The Debate on the American Civil War EraA historiographical examination of treatments of the Civil War from those that were engaged in it to those of the 1990s. The author argues for the centrality of racial assumptions both in the actual conflict and in conflicting interpretations. He traces how the historians' attitudes and assumptions were partly dictated by time and place and points to an overarching theme of the suppression of the centrality of race in the period following the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and before the emergence of the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s. Distributed by St. Martin's Press. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 25
Página 18
I have done this partly in my Jefferson book . . . and in a forthcoming book called
The Genius of American Politics . 14 In that book he argued persuasively for a
consensual tradition , marked by the absence of sharp ideological conflict or ...
I have done this partly in my Jefferson book . . . and in a forthcoming book called
The Genius of American Politics . 14 In that book he argued persuasively for a
consensual tradition , marked by the absence of sharp ideological conflict or ...
Página 25
Other , calmer , voices called the profession back from the abyss of terminal
confusion . Vann Woodward in his Association of American Historians
presidential address of 1969 , ' Clio with soul ' , called for calm and mutual
toleration , and ...
Other , calmer , voices called the profession back from the abyss of terminal
confusion . Vann Woodward in his Association of American Historians
presidential address of 1969 , ' Clio with soul ' , called for calm and mutual
toleration , and ...
Página 123
Beside such mighty material forces the moral issue of slavery could not be
important , and the so - called Civil War and the acts of individual politicians were
, as the French Annales school would put it , mere superficial évènements . Yet
the ...
Beside such mighty material forces the moral issue of slavery could not be
important , and the so - called Civil War and the acts of individual politicians were
, as the French Annales school would put it , mere superficial évènements . Yet
the ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abolitionists American History argued army attempt battle became believed Bois called cause cent Charles Civil Civil War concerned Confederacy Confederate Constitution continued contributed cotton culture David Davis decisively defeat Democratic depicted early economic emancipation emerged entirely equality example federal fight followed force freedom Garrison Genovese Grant held highly historians human industrial insisted institution interpretation issue James Jefferson John labour Lincoln London major Mass master McPherson means military moral Negro never North Northern Owsley Oxford past period Phillips plantation political politicians President problem profits question quoted race racial radical Randall Reconstruction remained Republican party revisionist Richard Robert Senator served slave slavery social society soldiers South Southern Stampp strategy struggle suggested Thomas tion turn Union United University vote West writings wrote York
Referencias a este libro
Información bibliográfica
| Título | The Debate on the American Civil War Era Issues in historiography |
| Autor | Hugh Tulloch |
| Colaborador | Frank and Virginia Williams Collection of Lincolniana (Mississippi State University. Libraries)|5 MsSM |
| Editor | Manchester University Press, 1999 |
| Procedencia del original | Universidad de Michigan |
| Digitalizado | 18 Sep. 2008 |
| ISBN | 0719049377, 9780719049378 |
| Largo | 255 páginas |
| Exportar cita | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |