Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

4.

$25,000 or more on September 30, 1977, when it held more than 10 percent of

that bank's or holding company's stock in a collateral capacity.

Name and location of the institution whose stock was pledged; data on

"due-to" and "due-from" demand deposit balances; whether the borrower is

an executive officer, director, or major stockholder; date of the note; interest

rate; percentage of outstanding shares pledged; and other pertinent data were

among the 15 specific data items or questions pertaining to each reportable

stock loan. Many of these specific data items were not readily retrievable,

even by banks with automated systems and, therefore, manual examination of

credit files and collateral records was necessary.

B. Table LA

According to results presented in Table 1A, 902 banks, 6.4 percent of

the 14,137 banks, reported bank or bank holding company stock loans on

September 30, 1977 as called for in Schedule I of the survey.

A total of

10,214 stock loans was reported with balances totaling $2.7 billion. These

loans amounted to 1.0 percent of the total dollar amount of all outstanding

loans at those banks reporting stock loans and 0.5 percent of total loans

at all insured commercial banks. Banks with assets in excess of $300 million

accounted for 67.8 percent of the number and 77.8 percent of the dollar

volume of stock loans. Of the 399 reporting banks larger than $300 million

in assets, 219 or 54.9 percent reported stock loans.

The percentage of banks reporting stock loans increases with bank size.

The percentage rises from 2.6 percent of those with less than $50 million in

total assets to 80.0 percent of those with more than $5 billion in total assets.

[ocr errors]

The number of stock loans averaged ll per lending bank, rising from

2 in the smallest banks (under $50 million in assets) to 30 in the largest (over

$5 billion in assets). The average balance per stock loan rises from $106, 000

in the smallest banks to $840,000 in the largest banks. For all banks making

such loans, the average stock loan balance was $267,000.

Total stock loan balances averaged $3.0 million per lending bank.

Although the amount of such loans increased with bank size, the proportion of

stock loans in the banks' loan portfolios rose from 1.2 percent of total

loans for the smallest banks to 2.5 percent for banks in the $300 to $999

million class and then declined to 0.3 percent of the total loans for the

largest lending banks.

About 81. 2 percent of stock loans was for the purpose of purchasing

commercial bank or holding company stock. For those loans used to purchase

such stock, 49.4 percent was known to have been associated with a change

in control of the bank or holding company. Of all stock-secured loans,

40.1 percent was connected with a change in control. The survey did not

address the portion of the purchase price financed by stock loans.

C. Tables IF and 1G

In Table 1F, information about bank and bank holding company stock loans

is summarized by interest rate charged by lending banks that did not hold demand

deposits (due-to balances) of the banks whose stock secures

ne loans. The

same kinds of information are presented in Table IG for lending banks that

held demand deposits of the banks whose stock secures the loans. About 88.1

percent of the number and 88.6 percent of the total amount of stock loans

extended involved a due-to relationship.

- 6

Stock loans carry either a fixed rate or floating rate.

A fixed rate

is set on the date the note is executed and remains unchanged until the note is

paid off or refinanced or until it matures.

A floating rate

enerally is tied

to a market interest rate, such as the prime rate, and is adjusted periodically.

Floating-rate loans accounted for 56.8 percent of the 10, 214 stock

loans reported in Tables 1F and 1G and 65.4 percent of the total dollar volume.

For 90.1 percent of the floating-rate loans and 85.5 percent of the fixed-rate

loans, the banks whose stock was pledged maintained demand deposit relation

ships with the lending banks. However, the data do not indicate whether those

banks whose stock was pledged had correspondent relationships with the lending

institutions prior to origination of the loans or established such relationships

at the time such loans were extended.

Floating-rate stock loans were, on average, considerably larger than

fixed-rate loans. This is true regardless of whether the bank whose stock

was pledged mainta

a demand deposit account with the lending institution.

Average stock loan size does not appear to depend on the existence of a

demand deposit relationship.

Comparison of results presented in Tables 1F and 1G indicates that fixed

rate loans where the bank whose stock was pledged did not maintain correspondent

deposits generally had higher interest rates than fixed-rate loans where the bank

did maintain such deposits.

As indicated by Table IF, fixed-rate stock loan lending activity by

banks without balances due-to was concentrated in the 7 to 9 percent range,

with 53.4 percent at rates above 8 percent. Such concentrations, as reflected

. 7

in Table 1G, were in the 6 to 8 percent range for fixed-rate loans extended

by banks with balances due-to, with 21. 0 percent at rates above 8 percent.

Such results are suggestive of preferential interest rates where demand

balances are maintained. However, firm inferences about preferential rates

cannot be drawn at this time because Tables IF and IG do not contain loan

origination date (date of the note), term of the loan, credit standing of the

borrower and the borrower's institution, size of the due-to balances rela

tive to correspondent services provided, detail on charges for such services,

and method of compensation for these services. Examination of such informa

tion is essential before the existence of preferential interest rates on stock

loans involving a correspondent relationship can be established definitively.

In general, the data in Table IG did not indicate that the average

amount of correspondent balances per stock loan relative to the average stock

loan balance is related to rates charged on stock loans. There was no con

sistent relation between the net demand deposit balances due to the lending

banks by the banks whose stock was pledged and average stock loan size for the

3,733 fixed-rate loans carrying rates above 5 percent. Only for the 36 loans

in the 3.00 to 4.99 percent interest-rate interval is there a suggestion of a link

between preferential stock loan interest rates and correspondent balances.

The data in Table 1G disaggregated according to size category of the

lending bank suggest a similar relationship for lending banks with less than

$300 million in total assets. Average net demand deposit balances maintained

by banks whose stock secure loans extended by the lending banks tend to

increase relative to the average stock loan balances as loan interest rates

decline.

This does not appear to be the case generally for larger banks.

- 8

However, it is not possible to determine from these data whether

correspondent balances were used as compensating balances to obtain prefer

ential rates on stock loans because the survey did not collect information on

the provision of banking services, which may be related to the correspondent

balances maintained.

D. Table 2

Stock loans to executive officers, major stockholders and directors of

other banks (but not bank holding companies) are summarized in Table 2 by

interest rate range and time period when the loan was originated (date of note).

The average monthly prime rate, as reported in the Federal Reserve Bulletin,

is recorded for each time period except "1969 and prior." The "prime rate"

used is the rate that the largest money center commercial banks charge their

best customers on short-term business loans. Short-term customarily refers

to loans that have a term of less than one year. * Thus, the prime rate is a

good comparison rate only for some short-term, fixed-rate stock loans origi

nated during 1977 and most floating-rate stock loans. A longer-term rate is

more appropriate for most rate comparisons for stock loans originated prior

to 1977. During the period covered by the survey, short-term business loan

rates averaged 50 to 75 basis points above prime, and long-term business

loan rates averaged 90 to 120 basis points above prime. While most business

loans are unsecured, stock loans obviously are secured and, as such, should

carry somewhat lower rates.

Loan rates also depend on the location of the

*The prime rate for the second half of 1975 is incorrectly stated as 7.80 percent on Table 2. It should be 7.57 percent.

« AnteriorContinuar »