The Central Law Journal, Volumen73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 1
... seem to bear wit- ness , as the distinguished jurist quotes with approval from Senator Nelson , a very dis- tinguished ... seems incapable of anything like uniformity in enforcement — at least not until the supreme court , after much ...
... seem to bear wit- ness , as the distinguished jurist quotes with approval from Senator Nelson , a very dis- tinguished ... seems incapable of anything like uniformity in enforcement — at least not until the supreme court , after much ...
Página 2
... seems to us , that the very last tribunal , in which a contention would raise its head that uncertainty in the description of a penal offense is no objection to its being brought to bar , with any show of success , is a federal court ...
... seems to us , that the very last tribunal , in which a contention would raise its head that uncertainty in the description of a penal offense is no objection to its being brought to bar , with any show of success , is a federal court ...
Página 4
... seems just as truly contempt of remedial process as to disobey it negatively . For ex- ample the court in this case , it seems to us , might at least have imprisoned defendants un- til they ceased publishing the complainant as being on ...
... seems just as truly contempt of remedial process as to disobey it negatively . For ex- ample the court in this case , it seems to us , might at least have imprisoned defendants un- til they ceased publishing the complainant as being on ...
Página 12
... seems to be with the prin- cipal case in distinguishing between a willfully wrong conversion and one under claim of right , but it seems to us that property of fluctuating character , so far as value is concerned is not a good basis ...
... seems to be with the prin- cipal case in distinguishing between a willfully wrong conversion and one under claim of right , but it seems to us that property of fluctuating character , so far as value is concerned is not a good basis ...
Página 13
... seems to us too restricted , but as a rule it would seem to be enforceable without regard to the circumstances attending the con- version , just because of that nature . As to other property , though it might fluctuate , that would seem ...
... seems to us too restricted , but as a rule it would seem to be enforceable without regard to the circumstances attending the con- version , just because of that nature . As to other property , though it might fluctuate , that would seem ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Pasajes populares
Página 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Página 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Página 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Página 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Página 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Página 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Página 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Página 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Página 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Página 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.