The Central Law Journal, Volumen73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 2
... defendant became cured of his habit after he had been addicted to it for the statutory period and the suit had been commenced be permitted to defeat the plain- tiff's suit , there having been no condonation within the meaning of the law ...
... defendant became cured of his habit after he had been addicted to it for the statutory period and the suit had been commenced be permitted to defeat the plain- tiff's suit , there having been no condonation within the meaning of the law ...
Página 3
... defendant is presumed to be in- nocent , he must be proved to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt , and cannot be compelled to testify against himself . " In this case each of the defendants was made a witness for the Stove and Range ...
... defendant is presumed to be in- nocent , he must be proved to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt , and cannot be compelled to testify against himself . " In this case each of the defendants was made a witness for the Stove and Range ...
Página 10
... defendant to the Albertville Mercan- tile Company , the said company called on the defendant , J. J. Henderson , from whom they bought said bale of cotton , to defend his title or claim to said cotton for them ; and this defendant ...
... defendant to the Albertville Mercan- tile Company , the said company called on the defendant , J. J. Henderson , from whom they bought said bale of cotton , to defend his title or claim to said cotton for them ; and this defendant ...
Página 11
... defendant under the law and evi- dence offered by the party , which judg- ment is duly rendered upon the merits of the case , and no appeal was taken from said judgment ; and the defendant says that plaintiff is bound or concluded by ...
... defendant under the law and evi- dence offered by the party , which judg- ment is duly rendered upon the merits of the case , and no appeal was taken from said judgment ; and the defendant says that plaintiff is bound or concluded by ...
Página 12
... defendant from his wrongful act . " That sort of rule ought , it seems to us , to demand the high- est subsequent value , but the principal case argues that the jury have a discretion within the limits of market value at the time of con ...
... defendant from his wrongful act . " That sort of rule ought , it seems to us , to demand the high- est subsequent value , but the principal case argues that the jury have a discretion within the limits of market value at the time of con ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Pasajes populares
Página 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Página 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Página 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Página 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Página 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Página 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Página 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Página 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Página 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Página 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.