Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

ference would be proper that in so doing it had violated the law of the road quoted above. A witness who was walking south on Ogden at the time of the accident and had passed Mr. Stern at Broadway, and who subsequently assisted in removing Mr. Stern from under the truck, testified that there was an auto truck resembling the one causing the injury at a point on Broadway west of Ogden, and that at such time he saw no other approaching automobile. We think there was sufficient evidence to require the submission of the issues involved to the jury.

[3] Complaint is made by defendant of the reception in evidenc on plaintiff's offer of the findings made by the Industrial Commission in the proceedings upon the claim for compensation by Mr. Stern against his employer and the plaintiff as its insurer. Being in the nature of a judgment or final determination of a dispute between other parties, it could not be considered conclusive upon the question of defendas liability herein. It could be properly considered, however, as at least mak ing prima facie proof of the facts necessarily alleged in the complaint herein, viz., of claim having been made by Mr. Stern against the employer and that the claim had been allowed and paid, and such allegations being put in issue by defendant's answer. Grand Rapids L. Co. v. Blair, 190 Mich. 518, 526, 157 N. W. 29; O.. S. N. Co. v. C. T. E., 134 N. Y. 461, 469, 31 N. E. 987, 30 Am. St. Rep. 685. Jones on Ev. (2d Ed.) § 590; 23 Cyc. 1271; 15 R. C. L. 1021.

The judgment of nonsuit therefore having been improperly granted, plaintiff's motion for a new trial should have been allowed.

Judgment reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, and a new trial granted.

TABLE OF CASES REPORTED

A cumulative list of cases in the current issue and all previous issues
of the same volume.

Alvarado v. Flower Bros. Rock Crusher Co. (Kan. S. C.).

Anderson v. Bauer et al. (Wash. S. C.) ...

761

Anderson v. Industrial Insurance Commission of Washington (Wash.
S. C.)

762

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

... 726

[blocks in formation]

536

613

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Gauthier v. Penobscot Chemical Fiber Co, et al. (Me. S. J. C.)...... 65
Geis v. Packard Motor Car Co. (Mich. S. C.).

554

Hinchuk v. Swift & Co. (Minn. S. C.)

102

Hines v. Henry I. Stetler, Inc., et al. (N. Y. S. C.).

. 258

Hines, Director General of Railroads, v. Meier. (U. S. C. C. A.) 465

Home Life & Accident Co. v. Jordan (Tex. C. C. A.).
Huddleston et al. v. Texas Pipe Line Co. (Tex. C. C. A.).
Hutno v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. (Pa. S. C.)....
Ideal Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission et al. (Ill. S. C.)..

428

306

134

356

Illinois Publishing & Printing Co. v. Industrial Commission et al.
(Ill. S. C.)

780

Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. Kutter et al. (Ind. A. C.)
Industrial Commission et al. v. Crisman. (Ariz. S. C.)
Integrity Mut. Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., v. Nelson.

370

474

(Minn.

S. C.)

570

Inter-Urban Const. Co. et al. v. Industrial Commission et al. (Utah
S. C.

650

Jackson v. Wilde, Mayor of City of San Diego, et al.
A.)

(Cal. D. C.

339

Janschewsky v. E. W. Bliss Co. et al. (N. Y. S. C.)
Jones v. Industrial Acc. Commission of California et al.
C. A.)

Jordan v. Decorative Co. (N. Y. C. A.)

617

(Cal. D.

676

[blocks in formation]

Lawrence Ice Cream Co. v. Industrial Commission et al. (Ill. S. C.) 360

Leone's Case (Mass. S. J. C.)

252

Leva v. Utah Fuel Co. et al. (Utah S. C.)

640

London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., et al. v. Industrial Commission
et al. (Colo. S. C.)

678

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co. et al. (N. Y. S. C.)

266

Metropolitan Milk Co. et al. v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. (Minn.
S. C.)

567

Miami Coal Co. v. Luce. (Ind. A. C.)

498

Midwest Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Davis, Director General of Rail-
reads. (Mo. S. C.)

715

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Peabody Coal Co. v. Industria. Co mission et al.

Pearce v. Industrial Commission

People v. Donnelly. (N. Y. S
People ex rel. Oelsner v. Anarus

874

[blocks in formation]

People ex rel. Terbush & Powell, Inc., v. Dibble, City Comptroller.

(N. Y. S. C.)

414

324

S. C.)

Pushor et ux. v. American Ry. Exp. Co. (Minn. S. C.)
Quilty v. Connecticut Co. (Conn. S. C. E.).

Poe v. Continental Oil & Cotton Co. et al. (Tex. Com. of App.)

Porter v. Mapleton Electric Light Co. et al. (Iowa S. C.)

Potier v. Winifred Coal Co. (Iowa S. C.)

Pryor et al. v. Industrial Acc. Commission et al. (Cal. S. C.)
Pullman Car Lines, United States Administration, v. Riley. (Del.

Radtke Bros. et al. v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin et al.

486

684

573

13

(Wis. S. C.)

460

615

[blocks in formation]

Rockefeller. Industrial Commission of Utah (Utah S. C.).

« AnteriorContinuar »