Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

257

Page

Page Grosman v. Union Trust Co., 228 Fed. 610, 143 C. Head Money Cases, 112 U. S. 580, 595, 6 Sup. Ct. C. A. 132, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 613. 147 27, 28 L. Ed. 798..

495 Grossmayer, In re, 177 U. S. 48, 49, 50, 20 Sup. Heath v. Layne, 62 Tex. 686. Ct. 535, 44 L. Ed. 665..

.409, 448 Heckman v. U. S., 224 U. S. 413, 32 Sup. Ct. 424, Grove, in re, 180 Fed. 63, 103 C. C. A. 416. 272 56 L. Ed. 820...

287 Gsell v. Insular Collector of Customs, 239 U. S. Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175, 36 Sup. Ct. 78, 60 93, 36 Sup. Ct. 39, 60 L. Ed. 163.. 514 L. Ed. 206, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 287.

60 Guaranty Sav. Bank v. Bladow, 176 U. S. 448, Helm v. Zarecor C. 213 Fed. 648; 222 U. S.

453, 454, 20 Sup. Ct. 425, 44 L. Ed. 540.. 115 32, 36, 32 Sup. Ct. 10. 56 L. Ed. 77.. .256, 422 Guinn v. U. S., 238 U. S. 347, 366, 35 Sup. Ct. 926, Hendricks v. Ü. S., 223 U. S. 178, 184, 32 Sup. Ct. 59 L. Ed. 1340, L. R. A. 1916A, 1124.. 126 313, 56 L. Ed. 394..

.10, 190 Gumbel v. Pitkin, 113 U. S. 545, 5 Sup. Ct. 616, Hendrickson v. Apperson, 245 U. S. 105, 38 Sup. 28 L. Ed. 1128......

134
Ct. 44, 62 L. Ed.

46

Henry v. A. B. Dick Co., 224 U. S. 1, 32 Sup. Ct. Hailes v. Van Wormer, 20 Wall. 353, 368, 22 L. 364, 56 L Ed. 645, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 880....260, 487 Ed. 241.

..549, 550

Hervey V. Rhode Island Locomotive Works, 93 Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291, 301, 27 Sup. Ct. 281, U. S. 664, 23 L. Ed. 1003..

343 51 L, Ed. 490.

.63, 189 Heydenfeldt, The, 93. U. S. 634, 23 L. Ed. 995. 137 Hairston v. Danville & W. R. Co., 208 U. S. 598, Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold & Silver Min. Co., 607, 28 Sup. Ct, 331, 52 L. Ed. 637, 13 Ann. Cas. 93 U. S. 634, 23 L. Ed. 995.

137 1008 ..113, 248 Hide, In re, L. R. 7 Ch. 28..

214 Hale v. Allinson, 188 U. S. 56, 23 Sup. Ct. 244, Hilgers v. Hilgers (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 47 L. Ed. 380. 456 851

257 Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43, 59, 60, 26 Sup. Ct. Hill, Ex parte, 38 Ala. 429.

165 370, 50 L. Ed. 652..

.32, 169, 420

Hill v. American Surety Co., 200 U. S. 197, 201, Hall v. De Cuir, 95 U. S. 485, 508. 24 L Ed. 26 Sup. Ct. 168, 169, 60 L. Ed. 437.

251 547

19 | Hill v. Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co., 135 C. C. A. 417, Hallett v. Arapahoe County, 40 Colo. 308, 318, 90 219 Fed. 719..

82 Pac, 678. 511 Hill v. Kuhlman, 31 C. C. A. 87, 87 Fed. 498....

48 Hallett's Estate, in re, 13 Ch. D. 696. 2 Hill v. U. S., 9 How. 386, 13 L. Ed. 185..

174 Hallowell v. Commons, 239 U, S. 506, 36 Sup. Hipolite Egg Co. v. U. S., 220 V. S. 45, 57, 31 Ct. 202, 60 L. Ed. 409.

223 Sup. Ct. 364, 367, 55 L.Ed. 364... .220, 530, 534 Hamilton Co. v. Massachusetts, 6 Wall. 632, 18 Hiscock v. Mertens, 205 U. S. 202, 27 Sup. Ct. L. Ed. 904. 64 488, 51 L. Ed. 771.

