Court decisions-Continued.

Henkel v. United States, 237 U. S. 43, 59 L. Ed. 831, 35 Sup. Ct. 536,
affirming 196 Fed. 345, 116 C. C. A. 165--

Hewes v. All Persons et al., Charles Malan v. Imperial Irrigation
District---

Page

53

34, 46, 379

Hillcrest Irr. Dist. v. Brose, 24 Ida. 376, 133 Pac. 663–
Horstmann Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 66 L. Ed. 171, 42 Sup.
Ct. 58; 54 Ct. Cl. 214 affirmed..

Ide v. United States, 263 U. S. 497, 68 L. Ed. 407, 44 Sup. Ct. 182,
affirming U. S. v. Ide, 277 Fed. 373_

Imperial Water Co. v. Holabird, receiver California Development Co.,
197 Fed. 4, 116 C. C. A. 526.

Irwin v. Wright, 42 Sup. Ct. 293, 258 U. S. 219, 66 L. Ed. 573..

Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 1-22_

Johnson v. Warm Springs Irrigation District, 246 Pac. 527-
Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 13 Fed. 106---
Kansas v. Colorado__

Klamath County v. Colonial Realty Co., 7 Pac. (2d) 976_.
Knudson v. Omanson, 10 Utah 124, 37 Pac. 250_

11, 127

55

4, 60

59

49.

112, 137, 146, 211

189

312

22

61

46, 129

99

Lambye v. Garcia, 157 Pac. 977-_-

Lehi City v. Meiling, City Recorder, 48 Pac. (2d) 530_

Ley & Co. v. United States, 273 U. S. 386__.

Lincoln Land Co. v. Goshen Irr. Dist., 293 Pac. 373_

61

529

380

266, 268

Loney v. Scott, 57 Or. 378, 112 Pac. 172.

Malan, Chas., v. Imperial Irrigation District_

McLaren v. Fleischer, 185 Pac. 967; certiorari granted, 40 Sup. Ct. 482,
253 U. S. 479, 64 L. Ed. 1023_

McLean v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, 245 Pac. 285_.

Magruder v. Belle Fourche Valley Water Users' Association, 219 Fed.
72, 133 C. C. A. 524____

25

46, 379

31

128

11, 48

Malone v. El Paso Co. Water Improvement District No. 1, 20 S. W.
(2d) 815___

Marsters et al. v. United States, 236 Fed. 663_
Michaelson v. Miller (1933), 26 Pac. (2d) 378-

Minidoka Irrigation District v. Wilbur, 1931, 50 Fed. (2) 495, cer-
tiorari denied, 284 U. S. 634__

130

Minidoka Railway Co. v. United States, 235 U. S. 211, 59 L. Ed. 200,
35 Sup. Ct. 46, reversing 190 Fed. 491 and affirming 176 Fed. 762__
Minidoka Railway Co. v. Weymouth, 19 Ida. 234, 113 Pac. 455.
Mosher v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, 209 Pac. 596_
Moody v. Johnston, 66 Fed. (2d) 999__.

5, 28

5, 28

59

48-49

Moore v. Anderson, 68 Fed. (2d) 191, certiorari denied October 8,
1934, 293 U. S. 567__.

52

Mower v. Bond, 8 Fed. (2d) 518_

154, 280

Mullen Benevolent Corporation v. United States and Mullen Invest-
ment Co. v. United States, 63 Fed. (2d) 48, 56, certiorari granted
May 29, 1933, judgment affirmed November 6, 1933 (290 U. S. 89)-- 56-57
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, memorandum decision, June 26,
1918___

61

150, 152

Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District v. Bond, 268 U. S. 50, 45 Sup. Ct.
383, 69 L. Ed. 843; 283 Fed. 569, 288 Fed. 541 affirmed.
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District v. Petrie, 153 Pac. 425; idem,
223 Pac. 531; 37 Ida. 45__

Natron Soda Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 66 L. Ed.

11, 126–127
171, 42

Sup. Ct. 58; 54 Ct. Cl. 169 and 55 Ct. Cl. 66 affirmed....

