The Central Law Journal, Volumen73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 11
... owner of the benefit of a rise in price . It is to enable them to adjust their assessment of damages to such varying situations that the jury is accorded a discretionary power in this mat- ter . The right to exercise such discretion was ...
... owner of the benefit of a rise in price . It is to enable them to adjust their assessment of damages to such varying situations that the jury is accorded a discretionary power in this mat- ter . The right to exercise such discretion was ...
Página 12
... owner has proceeded promptly to sue instead of laying by and speculating upon the possibility of a still higher price . It must have been on this theory that a Mon- tana statute gives , in trover and conversion " to the injured party ...
... owner has proceeded promptly to sue instead of laying by and speculating upon the possibility of a still higher price . It must have been on this theory that a Mon- tana statute gives , in trover and conversion " to the injured party ...
Página 17
... owner of a horse injured in a livery stable that for a long time it had been kept in a certain stall did not estop ... owners of land are not parties to a foreclosure suit against it , they are not concluded by the judg- ment . - Hayes v ...
... owner of a horse injured in a livery stable that for a long time it had been kept in a certain stall did not estop ... owners of land are not parties to a foreclosure suit against it , they are not concluded by the judg- ment . - Hayes v ...
Página 18
... owner . - Town of Hemp- stead v . Lawrence , 127 N. Y. Supp . 949 . 106. Negligence - Evidence . - Where an act ... owners locating on public land and residing thereon when they were opened to public settlement held to have a claim to ...
... owner . - Town of Hemp- stead v . Lawrence , 127 N. Y. Supp . 949 . 106. Negligence - Evidence . - Where an act ... owners locating on public land and residing thereon when they were opened to public settlement held to have a claim to ...
Página 27
... therefore never falls within the unlimited statutory phrase " restraint of trade " as that phrase is used in section I of the Sherman law . But in such cases when the corporation or owner of Vol . 73 27 CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL .
... therefore never falls within the unlimited statutory phrase " restraint of trade " as that phrase is used in section I of the Sherman law . But in such cases when the corporation or owner of Vol . 73 27 CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL .
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Pasajes populares
Página 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Página 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Página 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Página 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Página 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Página 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Página 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Página 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Página 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Página 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.