Taking the Constitution Away from the CourtsPrinceton University Press, 2000 M07 24 - 256 páginas Here a leading scholar in constitutional law, Mark Tushnet, challenges hallowed American traditions of judicial review and judicial supremacy, which allow U.S. judges to invalidate "unconstitutional" governmental actions. Many people, particularly liberals, have "warm and fuzzy" feelings about judicial review. They are nervous about what might happen to unprotected constitutional provisions in the chaotic worlds of practical politics and everyday life. By examining a wide range of situations involving constitutional rights, Tushnet vigorously encourages us all to take responsibility for protecting our liberties. Guarding them is not the preserve of judges, he maintains, but a commitment of the citizenry to define itself as "We the People of the United States." The Constitution belongs to us collectively, as we act in political dialogue with each other--whether in the street, in the voting booth, or in the legislature as representatives of others. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 59
... actually did not find many constitutional violations. For example, it let the armed forces apply a general rule against wearing non-official headgear to an Orthodox Jew who wanted to wear his yarmulke.2 But the constitutional standard ...
... laws incidentally burdened religious exercise, but, the Court said, there was precious little evidence that there was a serious problem of laws actually directed at religious exercise. So Congress was not remedying existing PROLOGUE 4.
... actually has to enforce Proposition 187. School administrators, for example, may have to ask about the citizenship status of the parents of children who attempt to enroll in their schools. They are supposed to refuse to admit children ...
... actually concur with the principles of that decision.”7 In his First Inaugural Address, delivered even as the South prepared for war over slavery, Lincoln again made his position clear. Dred Scott was “binding . . . upon the parties ...
... actually developed. It invented the legislative veto to offset the power it had delegated to executive officials. The legislative veto comes in several variants, but its basic idea is this: Congress gives broad authority to an executive ...