That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the ConstitutionChristopher Wolfe Princeton University Press, 2009 M02 9 - 256 páginas The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving other issues (even those of rights) to the democratic process? |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 34
... respect properly owed to the judiciary as a coordinate branch of government—to treat the Supreme Court as the final or ultimate authority on constitutional issues is to resign our self-government into the hands of “that eminent tribunal ...
... respect, it could be said that the central question about judicial power today is how to limit it effectively in order to reestablish a full measure of republican government in the United States. It should not be surprising that this ...
... doubt” is something deeper than precedent: “the authoritativeness and supremacy of the judiciary's interpretive function, not respect for precedent, is the operative concern.” The Court is the vehicle by Introduction • 3.
... respect for what was once thought to be a distinctive American value, what Justice Black called 'the right of each man to participate in the self government of his society.'” Repudiation of various judicial doctrines is necessary to ...
... respect the elementary condition of being with others, which is both the essence of republican politics and the principle of mutual recognition that lies at the heart of the idea of citizenship. Keith E. Whittington writes in response ...
Contenido
1 | |
10 | |
20 | |
CHAPTER 3 Casey at the BatTaking Another Swing at Planned Parenthood v Casey | 37 |
The Vices of the Judges Enter a New Stage | 59 |
CHAPTER 5 Judicial Power and the Withering of Civil Society | 85 |
CHAPTER 6 The Academy the Courts and the Culture of Rationalism | 97 |
CHAPTER 7 Judicial Moral Expertise and RealWorld Constraints on Judicial Moral Reasoning | 118 |
CHAPTER 8 Toward a More Balanced History of the Supreme Court | 141 |
CHAPTER 9 Judicial Review and Republican Government Jeremy Waldron | 159 |
Supreme Legislator or Prudent Umpire? | 181 |
CHAPTER 11 The Rehnquist Court and Conservative Judicial Activism | 199 |
Index | 225 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution Christopher Wolfe Vista previa limitada - 2009 |
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution Christopher Wolfe Sin vista previa disponible - 2004 |
That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution: Judicial ... Christopher Wolfe Sin vista previa disponible - 2004 |