Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

which to your own mind deal with these questions satisfactorily, or, rather, will you kindly direct Messrs. to send to me the

6

book or books you may recommend, with others which I have ordered from them? Among the rest, I have sent for HENGSTENBERG's book on the Pentateuch, which I see commended in a remarkable article in the Quarterly on Essays and Reviews.' That article, however, appears to me to shrink from touching the real question at issue, and, instead of meeting the Essayists with argument, to be chiefly occupied with pitying or censuring them. Certainly, there are not a few points, on which I differ strongly from those writers. But I cannot think it to be a fair way of proceeding to point out, as the apparent consequence of the course they are pursuing, that it will necessarily lead to infidelity or atheism. It may be so with some; must it, therefore, be so with all? The same, of course, might have been said, and probably was said, freely, and just as truly, by the Jews of St. Paul and others, and, in later times, by members of the Romish Church of our own Reformers. Our duty, surely, is to follow the Truth, wherever it leads us, and to leave the consequences in the hands of God. Moreover, in the only instance, where the writer in the Quarterly does attempt to remove a difficulty, he explains away a miracle by a piece of thorough'neologianism,'-I mean, where he accounts for the sun 'standing still,' at the word of Joshua, by referring to one of the thousand other modes, by which God's mighty power could have accomplished that miracle, rather than by the actual suspension of the unbroken career of the motion of the heavenly bodies in their appointed courses,' which last the Bible plainly speaks of to a common understanding, though the writer seems not to believe in it.*

* So, too, Archd. PRATT writes, Scripture and Science not at variance, p. 25,- The accomplishment of this [miracle] is supposed by some [N.B.] to have been by the arresting of the earth in its rotation. In what other words, then, could the miracle have been expressed? Should it have been said, 'So the earth ceased to revolve, and made the sun appear to stand still in the midst of heaven?' This is not the language we should use, even in these days of scientific light. Were so great a wonder again to appear, would even an astronomer, as he looked into the heavens, exclaim, "The earth stands still!'? Would he not be laughed at as a pedant? Whereas, to use the language of appearances, and thus to imitate the style of the Holy Scriptures themselves, would be most natural and intelligible.'

It will be observed that Archd. PRATT does not commit himself to maintaining the above view he says, 'it is supposed by some' to have been accomplished thus. But he argues as if this explanation were possible, and not improbable; that is to say, he lends the weight of his high position and mathematical celebrity to the support of a view, which every natural philosopher will know to be wholly untenable. For,-not to speak of the fact, that, if the earth's motion were suddenly stopped, a man's feet would be arrested, while his body was moving at the rate (on the equator) of 1,000 miles an hour, (or, rather, 1,000 miles a minute, since not only must the earth's diurnal rotation on its axis be stopped, but its annual motion also through space), so that every human being and animal would be dashed to pieces in a moment, and a mighty deluge overwhelm the earth, unless all this were prevented by a profusion of miraculous interferences,-one point is at once fatal to the above solution. Archd. PRATT quotes only the words, 'So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day;' and, although this is surely one of the most prominent questions, in respect of which it is asserted that Scripture and

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

'After reading that article, I felt more hopelessly than ever how hollow is the ground upon which we have so long been standing, with reference to the subject of the Inspiration of Scripture. I see that there is a very general demand made upon the clerical authors of Essays and Reviews,' that they should leave the Church of England, or, at least, resign their preferments. For my own part, however much I may dissent, as I do, from some of their views, I am very far indeed from judging them for remaining, as they still do, as ministers within her pale,-knowing too well, by my own feelings, how dreadful would be the wrench, to be torn from all one has loved and revered, by going out of the Church. Perhaps, they may feel it to be their duty to the Church itself, and to that which they hold to be the Truth, to abide in their stations, unless they are formally and legally excluded from them, and to claim for all her members, clerical as well as lay, that freedom of thought and utterance, which is the very essence of our Protestant religion, and without which, indeed, in this age of advancing science, the Church of England would soon become a mere dark prison-house, in which the mind both of the teacher and the taught would be fettered still with the chains of past ignorance, instead of being, as we fondly believed, the very home of religious liberty, and the centre of life and light for all the land. But, whatever may be the fate of that book or its authors, it is surely impossible to put down, in these days, the spirit of honest, truthseeking, investigation into such matters as these. To attempt to do this, would only be like the futile endeavour to sweep back the tide, which is rising at our very doors. This is assuredly no time for such trifling. Instead of trying to do this, or to throw up sandbanks, which may serve for the present moment to hide from our view the swelling waters, it is plainly our duty before God and Man to see that the foundations of our faith are sound, and deeply laid in the very Truth itself.