New York Trust Co. v. Farmers Irrigation District, 280 Fed. 785-
Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Mitchell, 208 Fed. 469.
North Side Canal Co. v. State of Wyoming, 8 Fed. (2d) 739; 17 Fed.
(2d) 55; certiorari denied, 47 Sup. Ct. 586; 274 U. S. 740.
North Side Canal Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co., 12 Fed. (2d) 311.
Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 283
Pac. 614

Court decisions-Continued.

Page

Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, 217 Pac. 935__
Pacific Coast Construction Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cl. 582_.
Page and Brinton v. United States, 56 Ct. Cl. 176_.
Payette-Boise Water Users' Association v. Bond, 269 Fed. 159_-
Payette-Boise Water Users' Association v. Cole, 263 Fed. 734---- 37, 40, 152
Payne v. Central Pac. R. Co., 255 U. S., 228–
Payne v. State of New Mexico, 255 U. S. 367-

52

42

35, 42

--

41

27

27

Peters v. National Surety Co., 166 N. W. 43, 167 Wis. 131; rehearing
denied 166 N. W. 1087, 167 Wis. 131__

35

Pioneer Irrigation District v. American Ditch Association, 1 Pac.
(2d) 196, 52 Ida., 732.

58

Pioneer Irrigation District v. Stone, 23 Ida. 344; 130 Pac. 382__ 11, 126–127
Ramshorn Ditch Co. v. United States, 269 Fed. 80, affirming U. S. v.
Ramshorn Ditch Co., 254 Fed. 842.

60, 127

Robinson & Son v. United States, 53 Ct. Cl. 536_--

42

Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. Spicer, 236 Pac. 728--
Saylor v. Gray, 20 Pac. (2d) 441__.

52

38

Shoshone Irrigation District v. Harold L. Ickes, 70 Fed. (2d) 771,
certiorari denied October 8, 1934 (293 U. S. 571).
Shoshone Irr. Dist. v. Lincoln Land Co., Memo dec..

Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District, 229 N. W. 273, appeal to Sup.
Ct. denied Apr. 20, 1930__

Sperry v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District, 270 Pac. 889_.
Stanfield v. Umatilla R. Water Users' Association, 192 Fed. 596-
Steacy-Schmidt Mfg. Co. v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 499___.
Sunnyside Irrigation District, Moore v. Anderson, 68 Fed. (2d) 191,
certiorari denied October 8, 1934, 293 U. S. 567.

Smith v. Dickerson, 297 Pac. 402__

Suspension of construction charges, Chinook Div.
Swigart v. Baker, 229 U. S. 187, 57 L. Ed. 1143, 33 Sup. Ct. 645, re-
versing 199 Fed. 865, 118 C. C. A. 313, and affirming Baker v.
Swigart, 196 Fed. 569_

450

12, 43, 51

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Amer. Falls Res. Dist. No. 2, 45 Fed. (2d)
649
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2
(D. C., Idaho, 1931), 49 Fed. (2d) 632. Affirmed (C. C. A., 9th Cir.
1932) 59 Fed. (2d) 19. October 17, 1932, petition for writ of cer-
tiorari to C. C. A. for 9th Cir. denied, 287 U. S. 638_
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Foote, 192 Fed. 583-

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Teton Co.---

425

52

12, 18

50

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Wyoming, manuscript decision_
Umatilla Water Users' Association v. Irvin, 108 Pac. 1016_.
United States v. Arizona, 295 U. S. 174_.

United States v. Bennett, 207 Fed. 524, 125 C. C. A. 186_

50

43

529

60

United States v. Bridgeport Irrigation District, 40 Fed. (2d) 827;
petition for certiorari to Sup. Ct. denied, 282 U. S. XV.