37 Hamilton Gas Light Co. v. Hamilton City, 146 Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell (C. C.)

U. S. 258, 13 Sup. Ct. 90, 36 L. Ed. 963.. 248 172 Fed. 963; (D. C.) 202 Fed. 512; 241 U. S. Hammel & Co., In re, 221 Fed, 56, 137 C. C. A. 644, 36 Sup. Ct. 450, 60 L. Ed. 1218; 245 U. S. 80

229, 38 Sup. Ct. 65, 62 L. Ed. --.

..66, 77, 81, 82, 85 Hancock Nat. Bank v. Farnum, 176 U. S. 640, 20 Hohorst, In re, 150 U. S. 653, 14 Sup. Ct. 221, 37 Sup. Ct. 506, 44 L. Ed. 619. 455 L. Ed. 1211..

448 Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, Hoke v. U. S., 227 U. S. 308, 321, 322, 323, 33 Sup. 30 Sup. Ct. 326, 54 L. Ed. 482.

.10, 190

Ct. 281, 57 L. Ed. 523, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 906, Hanover Nat. Bank v. Moyses, 186 U. S. 181, Ann. Cas. 1913 E, 905.

.531, 534 188, 189, 190, 192, 22 Sup. ct. 857, 46 L. Ed. Holbrook v. Aldrich, 168 Mass, 15, 16, 46 N. E. 1113

217, 219

115, 36 L. R. A. 493, 60 Am. St. Rep. 364. 436 Hanson v. Davison, 73 Minn, 454, 462, 76 N. W. Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366, 391, 18 Sup. Ct. 254

453
383, 42 L. Ed. 780..

18 Hardaway v. Semmes, 24 Ga. 305.

177 Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U. S. 756, 765, 6 Sup. Ct. 233 U. S. 536, 541, 34 Sup. Ct. 661, 58 L Ed. 771, 28 L. Ed. 1141.. .369, 451 1083

.191, 221, 425 Hardin v. Jordan, 140 U. S. 371, 382, 11 Sup. Ct. Hollo, In re (D. C.) 206 Fed. 852.

121 808, 838, 35 L. Ed. 428.

.22, 305 Holmes & Hallowell Co. v. Great Northern R. Hardin v. Shedd, 190 U. S. 508, 519, 23 Sup. Ct. Co., 37 Interst. Com. R., 627, 630, 637, 645, 685, 47 L. Ed. 1156.

22
649

..552, 553 Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 84, 25 Sup. Ct. Holt v. U. S., 218 U. S. 245, 248, 252, 31 Sup. Ct. 176, 49 L. Ed. 394..

222 2, 54 L. Ed. 1021, 20 Ann, Cas. 1138.. .169, 420 Harkness v. Hyde, 98 U. S. 476, 479, 25 L. Ed. 237 67 Holy Trinity Church v. U. S., 143 U. S. 457, 464, Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U. S. 148, 163, 164, 19 12 Sup. Ct. 511, 36 L. Ed. 226..

.29, 528 Sup. Ct. 119, 43 L. Ed. 399.

462 Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Los AngeHarley v. U. S., 198 U. S. 229, 25 Sup. Ct. 634, les, 227 U. S. 278, 33 Sup. Ct. 312, 57 L. Ed. 510 88 49 L. Ed. 1029..

273 Hopkins v. Clemon College, 221 U. S. 636, 31 Sup. Harmon v. U. S., 223 Fed. 425, 139 C. C. A. 19.152 Ct. 654, 55 L. Ed. 890, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 243 205 Harriman v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Hopkins v. Ellington & Guy, 246 U. S. 655, 38 211 U. S. 407, 29 Sup. Ct. 115, 53 L. Ed. 253.. 33

Sup. Ct. 423, 62 L. Ed.

430 Harriman v. Northern Securities Co., 197 U. S. 244, 287, 25 Sup. Ct. 493, 49 L. Ed. 739.

Hopkins v. Lee, 6 Wheat. 109, 113, 5 L. Ed. 218 93

83 Harris v. Barber, 129 U. S. 366, 369, 9 Sup. Ct.

Houston, E. & W. T. R. Co. v. U. s., 234 U. S. 314, 32 L. Ed. 697..

520

342, 34 Sup. Ct. 833, 58 L. Ed. 1341....174, 460, 553 Harris v. Cosby, 173 Ala. 81, 55 South. 231.

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Goodrich, 141 C. C. 422 A. 264, 226 Fed. 434.

