...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.1 1 Sherman v. Rochester and Syracuse RR, 17 NY, 156 ; Russell ». Hudson River RR, id., 136;...

...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable, employee." The rule, as stated, was adhered to in Armstrong v. Catawissa Railroad, 13 Wright 186, but...

...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. § 1971. An employer must in all cases indemnify his employee for losses caused by the former's...

...negligence of anofher person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. 1 To such cases the rule of respondeat superior does not apply, unless there has been want...

...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, (a) unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe." (b) Article 1,007: "An employer must in all cases indemnify his employe' for losses caused by his own...

...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe.'" And: "But, gentlemen, if you find from the evidence that the defendant company was guilty of negligence...

...negligence of another person employed by the same employee in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in. the selection of the culpable employee." But we cannot see that the section of the statute above quoted has changed in any respect...

...of the negligence of another employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless tlio negligence causing the injury was committed in the...the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in tKe selection of the culpable employé, n master is not liable for injuries to a servant caused by...

...of another person emnloyed by the snme emplover in the same general business, unless the négligence causing the injury was committed in the performance of a duty the employer owes by law to the employe1, * * * * provided, nevertheless, that the employer shall he liable for such injury when the...

...causing the injury was caused in the performance of a duty the employer owes bj law to the employee, or unless the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. The principal or employer shall, however, be responsible for injuries caused by the negligence...