That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the ConstitutionChristopher Wolfe Princeton University Press, 2009 M02 9 - 256 páginas The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving other issues (even those of rights) to the democratic process? |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-2 de 2
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Contenido
1 | |
10 | |
20 | |
CHAPTER 3 Casey at the BatTaking Another Swing at Planned Parenthood v Casey | 37 |
The Vices of the Judges Enter a New Stage | 59 |
CHAPTER 5 Judicial Power and the Withering of Civil Society | 85 |
CHAPTER 6 The Academy the Courts and the Culture of Rationalism | 97 |
CHAPTER 7 Judicial Moral Expertise and RealWorld Constraints on Judicial Moral Reasoning | 118 |
CHAPTER 8 Toward a More Balanced History of the Supreme Court | 141 |
CHAPTER 9 Judicial Review and Republican Government Jeremy Waldron | 159 |
Supreme Legislator or Prudent Umpire? | 181 |
CHAPTER 11 The Rehnquist Court and Conservative Judicial Activism | 199 |
Index | 225 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution Christopher Wolfe Vista previa limitada - 2009 |
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution Christopher Wolfe Sin vista previa disponible - 2004 |
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution: Judicial ... Christopher Wolfe Sin vista previa disponible - 2004 |