141 Harris v. Louisville, 165 Ky, 559, 177 S. W, 472, Ann, Cas. 1917B, 149.

Howe_v. Weymouth, 148 Mass. 605, 606, 607, 20 17

N. E. 316. Harter v. Kernochan, 103 U. S. 562, 566, 26 L. Ed.

285 411

Hubbard v. Tod, 171 U. S. 474, 494, 19 Sup. Ct.

256 Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Ibs, 237 U. S. 662, 35

14, 43 L. Ed. 246...

496 Sup. Ct. 692, 59 L. Ed. 1165, L. R. A. 1916A,

Huguley Mfg. Co. v. Galeton Cotton Mills, 184 U. 765

64
S. 290, 22 Sup. Ct. 452, 46 L. Ed. 546..

132 Hart v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 112 U. S. 331, 5

Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, Sup. Ct. 151, 28 L. Ed. 717..

58 L. Ed. 1557. 355

334 Hartranft v. Mullowny, 43 App. D. C. 44.

519

Hull v. Palmer, 213 N. Y. 315, 107 N. E. 633; Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co., 244 U. S.

155 App. Div. 636, 140 N. Y. Supp. 811.

104 294, 37 Sup. Ct. 506, 61 L. Ed. 1148.

184

Humphreys v. McKissock, 140 U. S. 304, 312, 11 Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 22 Sup. Ct. 49,

Sup. Ct. 779, 35 L. Ed. 473..

543 46 L Ed. 117.

7

Hunt v. New York Cotton Exch., 205 U. S. 322, Hastings Malting Co. v. Iron Range Brewing

27 Sup. Ct. 529, 51 L. Ed. 821.

438 Co., 65 Minn, 28, 31, 67 N. W. 652.

457

Hutchinson v. Rowan, 57 N. J. Law, 530, 31 Atl. 224

521 Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U, S. 197, 23 Sup. Ct. 787, 47 L. Ed. 1016..

192

Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran, 188 U. S. 691, Hawes v. Glover, 126 Ga. 305, 317, 55 S. E. 62,

23 Sup. Ct. 456, 47 L. Ed. 657

321 67

177

Hyde v. McFaddin, 72 C. C. A. 655, 140 Fed. 433, 442

496 Hawkins v. Glenn, 131 U. S. 319, 9 Sup. Ct. 739, 33 L. Ed. 184.

455

Hyde v. Shine, 199 U. S. 62, 85, 25 Sup. Ct. 766, Hawley v. Diller, 178_ U. S. 476, 484, 488, 20 Sup.

50 L. Ed. 90......

520 Ct. 986, 990, 44 L. Ed. 1157...

.101, 115 Hawley v. Malden, 232 U. S. 1, 13, 34 Sup. Ct. Ibanez v. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp., 201, 58 L. Ed. 477, Ann. Cas. 1916C, 842....... 40

246 U. S. 621, 38 Sup. Ct. 410, 62 L. Ed.

413 Hayes v. Manning, 263 Mo. 1, 172 S. W. 897.... 422

Icaza v. Ortega, 5 Phil. Rep. 166....

514 Hays v. Gauley Mountain Coal Co., 247 U. S. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.,

189, 38 Sup. Ct. 470, 62 La Ed. .......473, 542 226 U. S. 441, 33 Sup. Ct. 176, 57 L Ed. 290.... 221

Page

Page Illinois Cent. R. R. v. Interstate Commerce Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. 8. 823, 38 Sup. Ct. 319, Commission, 206 U. S. 441, 454, 27 Sup. Ct. 700, 62 L. Ed.

.360, 552 51 L. Ed. 1128. 392 | Ivey's Adm'r v. Owens, 28 Ala. 641, 649.

369 Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Louisiana Railroad Com

mission, 236 U. S. 157, 163, 35 Sup. Ct. 275, 59 Jacobs v. Southern R. Co., 241 U. S. 229, 235, L. Ed. 517... 439 36 Sup. Ct. 588, 60 L. Ed. 970...

140 Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co., 244 U. S. Japhet v. Pullen, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 157, 133 S. 376, 37 Sup. Ct. 614, 61 L. Ed. 1206. .252, 430 W. 441, 445...

257 Illinois Surety Co. v. U. s., 240 V. S. 214, 218, Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co., 134 U. S. 178, 221, 224, -36 Sup. Ct. 321, 60 L. Ed. 609..62, 251, 334, 189, 10 Sup. Ct. 518. 33 L. Ed. 872.

