Door Posts-Business Men's League of St. Louis v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 330 (1903).

Dressed Meat-In the Matter of Proposed Advances in Freight Rates, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 382 (1903); Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 428 (1905).

Earthenware-Chamber of Commerce of Chattanooga v. Southern Ry., 10 J. C. C. Rep. 117 (1904).

Egg Cases-Rhode Island Egg and B. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 176 (1894).

Egg Plant--Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895).

Emigrant's Movables-Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 85 (1894).

Envelopes-Wolf Bros. v. Allegheny Valley Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 40

(1897).

Extracts—Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903). Farina-F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894).

Feed-Re Fremont E. and M. V. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 293 (1895); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902). Fencing Central Y. P. Assoc. v. Illinois Cent. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 519 (1905).

Fertilizer-Savannah Bureau of F. & T. v. Charleston & S. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 458 (1897).

Flooring-Central Y. P. Assoc. v. Illinois Cent. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 519

(1905).

Flour-Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v. Flint & P. M. R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 393, 2 I. C. C. 553 (1889); In re Alleged Excessive Freight Rates, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 93, 4 I. C. C. 48 (1890); In re Freight Rates and Charges, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 151, 4 I. C. C. 116 (1890); King v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 272, 4 I. C. C. 251 (1890); Hezel Milling Co. v. St. Louis, A. & T. H. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 701, 5 I. C. C. 57 (1891); F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R., 6 1. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894); Chamber of Commerce v. Chicago, M. & S. P. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 481 (1898); New York Produce Exch. v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 612 (1898); Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 304 (1899); Re Export and Domestic Rates on Grain, 8 I C. C. Rep. 214 (1899); Pennsylvania Millers' State Assoc. v. Philadelphia & R. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 531 (1900); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902); Wichita v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 35 (1904); Aberdeen Group Commercial Assoc. v. Mobile & O. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 289 (1904).

Fresh Meats-Chicago L. S. Exch. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 428 (1905).

Fruit-Boston F. & P. Exch. v. New York & N. E. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 493, 4 I. C. C. 664 (1890); Re Transportation of Fruit, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 360 (1904); Consolidated Forwarding Co. v. Southern Pac. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 590 (1905).

Fur Scraps-Myer v. Cleveland, C. & S. L. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 78 (1901). Furniture-Potter Mfg. Co. v. Chicago & G. T. Ry., 4 Int. Com. Rep. 223, 5 I. C. C. 514 (1892).

Gable Ornaments-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Galvanized Iron-Business Men's League of St. Louis v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 330 (1903).

Glass-Southern P. & G. Co. v. Lake Erie & W. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 284

(1894).

Glue, Goatskins-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903).

Grain-Detroit Board of Trade v. Grand T. Ry., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 199, 2 I. C. C. 315 (1888); In re Alleged Excessive Freight Rates, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 93, 4 I. C. C. 48 (1890); Re Fremont E. & M. V. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 293 (1895); Alleged Unlawful Rates and Practices, 7 I. C. C. Rep. 33 (1897); Paine Bros. v. Lehigh Valley R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 218 (1897); Alleged Unlawful Rates and Practices, 7 I. C. C. Rep. 240 (1897); Suffern v. Indiana D. & W. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 255 (1897); Chamber of Commerce v. Chicago, M. & S. P. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 481 (1898); New York Produce Exch. v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 612 (1898); Listman Mill Co. v. Chicago, M. & S. P. Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 47 (1898); Kemble v. Boston & A. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 110 (1899); Grain Shippers' Assoc. v. Illinois Cent. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 158 (1899); Board of Railroad Comrs. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 304 (1899); Pennsylvania Millers' State Assoc. v. Philadelphia & R. R. R., 8 I. C. C. 531 (1900); Diamond Mills v. Boston & Maine R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 311 (1903); In the Matter of Proposed Advances in Freight Rates, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 382 (1903); Mayor and City Council of Wichita v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 534 (1903); Aberdeen Group Commercial Assoc. v. Mobile & O. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 289 (1904); Cannon Falls Farmers' Elevator Co. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 650 (1905).

Grain Products-McMorran v. Grand T. Ry., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 604, 3 I. C. C. Rep. 252 (1889).

Grass Hooks, Grind Stones-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 330 (1902).

Grille Work-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Hair-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903). Hardware-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 318, 328 (1902).

Hatters' Furs-Myer v. Cleveland, C. & S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 78 (1901).

Hay-Behlmer v. Memphis & C. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 257 (1894); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902); H. B. Pitts & Son v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 691 (1905.

Hemp, Hides-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903).

Hogs--Squire v. Michigan Cent. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 515, 4 I. C. C. 611 (1891); Chicago L. S. Exch. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 428 (1905).

Hollow Ware-Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce v. Southern Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 118 (1904).

Hominy-F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894).

Honey-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903). Horse Cards-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 330 (1902).

Horses-Barrow v. Yazoo & M. V. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 333 (1904). Household Goods-Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 85 (1894).

Ice-Ulric v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 495 (1903). Interior Trimmings-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Iron--Cordele Machine Shop v. Louisville & N. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 361 (1895); Colorado F. & I. Co. v. Southern Pac. Co., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 488 (1895); Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 318, 327 (1902); Re Proposed Advances in Freight Rates, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 382 (1903).

Iron Pipe Fittings-Trade League of Phila. v. Philadelphia, W. & B. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 368 (1899).

Joists-Central Y. P. Assoc. v. Illinois Cent. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 519

(1905).

Laths-Michigan Box Co. v. Flint & P. M. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 335

(1895).

Lemons-Roth v. Texas & P. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 602 (1903); Consolidated F. Co. v. Southern Pac. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 509 (1905).

Liquors Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902).

Live Stock-Cattle Raisers' Assoc. v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 513 (1898); Sayles v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 492 (1903); Chicago L. S. Exch. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 428 (1905).

Lumber-Missouri & I. T. & L. Co. v. Cape Girardeau & S. W. Ry.,

1 Int. Com. Rep. 292, 1 I. C. C. 30 (1887); Farrar v. East Tenn., V. & G. Ry., 1 Int. Com. Rep. 765, 1 I. C. C. 480 (1888); James v. East Tenn., V. & G. Ry., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 609, 3 I. C. C. 225 (1889); Eau Claire Board of Trade v. Chicago, M. & S. P. Ry., 4 Int. Com. Rep. 65, 5 I. C. C. 264 (1892); Michigan Box Co. v. Flint & P. M. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 335 (1895); Hilton Lumber Co. v. Wilmington & W. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 17 (1901); National W. L. D. Assoc. v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 98 (1901); Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 318 (1902); Marten v. Louisville & N. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 581 (1903); Wichita v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 569 (1903); G. C. Pratt Lumber Co. v. Chicago, I. & L. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 29 (1904); Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905); Mershon S. P. & Co. v. Central R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 456 (1905); Central Yellow Pine Assoc. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 193 (1904); Central Yellow Pine Assoc. v. Illinois C. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 505 (1905); Tift v. Southern Ry. Co., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 548 (1905).

Machinery-Red Cloud Min. Co. v. Southern Pac. Co., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 216

(1902).

Manufactured Articles-Freight Bureau v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 195 (1894).

Mattress Material-Murphy v. Wabash R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 725, 5 I. C. C. 122 (1891).

Meal In re Alleged Excessive Freight Rates, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 93, 4 I. C. C. 48 (1890).

Meats-Chicago L. S. Exch. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 429

(1905).

Melons-Loud v. South Caroilna Ry., 4 Int. Com. Rep. 205, 5 I. C. C. 529 (1892); Board of Railroad Comrs. v. Florence Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 1 (1898).

Milk-Howell v. New York, L. E. & W. R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 162, 2 I. C. C. 272 (1888); Milk Producers' Protective Assoc. v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 92 (1897); Brockway v. Ulster & D. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 21 (1898).

Mill Stuff-Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v. Flint & P. M. R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 393, 2 I. C. C. 553 (1889).

Mohair-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606

(1903).

Molasses-Johnston-Larimer D. G. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 568 (1896); Calloway v. Louisville & N. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 431 (1897); Phillips v. Louisville & N. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 93 (1898); Danville v. Southern Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 409 (1900).

Mules Barrow v. Yazoo & M. V. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 333 (1904). Oatmeal-F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894).

Oats-In re Alleged Excessive Freight Rates, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 93, 4 I. C. C. 48 (1890); Paine v. Lehigh Valley R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 218 (1897); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902); Aberdeen Group Commercial Assoc. v. Mobile & O. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 289 (1904).

Oil-Nicolai v. Pennsylvania R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 78, 2 I. C. C. 131 (1888); In re Tank & Barrel Rates, 2 Int. Com. Rep. 245, 2 I. C. C. 365 (1888); Rice v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 298, 2 I. C. C. 389 (1889); Independent Refiners' Assoc. v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R., 4 Int. Com. Rep. 162, 5 I. C. C. 415 (1892); Independent Refiners' Assoc. v. Pennsylvania R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 52 (1894); Independent Refiners' Assoc. v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 378 (1895).

Onions-Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295

(1895).

Open-end Envelopes-Wolf Bros. v. Allegheny Valley Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 40 (1897).

Oranges-Railroad Comrs. v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 688, 5 I. C. C. 13 (1891); Consolidated Forwarding Co. v. Southern Pac. Co., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 182 (1902), 10 I. C. C. Rep. 590 (1905).

Packing-house Products-Squire v. Michigan Cent. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 515, 4 I. C. C. 611 (1891); In re Proposed Advances in Freight Rates, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 382 (1903); Chicago L. S. Exch. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 428 (1905).

Panel Jambs, Wainscoting and Ceiling, Pantry Fittings-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1904).

Paper Wrapping-Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902).

Peaches Georgia Peach Growers' Assoc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 255 (1904); Re Transportation of Fruit, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 360 (1904).

Pearl Barley-F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894).

Pease-Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295

(1894).

Phosphate Rock-Troy Board of Trade v. Alabama M. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 1 (1894).

Pig Iron-Poughkeepsie Iron Co. v. New York C. & H. R. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 248, 4 I. C. C. 195 (1890); Cordele Machine Shop v. Louisville & N. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 361 (1895).

Pilasters--Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1904).

Pineapples-Roth v. Texas & P. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 602 (1903).

Porch Columns, Newels and Railings, Portiere Work-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).