United States v. Brown, 279 Fed. 168; affirmed to Brown v. U. S., 263
U. S. 78, 68 L. Ed. 171, 44 Sup. Ct. 92-

United States v. Buchanan, 232 U. S. 76, 58 L. Ed. 514, 34 Sup. Ct. 237
United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 34 Sup. Ct. 840, 234 U. S. 228, 58
L. Ed. 1290; 193 Fed. 905 affirmed___

United States v. Bunting, 206 Fed. 340_-

127

54, 256

28

34

43

United States v. Burley, 172 Fed. 615; affirmed Burley v. U. S., 179
Fed. 1, 102 C. C. A. 429, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 807_-

11, 35-36, 54, 72

United States v. Cantrall, 176 Fed. 949_

United States v. Canyon Co., 232 Fed. 985--

43, 51
49, 137

United States v. Conrad Investment Co. (C. C. Mont.) 156 Fed. 124;
affirmed 161 Fed. 829; 88 C. C. A. 647-.

United States v. Gratiot, 14 Pet. 526, 10 L. Ed. 573, 13 U. S. 644_
United States v. Griffith, 2 Fed. (2d) 925--.

13

205

Court decisions-Continued.

United States v. Hanson, 167 Fed. 881, 93 C. C. A. 371
United States v. Ide, 277 Fed. 373; affirmed in Ide v. U. S. 263.
U. S. 497, 68 L. Ed. 407, 44 Sup. Ct. 182_
United States v. Mason & Hangar Co., 260 U. S. 323.
United States v. Minidoka R. Co. (Ida.), 176 Fed. 762; reversed in
190 Fed. 491; affirmed in 235 U. S. 211, 59 L. Ed. 200, 35 Sup. Ct. 46
United States v. O'Neill, 198 Fed. 677....
United States v. Parkins, 18 Fed. (2d) 643_

Page

11, 21, 24, 88

4, 60
380

5, 28

United States v. Ramshorn Ditch Co., 254 Fed. 842; affirmed in Rams-
horn Ditch Co. v. U. S., 269 Fed. 80_.

60, 127

United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co., 174 U. S. 690;
184 U. S. 416; 215 U. S. 266.

United States v. Rogers, 41 Sup. Ct. 281, 255 U. S. 163, 65 L. Ed.
566, affirming 257 Fed. 397--

United States v. Schechter Poultry Co., 295 U. S. 495.

United States v. Schodde, Custer & Nelson, 1394, U. S. C. A., 9th Cir-
cuit__.

57-58

United States v. Union Gap Irrigation Co., 209 Fed. 274....
United States v. Union Gap Irrigation Co., 39 Fed. (2d) 46_.
United States v. Van Horn, 197 Fed. 611.

3, 4, 5, 6

United States v. Wade (unpublished manuscript dec.).
United States v. Weisberger, 206 Fed. 641----

United States v. West Side Irrigation Co., 230 Fed. 284; affirmed West
Side Irrigation Co. v. U. S., 246 Fed. 212, 158 C. C. A. 372-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cls.
561

54

34

Verde River Irrigation & Power District v. Work, 24 Fed. (2d), 886;
certiorari denied, 279 U. S. 854_.

127

25

Verde Water & Power Co. v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Asso-
ciation, 197 Pac. 227; certiorari denied, 257 U. S. 643.
Washoe County Water Conservation District v. Beemer, 45 Fed. (2) –

779-
785, 529

West Side Irrigation Co. v. United States, 246 Fed. 212, 158 C. C. A.
372, affirming U. S. v. West Side Irrigation Co., 230 Fed. 284_
Whiffiin v. Cole, memorandum decision (Boise), 264 Fed. 252.
Wilbur v. Burley Irrigation District, 58 Fed. (2d) 871----
Wilbur v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 50 Fed. (2d) 495, certiorari
denied, 284 U. S. 634.

Wood v. Canyon County, 253 Pac. 839_
Work v. Mason, 6 Fed. (2d) 474_.

59

12

495

130, 298

Wyoming v. Colorado, 42 Sup. Ct. 552, 259 U. S. 419, 463, 66 L. Ed.
999___

Wyoming (State Board of Equalization of) v. North Side Canal Co.,
8 Fed. (2d) 739; 17 Fed. (2d) 55; certiorari denied, 274 U. S.
740_

Wyoming v. United States, 255, U. S. 489, Supr. Ct. Decision, 6/1/36_
Yuma County Water Users' Association v. Schlecht, 275 Fed. 885;
affirmed, 43 Sup. Ct. 498, 262 U. S. 138, 67 L. Ed. 909-

Credits on construction charges, Yuma and Yuma Mesa_.
Credits on operation and maintenance charges, Yuma and Yuma Mesa---
Credits on charges paid on land to be conveyed to United States, Klamath
project.

