The Debate on the American Civil War EraA historiographical examination of treatments of the Civil War from those that were engaged in it to those of the 1990s. The author argues for the centrality of racial assumptions both in the actual conflict and in conflicting interpretations. He traces how the historians' attitudes and assumptions were partly dictated by time and place and points to an overarching theme of the suppression of the centrality of race in the period following the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and before the emergence of the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s. Distributed by St. Martin's Press. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 47
Página 154
1 But then to concede the inevitability of defeat from the start was to question the
collective sanity of the Confederacy . No , the South ' s was a high - risk strategy ,
but sometimes risks pay off . In 1861 both the Confederacy and Europe ( and ...
1 But then to concede the inevitability of defeat from the start was to question the
collective sanity of the Confederacy . No , the South ' s was a high - risk strategy ,
but sometimes risks pay off . In 1861 both the Confederacy and Europe ( and ...
Página 164
Yet , by the same token , he did formulate the overall Northern strategy , the
anaconda strategy , that would eventually bring the South to its knees . This plan
involved a three - pronged assault upon the South : one to capture the
Mississippi ...
Yet , by the same token , he did formulate the overall Northern strategy , the
anaconda strategy , that would eventually bring the South to its knees . This plan
involved a three - pronged assault upon the South : one to capture the
Mississippi ...
Página 171
15 But these were minor tiffs , for , in essence , both were fighting on the same
side : their aim was to come up with fresh strategic thinking by applying surprise ,
rear offensive , outflanking movements , alternative objectives and ' baited
gambits ...
15 But these were minor tiffs , for , in essence , both were fighting on the same
side : their aim was to come up with fresh strategic thinking by applying surprise ,
rear offensive , outflanking movements , alternative objectives and ' baited
gambits ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abolitionists American History argued army attempt battle became believed Bois called cause cent Charles Civil Civil War concerned Confederacy Confederate Constitution continued contributed cotton culture David Davis decisively defeat Democratic depicted early economic emancipation emerged entirely equality example federal fight followed force freedom Garrison Genovese Grant held highly historians human industrial insisted institution interpretation issue James Jefferson John labour Lincoln London major Mass master McPherson means military moral Negro never North Northern Owsley Oxford past period Phillips plantation political politicians President problem profits question quoted race racial radical Randall Reconstruction remained Republican party revisionist Richard Robert Senator served slave slavery social society soldiers South Southern Stampp strategy struggle suggested Thomas tion turn Union United University vote West writings wrote York
Referencias a este libro
Información bibliográfica
| Título | The Debate on the American Civil War Era Issues in historiography |
| Autor | Hugh Tulloch |
| Colaborador | Frank and Virginia Williams Collection of Lincolniana (Mississippi State University. Libraries)|5 MsSM |
| Editor | Manchester University Press, 1999 |
| Procedencia del original | Universidad de Michigan |
| Digitalizado | 18 Sep. 2008 |
| ISBN | 0719049377, 9780719049378 |
| Largo | 255 páginas |
| Exportar cita | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |