« AnteriorContinuar »
A fragment,of the same date as the preceding.
IF A can prove, however conclusively, that he may of right enslave B, why may not B snatch the same argument and prove equally that he may enslave A? You say A is white and B is black. It is color, then; the lighter having the right to enslave the darker? Take care. By this rule you are to be slave to the first man you meet with a fairer skin than your own.
You do not mean color exactly? You mean the whites are intellectually the superiors of the blacks, and therefore
have the right to enslave them? Take care again. By this rule you are to be slave to the first man you meet with an intellect superior to your own.
But, say you, it is a question of interest, and if you make it your interest you have the right to enslave another. Very well. And if he can make it his interest he has the right to en
THE REAL SOUTHERN VIEW
From a speech delivered at Peoria, Illinois, October 16, 1854, in reply to Senator Douglas.
EQUAL justice to the South, it is said, requires us to consent to the extension of slavery to new countries.
That is to say, inasmuch as you do not object to my taking my hog to Nebraska, therefore must not object to you taking your slave.
Now, I admit that this is perfectly logical, if there is no difference between hogs and negroes. But while
thus require me to deny the humanity of the negro, I wish to ask whe
ther you of the South yourselves have ever been willing to do as much. It is kindly provided that of all those who come into the world only a small percentage are natural tyrants. That percentage is no larger in the slave States than in the free. The great majority South, as well as North, have human sympathies, of which they can no more divest themselves than they can of their sensibility to physical pain. These sympathies in the bosoms of the Southern people manifest, in many ways, their sense of the wrong of slavery, and their consciousness that, after all, there is humanity in the negro.
If they deny this, let me address them a few plain questions. In 1820 you joined the North, almost unanimously, in declaring the African slavetrade piracy, and in annexing
to it the punishment of death. Why did you do this? If you did not feel that it was wrong, why did you join in providing that men should be hung for it? The practice was no more than bringing wild negroes from Africa to such as would buy them. But you never thought of hanging men for catching and selling wild horses, wild buffaloes, or wild bears.
Again, you have among you a sneaking individual of the class of native tyrants known
“ Slave-Dealer.” He watches your necessities, and crawls up to buy your slave at a speculating price. If you cannot help it, you sell to him; but if you can help it, you drive him from your door. You despise him utterly. You do not recognize him as friend, or even as an honest
Your children must not