THE JOURNAL AND RECORD OF THE LAW AND THE LAWYERS. FROM NOVEMBER 1871 ΤΟ APRIL 1872. VOLUME LII. LONDON: PUBLISHED AT THE OFFICE OF THE LAW TIMES, SBLETTE 11.4 FEB 1962 LIBRARY LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY HORACE COX, AT THE LAW TIMES OFFICE, WELLINGTON-STREET, STRAND. INDEX TO NOTES OF THE WEEK. Abbott v. The Bakers' and Confectioners' Tea Accidental Death Insurance Company, The, v. Ackford v. Barelli and another, 67 Ackland's Trusts, re, 346 Alexander v. Campbell, 479 Alexander v. Van der Zee, 83 Allen v. Gott, 344 Allen v. Miller and others, 292 Allsop v. Wheatcroft, 63 Amherst's Will, re Lady, 211 Anderson v. Anderson, 249 Armitage v. Armitage, 229 Arrowsmith v. Chandler, 270 Chorlton v. Overseers of Stretford, 82 Askew v. The Sewer Authority of Ulverston and Chorlton (app.) v. The Overseers of Tonge (resps.), the Ulverston Local Board, 425 Aston v. Meredith, 386 Attorney, re An, 251 Attorney-General v. Akers, 310 Attorney-General, The, v. Barker, 232 Attorney-General v. Campbell and others, 477 Attorney-General and Colbeck and Marriot v. The 387 Attorney-General v. Fletcher, 115 Attorney-General v. Stewart, 365 Attorney-General v. The Great Eastern Railway Contract Corporation (Limited) (Gooch's case), Company, 211, 309, 478 60, 134, 288 Cramer and Co., re; ex parte Sangster, 63 Belfast Tramways Company (Limited), re The, Crossely, ex parte; re Taylor, 329 Atty v. Etough, 328 Austin v. Austin, 68 Royal Insurance Company, 232 Barber, re, 212 Barrett's Estate, re, 61 Bateson v. Gosling, 45 Beak v. Beak, 386 Beattie v. Lord Ebury, 347 212, 309 Bendle v. Watson, 65 Betts v. Cleaver, 386 Biggs v. Foster, 289 Biggs v. Upton, 248 Bignold's Settlement Trust, re, 288 Crouch v. Tregonning, 269 Cruikshank v. Duffin, 310 Curling v. Walters, 79 Darnell v. Hunter, 79 Davies and Wife v. Solomon, 82 Birkenhead Benefit Building Society, re The, 366 Dawson v. Robinson, 27 Bradley v. Sylvester, 44 Breton, Baillie, In the Goods of, 459 Briscoe's Trusts, 310 British Columbia, and Vancouver Island Spar, Lumber, and Saw Mill Company (Limited), (Stamp's Claim), 62 Britton v. The Great Western Cotton Company, 269 Day v. Day, 311 Deanes v. Kitchin, 290 De Lancey v. The Queen, 292 Dewhurst, ex parte; re Vanlohe, 134 Dobson v. Dobson and Barber, 233 Dudley Union (apps.) v. Wolverhampton Union resps.), 250 Dyte v. The St. Pancras Board of Guardians, 232 Buckhurst (app.) v. The Guardians of Chatham Else v. Else, 210 Buchanan, In the Goods of, 310 (resps.), 231 Buckley (app.) v. Weigley (resp.), 66 Burley v. Saint, 289 Burr v. Miller, 347 Burrell v. Maxwell, 135 Burrows v. The March Gas and Coke Company (Limited), 291 Busby v. The Corporation of Leeds, 289 Buxton v. Rust, 45 Byrne v. Guano Consignment Company, 251 Emerson, ex parte; re Hawkins, 46 English Assurance Company, re, The (Holdich's case), 458 European Assurance Society, re The, 479 Hanson v. The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company, 212 Hardy v. The Metropolitan Land and Finance Company (Limited), 309 Harrison v. The Bank of Australasia, 232 Haselfoot's Estate, re (Chauntler's claim), 249 Hawkes, ex parte, re Keely, 249 Hayes v. Oatley, 478 Haymen v. Gover, 231 Head v. Tattersall and another, 66 Hemming v. Maddiek, 26, 364 Hercules Insurance Company (Limited), re The, Hext v. Gill, 386 Heyman, ex parte; re Heyman, 385 Hicks v. Ross, 386 Higgs v. Dorkis, 212 Hill v. Cock; Poltimore, Lord, r. Cock, 231 Holmes v. Albright, 81 European Assurance Society, re The; ex pa te Honey, ex parte; re Jeffery, 114 Huckle v. Piper, 82 Hudson v. Walker, 253 European Bank (Limited), re, (Masters's case), 61, Hunter v. Bullock, 346 345 Hunter v. Walters, 79 Justices of