304 335, 430 Jeffers v. Fair, 33 Ga. 347..

165 Income Tax Cases, 148 Wis. 456, 134 N. W. 673, Jefferson v. Cook (Okl.) 155 Pac. 852.

516 135 N. W. 164.....

499 Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Blagg, 235 U. S. 571, 576, 35 Independent Breweries Co., 259 Mo. 153, 168 S. Sup. Ct. 167, 59 L. Ed. 364..

344 W. 687.. 125 Jenne v. Joslyn, 41 Vt. 478, 484.

72 Indiana v. Kentucky, 136 U. S. 479, 510, 514, Jennings, Ex parte, 6 Cow. (N. Y.) 542, 16 Am. 518, 10 Sup. Ct. 1051, 34 L. ED. 329; 159 'U. S. Dec. 447.

305 275, 16 Sup. Ct. 320, 40 L. Ed. 149; 163 U. S. 620, Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch, 164, 3 L. Ed. 303.. 103 16 Sup. Ct. 1162, 41 L. Ed. 250; 167 U. S. 270, Jersey City Printing Co. v. Cassidy, 63 N. J. Eq. 17 Sup. Ct. 999, 42 L. Ed. 164. .304, 402 759, 767, 53 Atl. 230.

73 Indiana Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co., 22 Jewett v. U. S., 100 Fed. 832, 810, 41 C. C. A. 88, Colo. 513, 45 Pac, 444, 55 Am. St. Rep. 149.... 283 53 L. R. A. 568..

382 Indiana Road Mach. Co. v. Keeney, 147 Mich. Jim Butler Tonopah Min. Co. v. West End Con184, 110 N. W. 530..

101 sol. Mining Co., 39 Nev: 375, 158 Pac. 876..574, 575 Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State

Johannessen v. U. S., 225 U. S. 227, 238, 32 Sup. of Oklahoma, 240 U. S. 522, 36 Sup. Ct. 453,

Ct. 613, 56 L. Ed. 1066..

121 60 L. Ed. 779.

426 Johnson v. Christian, 125 U. S. 642, 645, 8 Sup. Intermountain Rate Cases, 234 U. S. 476, 34 Sup.

Ct. 989, 1135, 31 L. Ed. 820..

43 Ct. 986, 58 L. Ed. 1408.

.....142, 165 Johnson v. District of Columbia, 31 Ct. Ci, 395.. 322 International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. Wm. Johnson v. Gearlds, 234 U. S. 422, 34 Sup. Ct. Cramp & Sons Co. (C. C.) 176 Fed. 925; 127 C.

794, 58 L. Ed. 1383.

333 C. A. 522, 211 Fed. 124; 151 C. C. A. 500; (D.

Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, 33 Sup. Ct. 240, C.) 232 Fed. 166; (C. C. A.) 238 Fed. 564.. 272

57 L. Ed. 497.

166 International Harvester Co. V. Kentucky, 234 Johnson v. Lankford, 245 U. S. 541, 38 Sup. Ct. U. S. 579, 34 Sup. Ct. 944, 58 L. Ed. 1479....235, 342 203, 62 L Ed.

206 International Harvester Co. v. McAdam, 142

Johnson v. Riddle, 240 U. S. 467, 481, 36 Sup. Ct. Wis. 114, 124 N. W. 1042, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.)

393, 60 L. Ed. 752..

116 774, 20 Ann. Cas. 614.

148 Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co., 196 U. S. 1, 20, International Paper Co. v. Com., 228 Mass. 101,

25 Sup. Ct. 158, 49 L Ed. 363..

528 117 N, E. 246.

293 Johnson v. Wells Fargo & Co., 239 U. S. 234, International Paper Co. v. Massachusetts, 246 U.

243, 36 Sup. Ct. 62, 60 L. Ed. 243.

512 S. 135, 38 Sup. ct. 292, 62 L. Ed. -..296, 298, 361,

Johnston v. Bowersock, 62 Kan, 148, 61 Pac. 740 57 445

Jonas Glass Co. v. Glass Bottle Blowers' Ass'n, International Postal Supply Co. v. Bruce, 194

77 N. J. Eq. 219, 223, 79 Atl. 262, 41 L. R. A. U. S. 601, 24_Sup. Ct. 820, 48 L. Ed. 1134.... 273

(N. S.) 445...

74 International Text Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91,

Jones v. Andrews, 10 Wall. 327, 333, 19 L. Ed.

