THE REBELLION IN THE UNITED STATES; OR, THE WAR OF 1861 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 36
Página vi
... .85 Seizure of the slaver Bonita, • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * to e s to e o '
o e o e o e o e o e o e o 'o ... 37 Senator Benjamin's great secession speech in
the United States Senate, . .38 Senator Baker, of Oregon, replies to Senator
Benjamin, .
... .85 Seizure of the slaver Bonita, • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * to e s to e o '
o e o e o e o e o e o e o 'o ... 37 Senator Benjamin's great secession speech in
the United States Senate, . .38 Senator Baker, of Oregon, replies to Senator
Benjamin, .
Página 16
... answered to his name on roll-call in the House. But no senators were present
from South Carolina, Georgia, or Louisiana, -the South Carolina Senators,
Chesnut and Hammond, having resigned their seats in the Senate, the former on
the ...
... answered to his name on roll-call in the House. But no senators were present
from South Carolina, Georgia, or Louisiana, -the South Carolina Senators,
Chesnut and Hammond, having resigned their seats in the Senate, the former on
the ...
Página 17
Its reading was listened to with the most profound attention, yet it did not satisfy
the South, nor please the North ; it was attacked fiercely in the Senate by
Clingman, of North Carolina, and defended by Crittenden, of Kentucky. Southern
senators ...
Its reading was listened to with the most profound attention, yet it did not satisfy
the South, nor please the North ; it was attacked fiercely in the Senate by
Clingman, of North Carolina, and defended by Crittenden, of Kentucky. Southern
senators ...
Página 18
The United States Senate, December 4th, was characterized by the most exciting
speeches of Southern senators, looking to secession as their only relief from
Northern domination. In the House, on the Question of referring the secession ...
The United States Senate, December 4th, was characterized by the most exciting
speeches of Southern senators, looking to secession as their only relief from
Northern domination. In the House, on the Question of referring the secession ...
Página 27
On the 18th of December, Senator Crittenden, of Kentucky, introduced into the
United States Senate resolutions of compromise, as a settlement of differences
between the Slave and Free States. The bill, as introduced, proposed to renew
the ...
On the 18th of December, Senator Crittenden, of Kentucky, introduced into the
United States Senate resolutions of compromise, as a settlement of differences
between the Slave and Free States. The bill, as introduced, proposed to renew
the ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action adopted appointed arms arrived arsenal artillery assembled authorities Baltimore banks bill called cause Charleston cheers citizens command commissioners companies Congress Constitution convention crowd December duty election enter excitement existing expressed federal feeling fired five flag force four friends Georgia give Governor guns Hall hands held honor hope hour House hundred immediately immense inaugural Island January John land legislature liberty Lincoln Major Anderson March Massachusetts meeting ment military morning Moultrie never night North Northern o'clock officers party passed peace preparations present President procession question received Regiment resigned says secession Secretary Senate sent session ship side slave soldiers soon South Carolina Southern speech stand stars streets Sumter surrendered Texas thousand tion took train troops Union United Virginia Washington York
Pasajes populares
Página 61 - Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people? Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
Página 55 - That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively...
Página 62 - I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect and defend" it. I am loth to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
Página 54 - I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
Página 60 - This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.
Página 60 - Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other, nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced, and go out of the presence, and beyond the reach of each other; but the different parts of our country cannot do this.
Página 60 - They cannot but remain face to face, and intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before? Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
Página 62 - Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity and a firm reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored land, are still competent to adjust, in the best way, all our present difficulty. In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war.
Página 59 - One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute.
Página 57 - Again, if the United States be not a Government proper, but an association of States in the nature of a contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it. One party to a contract may violate it — break it, so to speak — but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?