be exclusive," read "held to
be inclusive.
P. 304, line 2 from top, for "which is will be," &c., read “which will
be, &c.
Abram v Ward, 82
Adams ▼ Adams, 266
Alchin v Hopkins, 118
Aldborough v Trye, 22
Aldridge v Mesner, 192
Alexander v Handy, 192
Alexander v Mc Kenzie, 181
Alexander v Montgomery, 75
Allen v Edmonson, 19
Allen v Hopkins, 130
Allfrey v Allfrey, 135, 136
Alsager v Spalding, 287
Alston v Atlay, 63
Amphlitt v. Parke, 156
Antrobus v Smith, 195
Appleman v Blanche, 251
Arbouin v Anderson, 182
Ashby v White, 75
Ashworth v. Sheppard, 319
Atcheson v Atcheson, 236
Att.-Gen.v Bacchus, 236
Att.-Cen. v Burdett, 189
Att.-Gen. v Lucas, 21
Att.-Gen. v Ludlow, 93
Att.-Gen. v Mangles, 214
Att.-Gen. v Simcox, 214
Att.-Gen. v Stamford, 93
Att.-Gen. Strange, 221
Attwood v Munnings, 181
Aubert v Maze, 311
Austen v Taylor, 279
Autey v Hutchinson, 70
Bagshaw v Bossley, 86, 89
Bagshaw v Spencer, 280
Bailes v Gale, 306
Bailey v Bidwell, 183
Bain v Kirk, 206, 207
Ball v Bruen, 192
Bally v Wells, 301
Barrett v Glubb, 62
Barton v Jayne, 68
Batty v Chester, 291
Bayley v Bradley, 264
Bayley v Meril, 153
Bayliffe v Butter, 77
Beale v Sanders, 124
Begbie v Levi, 145
Beaumont v Brengeri, 146
Bell v Ahearne, 132, 133
Bendry v Price, 116, 118
Bennett v Anderson, 183
Bennett▾ Bernard, 91, 109
Benyon v Nettlefold, 290
Beswick v Copper, 178
Betteley v Buck, 178
Bingham v. Stanley, 182
Bishop v Hatch, 118
Blackborn v Edgely, 84
Blackburn v Smith, 140
Blackburn v Stable, 280
Blake v Phinn, 164
Blomfield v Eyre, 265, 266
Bloxom v Williams, 142, 143, 144,
Bolton v Williams, 81
Boosey v Davidson, 231
Boosey v Purday, 231
Boswell v Dillon, 280
Boultbee v Stubbs, 290
Bowtree v Watson, 21
Bradhurst v Botfield, 159
Bramah v Roberts, 182, 183
Brandon v Aston, 192
Brandon v. Robinson 196
Braybrook v Inskip, 140
Brewster v Kidgell, 301, 302
Bridge v the Grand Junction Railw.
Co. 217, 218
Briscoe v Briscoe, 269
Britten v Wart, 118
Brooker v Cooper, 242
Broughton v Gully, 113
Brown v. Duncan, 311
Brown v Edgington, 129, 153
Brownell v Brownell, 136
Brudenel v Elwes, 266
Bryant v Ikey, 192
Bunn v Guy, 33, 34
Butterfield v Forrester, 209, 217, 218
Byrne v Knipe, 205
Cadley v Mortimer, 4
Cann v Read, 230
Cannan v Bryce 310, 311
Castle v Burdett, 289
Cates v Somerville, 113
Caunt v Thompson, 205
Chanter v Hopkins, 153
Chapman v Gibson, 189
Chesman v Nainby, 29,
Church v Munday, 306, 307
Clay v Jones, 304
Clibborn v Forstall, 292
Clive v Beaumont, 265
Close v Wilberforce, 24
Cockburn v Thompson, 298
Cocks v Purday, 231
Cole v Batcock, 230
Cole v Blake, 244
Colebrook v Layton, 118
Collins v Archer, 113
Collins v Blantern, 309
Collins v Crouch, 164
Colman v Sarrell, 194
Comyns v Boyer, 141
Cook v Seeley, 127, 128
Cope v Rowland, 311
Corry v Bertie, 74
Coombe v Woolfe, 290
Cooper v Harding, 141
Cooper v Norfolk Rail. Co., 110
Corbett v Stonehouse, 124
Cox v Midland Rail. Company, 72
Crawford v Trotter, 268
Croley v Croley, 269
Darlington v Ulph, 164
Davenport v Davenport, 125, 138, 139
Davidson v Bohn, 210
Davidson v Cooper, 75
Davies v Cooper, 22
Dawson v Clark, 155, 156
Deerhurst v St. Albans, 280
Delany v Newman, 182
Delap v Hall, 268
Devaux v I'Anson, 208
Dillon v Coppin, 195, 196,
Dillon v Cruise, 91, 93
Faikney v Reynous, 311
Faircloth v Gurney, 81, 118
Fearon v Norvall, 69, 151
Feldes v Hooker, 164
Fell v Bond, 223
Fennell v Ridler, 141, 142, 145
Fennell v Ridler, 144
Fergusson v Norman, 310, 312
Fitch v Rochfort, 152, 316
Fitzgerald v Fauconberge, 75
Fletcher v Sondes, 87, 88, 89, 91
Flight v Bentley, 23, 24
Flight v Salter, 116
Flint v Le Mesurier, 208
Flint v Warren, 156, 157
