A Treatise on the Law of Evidence, Volumen1Little, Brown,, 1866 - 675 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 31
... supra , § 23 , note . 1 Marston v . Hobbs , 2 Mass . 483 ; Bearce v . Jackson , 4 Mass . 408 ; Twom- bly v . Henly , Id . 441 ; Chapell v . Bull , 17 4 . Mass . 213. [ These cases have not been followed in some of the other states ...
... supra , § 23 , note . 1 Marston v . Hobbs , 2 Mass . 483 ; Bearce v . Jackson , 4 Mass . 408 ; Twom- bly v . Henly , Id . 441 ; Chapell v . Bull , 17 4 . Mass . 213. [ These cases have not been followed in some of the other states ...
Página 47
... supra , § 35. But there is no absolute presumption of law as to the continuance of life ; nor any absolute presumption against a person's doing an act because the doing of it would be an offence against the law . In every case the ...
... supra , § 35. But there is no absolute presumption of law as to the continuance of life ; nor any absolute presumption against a person's doing an act because the doing of it would be an offence against the law . In every case the ...
Página 60
... supra , may be consulted as a very fair and able exposition of the ar- gument and authority in favor of the oppo- site view from that maintained in the pre- ceding portion of this note . For ourselves , we have always been content not ...
... supra , may be consulted as a very fair and able exposition of the ar- gument and authority in favor of the oppo- site view from that maintained in the pre- ceding portion of this note . For ourselves , we have always been content not ...
Página 61
... question of the admissibility of the rec- ords of such meeting , is for the judge , and not for the jury . Gorton v . Hadsell , ub supra . ] we state as the FIRST RULE , governing in the VOL T CHAP . I. ] 61 THE RELEVANCY OF EVIDENCE .
... question of the admissibility of the rec- ords of such meeting , is for the judge , and not for the jury . Gorton v . Hadsell , ub supra . ] we state as the FIRST RULE , governing in the VOL T CHAP . I. ] 61 THE RELEVANCY OF EVIDENCE .
Página 63
... supra ; Van Buren v . Wells , 19 Wend . 203 ; Crenshaw v . Davenport , 6 Ala . 390 ; Tuzzle v . Barclay , Id . 407 ; Abney v . Kingsland , 10 Ala . 355 ; Yeatman v . Hart , 6 Humph . 375. [ * In Harris v . Holmes , 30 Vt . Rep . 352 ...
... supra ; Van Buren v . Wells , 19 Wend . 203 ; Crenshaw v . Davenport , 6 Ala . 390 ; Tuzzle v . Barclay , Id . 407 ; Abney v . Kingsland , 10 Ala . 355 ; Yeatman v . Hart , 6 Humph . 375. [ * In Harris v . Holmes , 30 Vt . Rep . 352 ...
Términos y frases comunes
action admissible admitted alleged allowed answer appear applied authority Bank bill Bing called Campb cause character charge circumstances cited claim common competent witness conclusive confession considered contract copy course court criminal Cush decision deed defendant dence deposition East effect evidence examination exception execution existence extended fact former give given Gray ground held intention interest issue Johns judge judgment jury justice land Lord Mass material matter meaning nature necessary notice oath objection observed offered officer opinion original parol evidence particular party person Phil Pick plaintiff practice presumed presumption principle produce proof proved question reason received record regard relation render rule seems Smith Stark Stat statute sufficient suit supra taken testify testimony thing tion trial truth United unless Wend wife writing written
Pasajes populares
Página 548 - The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any State or Territory, or of any such country, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, that the said attestation is in due form.
Página 181 - Eyre to be this, — that they are declarations made in extremity, when the party is at the point of death, and when every hope of this world is gone ; when every motive to falsehood is silenced, and the mind is induced, by the most powerful considerations, to speak the truth.
Página 324 - ... insensible with reference to extrinsic circumstances, a court of law may look into the extrinsic circumstances of the case to see whether the meaning of the words be sensible in any popular or secondary sense, of which with reference to these circumstances, they are capable.
Página 39 - Malice, in common acceptation, means ill-will against a person; but, in its legal sense, it means a wrongful act, done intentionally, without just cause or excuse.
Página 296 - One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
Página 493 - By means of it, the situation of the witness with respect to the parties and to the subject of litigation, his interest, his motives, his inclination and prejudices, his means of obtaining a correct and certain knowledge of the facts to which he bears testimony...
Página 281 - A clergyman or priest cannot, without the consent of the person making the confession, be examined as to any confession made to him in his professional character in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which he belongs.
Página 58 - It is the duty of the court to instruct the jury as to the law ; and it is the duty of the jury to follow the law, as it is laid down by the Court.
Página 312 - When parties have deliberately put their engagements into writing, in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking was reduced to writing...
Página 329 - Now, there is but one case in which it appears to us that this sort of evidence of intention can properly be admitted, and that is, where the meaning of the testator's words is neither ambiguous nor obscure, and where the devise is, on the face of it, perfect and intelligible, but, from some of the circumstances admitted in proof, an ambiguity arises, as to which of the two or more things, or which of the two or more persons (each answering the words in the will), the testator intended to express.