935 106, 107, 30 Sup. Ct. 481, 54 L. Ed. 678, 27 L.

48 R.A. (N. S.) 493, 18 Ann. Cas. 1103......87, 296

Jones v. Meehan, 175 U. S. 1, 29-32, 20 Sup. Ct International Trust Co. v. Weeks, 203 U. S. 364,

1, 44 L, Ed. 49..

516 27 Sup. Ct. 69, 51 L. Ed. 224.

214
Jones v. Portland, 113 Me. 123, 93 Atl. 41.

113 International & G. N. R. Co. v, Anderson Coun

Jones v. U. S., 137 U. S. 202, 212, 11 Sup. Ct. 80, ty (Tex. Civ. App.) 174 S. W. 305; 106 Tex. 60,

83, 34 L. Ed. 691....

..310, 311, 313 156 S. W. 499...

Jones Nat. Bank v. Yates, 240 U. S. 541, 552, Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert, 239 U. S.

36 Sup. Ct. 429, 60 L. Ed. 788.

554 560, 566, 567, 36 Sup. Ct. 168, 60 L. Ed. 439.. 424, 554, Jory : Supreme Council A. L. H., 105 Cal. 20,

570

30, 38 Pac. 524, 26 L. R. A, 733, 45 Am. St. Rep.

17 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama

...521, 525 Jose v. Damian, 14 Phil. Rep. 104.

514 Midland Ry., 168 U. S. 144, 170, 18 Sup. Ct. 45, 42 L. ED. 414...

Jover y Costas v. Insular Government, 221 U. S. 389 623, 31 Sup. Ct. 664, 55 L. Ed. 884..

47 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird, 124 U. S. 25, 24 Sup. Ct. 563, 48 L, Ed. 869.

Joy v. St. Louis, 201 U. S. 332, 342, 26 Sup. Ct. 32 478, 50 L. Ed. 776.

315 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore &

Julian v. Central Trust Co., 193 U. S. 93, 113, 24 0. R. R., 145 U. S. 263, 277, 278, 279, 280, 12 Sup.

Sup. Ct. 399, 48 L Ed. 629

462 Ct. 844, 36 L. Ed. 699. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, B.

& Q. R. Co., 186 U. S. 320, 336, 22 Sup. Ct. 824, Kalkhoff v. Nelson, 60 Minn. 284, 288, 62 N. W. 46 L. Ed. 1182.. ..388, 393 332

214 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, R.

Kansas v. Colorado, 185 U. S. 125, 22 Sup. Ct. I. & P. R. Co., 218 U. S. 88, 90, 103, 30 Sup. Ct.

552, 46 L. ED. 838; 206 U. S. 46, 93, 94, 27 Sup. 651, 656, 54 L. Ed. 946..

..32, 33, 50
Ct. 655, 51 L Ed. 956.

.56, 402 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich

Kansas City, etc., R. Co. v. Herman, 187 U. S.

239 Transp. Co., 224 U. S. 194, 32 Sup. Ct. 436, 56

63, 23 Sup. Ct. 24, 47 L. Ed. 76.. L. Ed. 729..

Kansas City, F. S. & M. R. Co. v. Kansas, 240

32 Interstate Commerce Commission V. Humboldt

U. S. 227, 36 Sup. Ct. 261, 60 L. Ed. 617... .87, 294 S. S. Co., 224 U. S. 474, 485, 32 Sup. Ct. 556,

Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 56 L. Ed. 849...

111, 118, 37 Sup. Ct. 58, 61 L. Ed. 176..87, 294, 298,

409 Interstate Commerce Commission

361, 446 v.

Illinois Cent. R. Co., 215 U. S. 452, 469, 470, 30 Sup.

Kansas City Ry. v. Kansas, 240 U. S. 227, 231, Ct. 155, 54 L. Ed. 280.

232, 235, 36 Sup. Ct. 261, 60 L. Ed. 617..127, 128, 361 ....123, 389, 392

Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Albers CommisInterstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R. R., 227 U. S. 88, 91, 33 Sup. Ct. 185,

sion Co., 223 U. S. 573, 596-598, 32 Sup. Ct. 316, 56 L. Ed. 556.......

221 57 L. Ed. 431...

