« AnteriorContinuar »
JOHN LORD ELD O N,
LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR OF GREAT BRITAIN,
ETC. ETC. ETC.
MY LORD, WHEN I first ventured to send an Edition of these Reports into the world, a diffidence of my pretensions, and an apprehension of bringing a discredit upon any one, to whom I might address it, discouraged me from publishing it under the protection of any name.
But the favourable reception with which this work has been honoured, and the good opinion which your Lordship has been pleased to entertain of it, have excited in me a hope that my endeavours may not have been entirely unsuccessful; and have encouraged me with less apprehension humbly to offer to your Lordship, as a small mark of my respect and veneration, the result of those labours, which were begun and considerably proceeded in during the time your Lordship presided in the court of Common Pleas, with so much honour to yourself, and advantage to the community.
As your Lordship is one of those characters who are as solicitous for the concealment, as the performance of good actions, I shall not avail myself of this occasion to dwell upon your Lordship’s distinguished qualities and talents, but beg leave to subscribe myself with the greatest sincerity and respect,
Jemot v. Cowley
Dean and Chapter of Bristol, v.
Jevens v. Harridge & Uzor 1. 6. 8.
104. 111 Jones v. Pope
Doughty v. Neal
Duppa, Executor of Baskerville, v.
The King v. Dickenson 134, 135
The King v. Sutton
The King v. Opie and Dodge & al.
Eccleston & Uzor, Executors of Cas-
tle v. Clipsham
153 | The King v. Kilderby 308. 311
R Lake v. King
P. 120. 131 | Redman v. Edolph - - P. 317
Sanders's Case - - 262, 263
Skinner v. Lyon and Leason 228 Manchester & al. v. Vale - 23. 27 - v. Andrews - - 163. 169 Mellor v. Spateman . 339. 343 Smith v. Yeomans - - 316 Merchant v. Driver, Administrator of Stennel v. Hogg . . 220. 226 Rowe
- - 303. 306 Mounson v. Redshaw · 186. 196
т Thursby & al. v. Plant - 230. 237 Took v. Glascock - - 250. 260
Toomes, Administrator of Toomes, v. Osborne v. Rogers, Executor of Weston | Etherington
. 353. 361 264. 267 Turbill's Case - - 67
- 323. 326
Veale v. Warner Peacock v. Bell and Kendal
69. 73 Pitt v. Knight - - 86.97
w Pomfret v. Ricroft - - 321 Wade v. Bache . Pordage v. Cole
319 Wheatley v. Lane Potter v. North - - 347. 350 Wright v. Ramscot
. 144. 149
216 - 82. 84
NAMES OF CASES
IN BOTH VOLUMES.
Adams v. Meredew, ii. 101 gg.
- v. Radway, ii. 45 l. AARONS v. Williams, ii. 101 l. - v. Savage, i. 275. ii.9 f. 11 h. Abbot v. Burton, i. 278 e.
210 f. 210 g. - v. Smith, i. 154 b. 291 d. Adamson v. Jervis, i. 228. Abercrombie v. Parkhurst, i. 347 a. Adderley v. Wise, i. 247 a. Abington v. Lipscomb, ii. 47 l. 168 c. Addey v. Wooley, ii. 84 b. Abitbol v. Bristow, i. 202 i. 203 c. Addis v. Power, ii. 94 b.
203 e. Addison v. Gray, ii 293 a. Ablett v. Ellis, ii. 101 n.
v. Overend, i. 291 g. 291 m. ii. Abney v. White, i. 9 c. ii. 60.
117 a. 210 e. 396. Abrahams v. Bunn, i. 294, 295 b.
- v. Round, ii. 47 h. Absor v, French, ii. 161.
Adnam v. Wilks, ii. 101 g. Acherley v. Vernon, i. 215. 277 b. 277 h. African Co. v. Mason, ii. 414.
286. ii. 156 c. Agassiz v. Palmer, ii. 68 b. Ackerley v. Parkinson, i. 74 d.
Aires y Hardress, ii. 68 g. Ackers v, Phipps, ii. 388 o.
Aireton v. Davis, ii. 47 ff. Ackland v. Lutley, ii. 11 e.
Aischome v. Spelholme, hundred of, - v. Pring, ii. 11 e.
ii. 376 a. Acourt v. Swift, ii. 101 s.
Aitcheson v. Cargey, ii. 293 6. Acraman v. Cooper, ii. 47 i.
Aitkenhead v. Blades, ii. 5 h. Acton v. Baldwin, ii. 9+ d.
Alban's case, ii. 96. - v. Blundell, ii. 114 6. 400 a. - St. D. of, v. Shore, i. 320 d. 320 e. - v. Hill, i. 117.
Alchin v. Hopkins, ii. 137 l. Adam v. Bristol, ii. 378 d.
- y. Wells, ji. 47 a. - v. Inhabitants of Bristol, i. 217c. Alchinbrook v. Hall, ii. 137 h.
64.6. Alcock v. Blofield, i. 33 b. 118. ii. 291. Adams v. Bankart, ii. 61 o.
Aldenburgh v. Peaple, i. 236 e. — v. Broughton, ii. 47 dd.
Alder v. Parke, i. 333 b. - v. Dansey, i. 211 b.
| Aldred v. Constable, i. 47 bb. v. Freeman, i. 91 a.
Aldridge v. Buller, ii, 148 a. v. Gibney, i. 322 c.
- v. Haines, i. 263 a.
- v. Harper, i. 195 k.
Aleberry v. Walby, i. 233 a. 235.