"For myself, if I cannot find the means of doing away with my present difficulties, I see not how I can retain my Episcopal Office, in the discharge of which I must require from others a solemn declaration, that they 'do unfeignedly believe all the Canonical Scriptures of the Old and New Testament,' which, with the evidence now before me, it is impossible wholly to believe.*

Science are at variance,' he dismisses the whole subject in a short note, and never even mentions the moon. But the Bible says,The sun stood still, and the moon stayed,' Jo.x.13; and the arresting of the earth's motion, while it might cause the appearance of the sun standing still,' would not account for the moon' staying.'

It is impossible not to feel the force of Archd. PRATT's own observation, p.30, 'The lesson we learn from this example is this: How possible it is that, even while we are contending for truth, our minds may be enslaved to error by long-cherished prepossessions!'

*This was written before the recent decision of the Court of Arches, viz. that the above words must be held only to imply a bonâ fide belief that the Holy Scriptures

[ocr errors]

'I need not say to you that, whatever support and comfort I may feel in the consciousness of doing what appears to be right, it would be no light thing for me, at my time of life, to be cast adrift upon the world, and have to begin life again under heavy pressure and amidst all unfavourable circumstances,-to be separated from many of my old friends, to have my name cast out as evil even by some of them, and to have it trodden under foot, as an unclean thing, by others, who do not know me,-not to speak of the pain it would cause me to leave a work like this, which has been committed to me in this land, to which my whole heart and soul have been devoted, and for which, as it seemed, God had fitted me in some measure more than for others,work in which I would joyfully still, if it please God, spend and be spent.

[ocr errors]

'But God's Will must be done. The Law of Truth must be obeyed. I shall await your reply, before I take any course, which may commit me in so serious a matter. And I feel that I shall do right to take time for careful deliberation. Should my difficulties not be removed, I shall, if God will, come to England, and there again consult some of my friends. But then, if the step must be taken, in God's Name I must take it; and He Himself will provide for me future work on earth, of some kind or other, if He has work for me to do.'

The above letter I wrote, but did not forward, in the early part of 1861. I had not then gone so deeply into the question as I have done since. And, as I do not wish to be misunderstood by some, whom I truly esteem and love, to whom I owe all duty and respect, but allegiance to the Truth above all,—I may here say that, at the time when I took counsel with my Episcopal Brethren at the Capetown Conference in January, 1861, I had not even begun to enter on these enquiries, though I fully intended to do so on my return to Natal. Then, however, I had not the most distant idea of the results at which I have now arrived. I am sensible, of course, that, in stating this, I lay myself open to the objection, that the views, which I now hold, are comparatively of recent date, and, having been adopted within less than two years, may be found after a while untenable, and be as quickly abandoned. I do not myself see any probability or possibility of this, so far as the main question is concerned, viz. the unhistorical character of the story of the Exodus, which is exhibited in the First Part of this work. But, however this may be, I have thought it right to state the simple truth. And, though

contain everything necessary to salvation, and that to that extent they have the direct sanction of the Almighty,'-by which, of course, the above conclusion is materially affected.

these views are, comparatively speaking, new to me,—and will be new, as I believe, to most of my English readers, even to many of the Clergy, of whom, probably, few have examined the Pentateuch closely since they took Orders, while parts of it some of them may have never really studied at all,—yet I am by this time well aware that most of the points here considered have been already brought forward, though not exactly in the present form, by various continental writers, with whom the critical and scientific study of the Scriptures has made more progress than it has yet done in England.*