-389, 392 Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Carl, 227 U. S. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Northern

639, 653, 33 Sup. Ct. 391, 57 L Ed. 683.. 221 Pac. R. Co., 216 U. S. 538, 544, 30 Sup. Ct. 417, Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Kaw Valley 54 L. Ed. 608.

....51, 397, 409, 456 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stickney, 215

Drainage Dist., 233 U. S. 75, 77, 34 Sup. Ct. 564, 58 L. Ed. 857....

57 U. S. 98, 108, 30 Sup. Ct. 66, 54 L. Ed. 112.... 557 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pac.

Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Leslie, 238 U.
S. 599, 35 Sup. Ct. 844, 59 L. Ed. 1478.

299 R. Co., 222 U. S. 541-547, 32 Sup. Ct.. 108, 56 L, Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. U. S., 231 U. S. Ed. 308.

.123, 389, 392 Interstate R. Co. v. Massachusetts, 207 U. S. 79,

423, 443, 444, 34 Sup. Ct. 125, 58 L. Ed. 296, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1.....

123 28 Sup. Ct. 26, 52 L. Ed. 111, 12 Ann. Cas. Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 555 ......5, 373 30 Sup. Ct. 406, 54 L. Ed. 340..

.62 222 Iowa v. Illinois, 147 U. S. 1, 13, 13 Sup. Ct. 239, Kansas Pac. R. Co. v. Dunmeyer, 113 U. S. 629,

37 L. Ed. 55; 151 U. S. 238, 14 Sup. Ct. 333, 5 Sup. Ct. 666, 28 L. Ed. 1122. 38 L. Ed. 145; 202 U. S. 59, 26 Sup. Ct. 571, Kansas Southern Ry. v. Carl,_227 U. S. 639, 654, 50 L. Ed. 934.... ....303, 304, 307, 402 657, 33 Sup. Ct. 391, 57 L. Ed. 683.

355

371

Page

Page Kaw Valley Dralnage Dist. v. Kansas City Lahey v. Lahey, 174 N. Y. 146, 66 N. E. 670, 61 Southern R. Co., 87 Kan. 272, 276, 123 Pac. L. R. A. 791, 95 Am. St. Rep. 554......

624 991

57 Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. v. Smith, 173 U. S. Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. v. Missouri Pac. R. 684, 693, 699, 19 Sup. CL 565, 669, 43 L. Ed. Co., 99 Kan. 188, 202, 161 Pac. 937.. 67 858

..3, 5, 6 Kean v. Calumet Canal Co., 190 U. 8. 452, 459, Lamar v. U. S., 240 U. S. 60, 65, 36 Sup. Ct. 255, 23 Sup. Ct. 651, 47 La Ed. 1134...

22
6C L. Ed. 626.

159 Keller v. U. S., 213 U. S. 138, 144, 145, 146, 29 Sup. Lane v. Mickadiet, 241 U. S. 201, 208, 209, 36 Ct. 470, 53 L. Ed. 737, 16 Ann. Cas. 1066.. 532

Sup. Ct. 599, 60 L. Ed. 956.

510 Kelley v. Aarons (D. C.) 238 Fed. 996.

38

Lane v. Watts, 234 U. S. 525, 34 Sup. Ct. 965, 58 Kemmler. In re, 136 U. S. 436, 10 Sup. Ct. 930, L. Ed. 1440; 235 U. S. 17, 35 Sup. Ct. 3, 59 34 L. Ed. 519.

321
L. Ed. 104.

510 Kempton v. Burgess, 136 Mass. 192.

129

Lane County v. Oregon, 7 Wall. 71, 76, 19 L. Ed. Kennebec Water Dist. v. Waterville, 97 Me. 185,

101

532 205, 54 Atl. 6, 60 L. R. A. 856..

283 Lange, Ex parte, 18 Wall. 163, 166, 21 L. Ed. 872.. 520 Kennedy v. Gibson, 8 Wall. 498, 19 L. Ed. 476.. 90 Lankford v. Platte Iron Works, 235 U. S. 461, 35 Kennedy v. Gorman, 4 Cranch, C. C. 347, 348, Sup. Ct. 173, 59 L. Ed. 316..

205 Fed. Cas. No. 7702.

..520, 521

La Roque v. U. S., 239 U. S. 62, 68, 36 Sup. Ct. Kensington, The, 183 U. S. 263, 22 Sup. Ct. 102, 22, 60 L. Ed. 147.

368 46 L. Ed. 190..

