The Central Law Journal, Volumen73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 8
... question that arises is , has the carrier any right to limit its liability by contract for a valuable consideration ? Limitation of liability divides itself into two heads : First : Limitation as to the place where the negligence occurs ...
... question that arises is , has the carrier any right to limit its liability by contract for a valuable consideration ? Limitation of liability divides itself into two heads : First : Limitation as to the place where the negligence occurs ...
Página 9
... question here involved , but other questions arising under the Act , and therefor their weight on this point is open to serious question.35 The carrier , also , by contract may stipu- late that the shipper shall give notice with- in a ...
... question here involved , but other questions arising under the Act , and therefor their weight on this point is open to serious question.35 The carrier , also , by contract may stipu- late that the shipper shall give notice with- in a ...
Página 12
... question was also raised by objection to evidence of the highest market value and by an exception to that portion of the charge of the court , which fixed the highest market value , without interest , as the measure of dam- ages to ...
... question was also raised by objection to evidence of the highest market value and by an exception to that portion of the charge of the court , which fixed the highest market value , without interest , as the measure of dam- ages to ...
Página 26
... question of opinion , whereas the question whether a particular transaction is " injuri- ous " is a question of fact . The word " un- due " is also like the word " unreasonable , " in being representative of an opinion and not ...
... question of opinion , whereas the question whether a particular transaction is " injuri- ous " is a question of fact . The word " un- due " is also like the word " unreasonable , " in being representative of an opinion and not ...
Página 31
... question of fact , the court said : " But wheth- er the officer acted in excess of his legal author- ity in what he did , including the shooting of Demps Martin , was the question to be tried . " This case reviews prior Kentucky cases ...
... question of fact , the court said : " But wheth- er the officer acted in excess of his legal author- ity in what he did , including the shooting of Demps Martin , was the question to be tried . " This case reviews prior Kentucky cases ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Pasajes populares
Página 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Página 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Página 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Página 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Página 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Página 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Página 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Página 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Página 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Página 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.