The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1997--S. 621: Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session, on S. 621 ... April 29, 1997, Volumen4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 - 310 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 47
Página
... Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato 87 Susan Tomasky , General Counsel , Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Prepared statement 57 Response to written questions of Senator D ...
... Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato 87 Susan Tomasky , General Counsel , Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Prepared statement 57 Response to written questions of Senator D ...
Página
... Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato 33 78 78 78 80 81 272 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUPPLIED FOR THE RECORD Letter from Senator Dale Bumpers to Chairman Alfonse M. D'Amato , dated April 29 , 1997 277 Statement of the Chemical ...
... Response to written questions of Senator D'Amato 33 78 78 78 80 81 272 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUPPLIED FOR THE RECORD Letter from Senator Dale Bumpers to Chairman Alfonse M. D'Amato , dated April 29 , 1997 277 Statement of the Chemical ...
Página 4
... response to that , again , is that PUHCA is a restriction on the 13 registered electric holding companies , but not on the several hundred PUHCA - exempt electric utilities . State public utility com- missions today face this problem ...
... response to that , again , is that PUHCA is a restriction on the 13 registered electric holding companies , but not on the several hundred PUHCA - exempt electric utilities . State public utility com- missions today face this problem ...
Página 11
... response to our concerns during last year's debate by changing the effective date from 12 to 18 months , in our view , a transition period of 2 years , at a minimum , would be more appropriate to enable State commis- sions to acquire ...
... response to our concerns during last year's debate by changing the effective date from 12 to 18 months , in our view , a transition period of 2 years , at a minimum , would be more appropriate to enable State commis- sions to acquire ...
Página 39
... response to the question you gave Mr. Meyer , on one of the comments from Dr. Cooper , let me talk just briefly about one of our current experiences in utility - related activities and merger , and that is the one with Enova . We are ...
... response to the question you gave Mr. Meyer , on one of the comments from Dr. Cooper , let me talk just briefly about one of our current experiences in utility - related activities and merger , and that is the one with Enova . We are ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abuses acquisition affiliate transactions agencies approval argue assets authority books and records capacity Chairman changes CINergy Colorado Municipals commenters Commission's Committee concerns Congress consolidation consumer protection corporate costs customer choice disposition diversification Docket electric industry electric power industry electric utility Enova Energy ensure entities factors Federal Power Act FERC filed geographic markets Guidelines hearing Holding Company Act holding company systems Houston Industries issues jurisdictional facilities Kern River legislation market concentration market power merger applications Merger Policy merging mitigate monopoly Morgan Stanley NARUC natural gas non-utility NorAm Energy open access operating Petitioners Policy Statement potential power marketer proposed merger public interest Public Utility Holding PUHCA repeal rate-payers rates registered holding companies regulation repeal of PUHCA require restructuring retail SEC's section 203 Senator Southern Company structure suppliers Texas transmission constraints utility companies utility holding companies wholesale