Flower v Adams, 217
Foley v Addenbrooke, 159
Follett v Hoppe, 79
Ford v Noll, 245
Fox v Chester, 59, 61, 62, 63
Foancis v Grover, 92
Frankcombe v Hayward, 166
Friar v Gray, 3
Furze v Sharwood,
Garrod v Olley, 165
Gas Light and Coke Co. v Turner
Heath v Chadwicke, 68
Heath v Sansom, 181
Hely v Hicks, 287
Henson v Blackwell, 133, 134
Hepwell v Knight, 237
Heskett v Grey, 85
Higham v Paddeley, 244
Hill v St. John, 75
Hillier v Laurie, 242
Hinde v Gray, 33
Hirst v Tolson, 233
Hitchcock v Coker, 29, 34, 35
Hobson v Burns, 184
Hockley v Mawbey, 268, 269
Hodgson v Merest, 83
Holloway v Heddington, 194, 196
Holmes v Buckley, 301
Hope v Clifden, 212
Hopkinson v Lee, 159
Horner v Graves, 31, 34
Howard v Shaw, 182, 183
Howgrave v Cartier, 212
Hughes v Kelly, 92
Humphreys v Arabin, 133, 134
Hunlocke v Blacklow, 33
Hunt v Bateman, 91, 92
Huntley v Grant, 288
Huntley v Russell, 288
Hutton ▾ Mayne, 292
Jeffery v Jeffery, 212
Jeffries v Peart, 27
Jenkins v Morris, 132
Jervoise v Northumberland, 280
Jesson v Wright, 269
Johnson v Brazier, 118
Jones v Bright, 153
Jones v Brown, 24
Jones v Hill, 124
Jones v Jones, 23, 139
Jones v Morgan, 280
Jones v Owen, 122
Jones v Saye, 112
Jones v Smith, 230
Jones v King, 3
Jordon v Norton, 265
Kayev Fosbrooke, 67, 68
Kearsley v Woodcock, 192
Kelly v Bodkin, 109
Kennedy v Stewart, 302
Kershaw v Bailey, 209, 210
Keymer v Laurie, 180
King v Bickley, 205
King v Hamlet, 319
King v Willson, 78
Kingsley v Bolton, 193
Kinnersly v Knott, 250, 251
Kircudbright v Kircudbright, 89
Kirkman v Booth, 158, 210
Kirlew v Butts, 118
Knight v Clements, 104
Knight v Knight, 297
Knight v Majoribanks, 134, 135
Knox v Kelly, 91, 92
Knox v Wood, 208
Lack v Seward, 217
Laing v Meader, 244
Langton v Hughes, 312
Laugher v Pointer, 107
Lazarus v Cowell, 18
Leak v Babington, 62
Legh v Lewis, 86
Leslie v Pounds, 107
Lester v Garland, 289
Levy v Lindo, 237
Levy v Wilkes, 251
Lewes v Lewes, 196
Lewin v Guest, 140
Lewis v Armstrong, 310
Lewis v Davidson, 310
Lewis v Hance, 24
Maguire v Scully, 281
Mallan v May, 29, 35
Mapp v Eleock, 155
Marriott v Stanley, 217
Martin v Gilham, 124
Mayther v Thomas, 163
Meek v Kettlewell, 196
Melen v Andrews, 232
Merest v James, 270
Metcalf v York, 113, 115
Miers v Brown, 206
Miller v Craig, 136
Miller v Green, 294
Miller v Hay, 251, 252
Miller v Wane, 208
Mills v Barber, 181
Milnes v Branch, 302
Mirehouse v Bennett, 59
Mitchell v Foster, 289
Mitchell v Reynolds, 29, 33
Mollett v Wackerborth, 76
Monkton v Att.-Gen. 132
Moody v Hibberd, 81
Newland v Watkins, 117, 118
Newton v Hunt, 21
Newton v Scott, 256
Nicholls v Stretton, 29, 30, 32, 36
Nicholson v Trotter, 317
Nind v Rhodes, 27
Nokes v Kilmorey, 237
Neill v Fitzgerald, 100
Onslow v Horne, 208
Orgill v Stinson, 178
Orme v Young, 607
Ormond v Huth, 131
Oswald v Thompson, 190
Parker v Crouch, 27
Parkinson v Lee, 129
Parrott v Congreve, 190
Partridge v Whiston, 89
Paxton v Popham, 311
Peacock v Peacock, 211
Peate v Dicken, 141
Peele v Carlisle, 85
Pemberton v Colls, 208, 209
Pemberton v Vaughan, 77
Penley v Watts, 1
Pennell v Attenborough, 317
Pennell v Rhodes, 79
Penny v Watts, 187, 188
Perfect v Curzon, 212
Petrie v Bury, 159
Pidgeley v Pidgeley, 166
Piggot v Penrice, 189
Pilkington v Scott, 29, 31, 32
Pitt v Jackson, 266
Pollock v Stables, 77
Pous v Gilham, 192
Porter v Sheppard, 3
Powis v Burdett, 212
Pomfret v Ricroft, 125
Preston v Wilson, 67, 68
Prince Albert v Strange, 73,220
Procter v Sargeant, 33
Prole v Wiggins, 309
Pulvertoft v Pulvertoft, 194
Purdew v Jackson, 219, 220
Reed v Lucas, 22
Red v Madden, 9
Reed v Shrubsole, 150, 178
Reed v Ward, 17
|