Non-interference by Congress with Slavery in the Territories: Speech of Hon. S.A. Douglas, of Illinois, in the Senate, May 15 and 16, 1860Murphy, 1860 - 40 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 19
Página 2
... believe him both ; the history of the times has enabled every one to know that I re- ferred to Mr. Cass . I wish to say that an omis- sion at the close of a sentence , after the word " sent , " may leave the inference that the letter ...
... believe him both ; the history of the times has enabled every one to know that I re- ferred to Mr. Cass . I wish to say that an omis- sion at the close of a sentence , after the word " sent , " may leave the inference that the letter ...
Página 4
... believe just as conscientiously that it is both within the power and the duty of Congress to legislate for the protection of slavery in the Territories , as they then believed it was uncon- stitutional for Congress to do so . All I have ...
... believe just as conscientiously that it is both within the power and the duty of Congress to legislate for the protection of slavery in the Territories , as they then believed it was uncon- stitutional for Congress to do so . All I have ...
Página 6
... believe , is well known in Alabama - an eminent citizen . He pledged Alabama for General Cass on this doctrine of non - intervention , carrying the Nich- olson letter in his hand as the compass by which his political action was to be ...
... believe , is well known in Alabama - an eminent citizen . He pledged Alabama for General Cass on this doctrine of non - intervention , carrying the Nich- olson letter in his hand as the compass by which his political action was to be ...
Página 7
... believe in this doctrine of non - intervention , and the That is , nobody but the owner of the slave Senator from Mississippi was one of them . Ho must interfere with his right to hold him.supported General Cass under protest , making ...
... believe in this doctrine of non - intervention , and the That is , nobody but the owner of the slave Senator from Mississippi was one of them . Ho must interfere with his right to hold him.supported General Cass under protest , making ...
Página 11
... believe that if he had been sustained in his appeal to the people of Mississippi against the compromise measures of 1850 , the Union could not have been preserved . He appealed to Mis- sissippi . General Foote was the standard - bearer ...
... believe that if he had been sustained in his appeal to the people of Mississippi against the compromise measures of 1850 , the Union could not have been preserved . He appealed to Mis- sissippi . General Foote was the standard - bearer ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Non-Interference by Congress with Slavery in the Territories: Speech of Hon ... Stephen Arnold Douglas Sin vista previa disponible - 2017 |
Non-Interference by Congress with Slavery in the Territories. Speech of ... Stephen Arnold Douglas Sin vista previa disponible - 2015 |
Non-Interference by Congress with Slavery in the Territories. Speech of ... Stephen Arnold Douglas Sin vista previa disponible - 2018 |
Términos y frases comunes
Abolitionists affirmed agreed Alabama amendment ask my friend authority Baltimore believe Buchanan candidate carry Cass caucus Charleston convention Cincinnati platform ciple Clay committee compromise measures Congress with slavery Constitution courts cratic party DAVIS debate decide decision declared delegates Demo Democratic organization Democratic party doctrine of non-intervention DOUGLAS elected endorsed exclude slavery friend from Ohio Georgia Georgia platform Governor gress honor Illinois institutions Kansas Kansas-Nebraska bill Kentucky leave legislation majority Maryland measures of 1850 Missouri compromise never nomination non-intervention by Congress North Carolina northern Ohio to read opinion plat pledged political popular sovereignty President prohibit proposition PUGH read quote repeal resolutions Reverdy Johnson seceders Senator from Mississippi slave South Southern League southern rights speech squatter government squatter sovereignty stand Tennessee Terri Territorial Legislature Territory of Kansas tion tories tutional unanimous Union United vention violation Virginia vote Wilmot proviso Yancey Yancey's
Pasajes populares
Página 13 - Measures, is hereby declared inoperative and void : it being the true intent and meaning of this act, not to legislate slavery into any territory or state, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the constitution of the United States...
Página 18 - Nebraska bill declared, in so many words, that it was the true intent and meaning of the act not to legislate slavery into any State or Territory, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States.
Página 13 - March 6, 1820, which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-intervention by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories, as recognized by the legislation of 1850, commonly called the compromise measures, is hereby declared inoperative and void— it being the true Intent and meaning of this act, not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude It therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and...
Página 8 - That the legislative power of the territory shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act ; but no law shall be passed interfering with the primary disposal of the soil ; no tax shall be imposed upon the property of the United States...
Página 9 - The position that I have ever taken has been, that this, and all other questions relating to the domestic affairs and domestic policy of the territories, ought to be left to the decision of the people themselves ; and that we ought to be content with whatever way they may decide the question...
Página 13 - States, except the eighth section of the act preparatory to the admission of Missouri into the Union, (approved March 6, 1820,) which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-intervention by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories — as recognized by the legislation of 1850, commonly called the Compromise Measures — is hereby declared inoperative and void...
Página 21 - Territories; and whose avowed purposes, if consummated, must end in civil war and disunion, the American Democracy recognize and adopt the principles contained in the organic laws establishing the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska as embodying the only sound and safe solution of the "slavery question...
Página 13 - March 6, 1820,) which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-intervention by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories — as recognized by the legislation of 1850, commonly called the Compromise Measures — is hereby declared inoperative and void; it being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof...
Página 12 - ... of Mexican territory. They were designed to establish certain great principles, which would not only furnish adequate remedies for existing evils, but, in all time to come, avoid the perils of a similar agitation, by withdrawing the question of slavery from the halls of Congress and the political arena, and committing it to the arbitrament of those who were immediately interested in, and alone responsible for its consequences.
Página 1 - It seems to have been more malleable than gold, to have been hammered out to an extent that covers boundless regions undiscovered by those who proclaimed the doctrine. Non-intervention then meant, as the debates show, that Congress should neither prohibit nor establish slavery in the Territories. That I hold to now. Will any one suppose that Congress then meant by non-intervention that Congress should legislate in no regard in respect to property in slaves? Why, sir, the very acts which they passed...