Lancashire, The, v. The, Lords of the Keane v. Keane, 136 Kemp v. The Great Eastern Railway Company, 62 228 Kent v. Stokes, 229 Kilvert's Trusts, re, 134 King and wife, ex parte; re P. and W. 251 Kirk v. The Queen; The Attorney-General v. Knaresborough Union (apps.) v. Pately Bridge Labouchere v. Dawson, 229 Langham, J. N., In the Goods of, 252 Laws, W., In the Goods of, 459 Lee v. Lee, 328 Leigh . Adams, 65 Lethbridge v. Adams; ex parte The Liquidator of Lewis v. Lewis, 67 THE LAW TIMES. Meyricke Fund, re The, 211 Mollett and others v. Robinson, 293 Moule v. Garrett and others, 292 Nanteos Consols Mining Company, re (Thomas's Narraway v. Beattie (Cama's Estate), 365 Nesham v. Selby, 365 Newby v. Von Oppen and others, 269 Noakes v. Barlaw, 293 North British and Mercantile Assurance Company v. North-Eastern Railway Company (app.) Nott's Trusts, re, 478 Page, ex parte, re Page and Springall, 46 Palmer and others v. Fox, 66 Panthea, The, 28 Pappa v. Rose, 28 Parker's estate, re, 135 Parkes v. Parkes, 99 Parnell, in the Goods of, 366 Patent Bread Machinery Company; re, ex parte Patent Floor Cloth Company (Limited), re The, Llynvi Coal and Iron Company, ex parte, re Hide, Peck v. Gurney, 26 60 Lockwood v. Jenkinson, 64 London Gas Light Company (Limited), re, The ; ex London and Mediterranean Bank (Limited), re London and Suburban Bank v. Walkinshaw, 81. Longley v. Longley, 134 Loyd v. Spence, 212 Loyd v. Fleming, 212 Lucas v. Siggers, 385, 405 Luckes ex parte, re Wood, 308 Lumley v. Victor, 136 Lundy Granite Company (Limited), re, (Harvey Lyons, ex parte, re Lyons, 477 Pennock v. Pennock, 80 Phillips v. The Great Western Railway Company, Phosphate of Lime Company v. Pilcher v. Rawlings, 248 Green and Pooley, ex parte; re Sir William Russell, 406 Porter, ex parte; re Porter, 114 Pottesco Marble Company (Limited), re, 135 Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Company (Limited), 290 Pride v. Bubb, 59 Prosser v. The Bank of England, 310 Radford v. Willis, 41 Sargent v. Sargent, 99 Scharf, In the Goods of, 387 Shearman v. British Empire Mutual Assurance Shepherd, In the Goods of, 252 Shepherd v. The Midland Railway Company, 233 Sheffield Improved Industrial and Provident Sidebotham, In the Goods of, 213 Simey v. Dixon, 82 Sinnet v. Herbert, 210 Singer v. Audley, 211 Simpson (app) v. Wells (resp.), 250 Sleeman v. Wilson, 26 Smith v. Farrah, 115 Smith v. Myers and another, 83 Southampton Imperial Hotel Company (Limited), Swift, ex parte; re Sir William Russell, 308 Tait, Sir Peter, and Co., ex parte, re Lynch, 293 Tait, Sir Peter, ex parte, re Tait and Co., 214 Telford v. Metropolitan Board of Works, 328 Tepper, In the Goods of, 213 Thwaites v. Tibbits, 67 Toleman v. Reed, 293 Tomkins v. Tomkins, 366 Townsend v. The Overseers of the Poor of St. Turner, re Mary Anne, 251 United Ports and General Insurance Company, re United Ports and General Insurance Company, re Valparaiso Waterworks Company, re (Davies's Vigar v. Dudman, 293 Wadmore v. Dear, 66 Wadmore v. The Overseers of Putney, 66 Walker v. Walker, 25 Ward v. Martin, 232 Ward v. Wolverhampton Waterworks Company,27 Ravensford v. Ravensford, Smith and Withey, 311 Webster v. The Mayor, &c., of Halifax, 42 Rayner, ex parte; re Johnson, 364 Reg. v. Justices of Flintshire, 63 Reg. v. Justices of Surrey and others, 251 Reg. v. The Vestry of St. Luke's, Chelsea, 83 Rennison v. Walker and another, 291 Republic of Liberia, The, v. The Imperial Bank Wilson v. Newberry, 63 Richards v. Gellatly and others, 251 Wilson v. O'Leary, 364 Wilson v. Wilson and Howell, 213 Wilson v. Wilson and Stowell, 68, 293 Woodcock's Settled Estate, re, 43 Woodhams v. Woodhams, 44 Wotherspoon and another v. Currie, 477 |