355

405

524

Crehore, Lawrence W. (51 L. D. 345), refunds to veterans_.

304

Crop return, gross annual, Secretary without authority to change the per-
centum of (Dept. dec.).

Culpepper v. Ocheltree, 185 Pac. 971, certiorari granted, 253 U. S. 480–
Cunha, Joseph, title to property.

D

Dam across Rio Grande.

Damage claims against Government---

Damages collected not to be credited to reclamation fund_.

Damages, compromise of----

Page
72,96
272

14

62, 186

Damages or delays in construction work, Government's liability for--

Damages, payment of, to Hatch flood claimants__.

Date of payment of construction charges, fact finders' act_

295

Dates, payment of charges (extension act and act May 15, 1922) ---- 150, 152, 266
Davis, Howe & Co., payment of amount deducted as liquidated damages,
Salt Lake Basin project_

470

Deadwood Reservoir, application of power revenues from Black Canyon
dam----

415

Deceased employees, personal effects of (Comp. Gen. dec.).

Deferment of construction charges under section 9 of moratorium act of
April 1, 1932 (Dept. dec.) ___.

484-485

Deferred construction charges, Department construction of section 4 of
moratorium act of April 1, 1932.

482-483

Deficiency acts. See appropriation act (deficiency).

Delay in delivery, administrative officers have no authority to waive_____
Delay in delivery of goods, computation of time--.

42

42

Delays of damages, Government's liability for.

34

Delinquency in payment of charges for more than 12 months--.

De Long, Frederick C. (36 L. D. 332), descent of rights_

30

Demonstrations on reclamation projects----

469

Denver office, headquarters of chief engineer_.

308, 462

Delivery time to be increased proportional to increase in order..
Denver office appropriation----

37

164

Departmental decisions:

Attendance at meetings to be specifically authorized by Secretary__
Authority, delegation of, to approve land sales....

569

314

Award of bids to high bidder__.

27

Boulder Canyon, all-American canal, San Diego contract.

387

Boulder Canyon, mining claims__.

25

Collections of construction charges, calendar year 1931, under mora-

Crop return, gross annual, Secretary without authority to change
per centum of....

Delay in delivery of goods, administrative officers may not waive___
Delivery time to be increased proportional to increase in order__.
Delegation of authority to approve land sales----
Exchange of patented lands‒‒‒‒

42

37

314

300

Departmental decisions--Continued.

Federal Subsistence Homestead Corporation, right of under Reclama-
tion projects---.

Page

Freight rates, authority to contract for lower_.

Glasgow irrigation district, increase of indebtedness__.

Irrigation districts, reasonable time permitted to dispose of lands__.

139

Kimmel, Glen L., and Goshen irrigation district (excess acreage).

139

Land, Secretary's right to convey_.

Liquidated damages do not cover equipment_.

Lease of areas to prevent spread of noxious weeds.

427

Payette Boise Water Users' Association, stock subscriptions in 43-44
Relief covers penalty for nonpayment charges, moratorium acts_-_-
Rights of way, purchase of

484

5

Rio Grande project, damage claims, Alamo Levee_.
Secretary held an indispensable party defendant.

189

51-52

Seepage damages__.

188

State of Washington contract on settlement of Kittitas division, ex-
penditures under___.

Desert-land entries, size of farm units on (act of June 6, 1930)

429

Desert-land entrymen, rights of..

30

Designation of officials and name of bureau, change of__

140

Disability or death benefits of employees under E. R. A. A. of 1935
(Comp. Gen. dec.)----

572

Disposal of land classified as temporarily or permanently unproductive__
Ditch right of way--

Domestic materials clause, Treasury and Post Office appropriation act..

Drainage works, part of project (Yuma County Water Users' Association
v. Schlecht).

220
150, 152

19