Some, indeed, may be ready to say of this book, as the Quarterly says of the Essayists, 'the whole apparatus is drawn bodily from the German Rationalists.' This, however, is not the case; and I will, at once, state plainly to what extent I have been indebted to German sources, in the original composition of this work. Having determined that it was my duty, without loss of time, to engage myself thoroughly in the task, of examining into the foundations of the current belief in the historical credibility of the Mosaic story, I wrote to a friend in England, and requested him to send me some of the best books for entering on such a course of study, begging him to forward to me books on both sides of the question, 'both the bane and the antidote.' He sent me two German works, EWALD (Geschichte des Volkes Israel, 7 vols.) and KURTZ (History of the Old Covenant, 3 vols.), the former in German, the latter in an English translation (Clark's Theol. Libr.), and a book, which maintains the traditionary view, of the Mosaic origin and historical accuracy of the Pentateuch, with great zeal and ability, as will be seen by the numerous extracts which I have made from it in the body of this work. On receiving these books, I laid, for the present, EWALD on the shelf, and devoted myself to the close study of KURTZ's work,-with what result the contents of this volume will show. I then grappled with EwALD'S book, and studied it diligently, the parts of it, at least, which concern the O.T. history. It certainly displays an immense amount of erudition, such as may well entitle it to be called, as in the Ed. Review on 'Essays and Reviews,' a 'noble work.' But, with respect to the Pentateuch, anyone, who is well acquainted with it, will perceive that my conclusions, on many important points, differ materially from EWALD'S. Besides these, I had, at first, two books of HENGSTENBERG, on the Psalms and on the Christology of

* HENGSTENBERG is very fond of representing almost all his opponents as followers of DE WETTE :-They supply themselves very freely from his stores, and have made scarcely the least addition to them.' Pent.ii.p.3. This is, of course, intended to diminish the force of their multiplied testimony, and to reduce it to the single voice of DE WETTE. But the same difficulties, if they really exist, must, of course, occur to all, who bring a fair and searching criticism to bear upon the subject, however they may differ in their mode of stating them.

the O.T. And these comprised the whole of my stock of German Theology, when the substance of my First Part was written. Since then, however, and while rewriting it with a view to publication, DE WETTE'S Einleitung, and BLEEK's excellent posthumous work, Einleitung in das A. T., have come into my hands. I have also carefully studied the most able modern works, written in defence of the ordinary view, such as HENGSTENBERG'S Dissertations on the Genuineness of the Pentateuch, HÄVERNICK's Introduction to the O.T., &c., with what effect the contents of the present work will show. At a still later period, I have been able to compare my results with those of KUENEN, in his Historisch-Kritisch Onderzoek, of which Part I, on the Historical Books of the O. T., has just been published at Leyden, (Sept. 1861,)—a work of rare merit, but occupied wholly with critical and historical questions, such as do not come into consideration at all in the First Part of the present work. And, since my return to England, I have had an opportunity of consulting Dr. DAVIDSON's Introduction to the O. T., Vols. I and II, the most able work which has yet appeared in England on the subject of Biblical Criticism.

It will be observed that I have quoted repeatedly from KURTZ, HENGSTENBERG, &c., as well as from English works of eminence, written in support of the ordinary view. I have made these quotations on principle, in order that the reader may have before him all that, as far as I am aware, can be said by the best writers on that side of the question, and may perceive also that I have myself carefully considered the arguments of such writers, and have not hastily and lightly adopted my present views; and I have often availed myself of their language, in illustration of some point occurring in the course of the enquiry, as being not only valuable on account of the information given on good authority, but liable also to no suspicion of having been composed from my own point of view, for the purpose of maintaining my argument.

Being naturally unwilling in my present position, as a Bishop of the Church, to commit myself even to a friend on so grave a subject, if it could possibly be avoided, I determined to detain my letter when written, for a time, to see what effect further study and consideration would have upon my views. At the end of that time,-in a great measure, by my being made more fully aware of the utter helplessness of KURTZ and HENGSTENBERG, in their endeavours to meet the difficulties, which are raised by a closer study of the Pentateuch,-I became so convinced of the unhistorical* character of very considerable portions of

I use the expression 'unhistorical' or 'not historically true' throughout, rather than fictitious,' since the word 'fiction' is frequently understood to imply a conscious dishonesty on the part of the writer, an intention to deceive. Yet, in writing the

« AnteriorContinuar »