148 Lascelles v. Georgia, 148 U. S. 537, 13 Sup. Ct. Keokee Coke Co. v. Taylor, 234 U. S. 224, 34 Sup. 687, 37 L. Ed. 549.

42 Ct. 856, 58 L. Ed. 1288...

252 Lathrop Lumber Co. v. Alabama Great Southern Keokuk R. R. v. Scotland County, 152 U. 8. 318, R. Co., 27 Interst, Com. R. 250.

553 322, 14 Sup. Ct. 605, 38 L. Ed. 457.

670 Lathrop, Shea & Henwood Co. v. Interior Const. Keokuk & W. R. R. v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 301, Co., 215 U. S. 246, 30 Sup. Ct. 76, 64 L. Ed. 177.. 239 314, 14 Sup. Ct. 605. 38 L. Ed. 457.

670 Laughlin v. Portland, 111 Me. 486, 496, 500, 90 Atl. Ker v. Illinois, 119 U. S. 436, 7 Sup. Ct. 225, 30 218, 322, 324, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1143, Ann. L Ed. 421.. 109 Cas. 1916C, 734.

..113, 114 Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306, 25 L. Ed. Lawless v. Raddis, 36 Okl. 616, 129 Pac. 711.... 435 999

146 Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co., Key, In re, 189 U. S. 84, 23 Sup. Ct. 624, 47 L 104 C. C. A. 475, 479, 182 Fed. 35, 39, 32 L, R. A. Ed. 720.

267
(N. S.) 274..

329 Kibbe v. Benson, 17 Wall. 62A, 21 L. Ed. 741... 121 L. D. Willcutt & Sons Co. v. Driscoll, 200 Mass. Kidd v. Alabama, 188 U. S. 730, 732, 23 Sup. Ct. 110, 117, 85 N. E. 897, 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1236.. 73 401, 47 L. Ed. 669.....

40 Leary v. U. S., 144 C. C. A. 70, 229 Fed. 660; 224 Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1, 21, 9 Sup. Ct. 6, 32 U. S. 567, 32 Sup. Ct. 599, 56 L. Ed. 889, Ann. L. Ed. 346.

.531, 632
Cas. 1913D, 1029.

1 Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233, 26 Sup. Ct. 27, 56 Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93, 28 Sup. Ct. 30, L. Ed. 167.

...10, 60
52 L. Ed. 118.

.191, 221, 425 Kile & Morgan Co. V Deepwater R. Co., 15 Lee, In re (D. C.) 236 Fed. 987..

152 Interst. Com. R. 235, 533.

410 | Lee Wilson & Co. v. U. S., 142 C. C. A. 351, 227 Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512, 524, 9 Sup. Ct. Fed. 827

21 355, 32 L. Ed. 764..

279

Lee Wong Hin v. Mayo, 153 C. C. A. 294, 240 King v. Buskirk, 231 U. S. 735, 34 Sup. Ct. 316, 58

Fed. 368..

208 L. Ed. 460..

122 Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Baltimore & O. King v. Hardwick, 11 East, 678, 585, 589.

72

S. W. R. R., 35 Interst. Com. R. 14, 17... 50
King v. Mullins, 171 U. S. 404, 18 Sup. Ct. 925, 43 Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Barlow, 244 U. S. 183,
L. Ed. 214...

122
37 Sup. Ct. 515, 61 L. Ed. 1070.

62 King v. Panther Lumber Co., 171 U. 8. 437, 18 Lehon v. Atlanta, 242 U. S. 53, 56, 37 Sup. Ct. 70, Sup. Ct. 573, 43 L. Ed. 227. 122 61 L. Ed. 145...

560 King v. West Virginia, 216 U. S. 92, 30 Sup. Ct. Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S. 100, 108, 10 Sup. Ct. 225, 54 L. Ed. 396..

122
681, 34 L. Ed. 128,

.410, 534 Kingsbury, Case of, 106 Mass. 223.

43 | Leloup v. Mobile, 127 U. S. 640, 648, 8 Sup. Ct. Kinnanno v. State, 106 Ark, 286, 290, 153 S. W. 1383, 32 L. Ed. 311..

128 262

304 | Lennon, In re, 150 U. S. 393, 14 Sup. Ct. 123, 37 Kinney v. Columbia Sav., etc., Ass'n, 191 U. S. 78, L. Ed. 1120..

118 24 Sup. Ct. 30, 48 L. Ed. 103...

131 Lentz, Ex'r, v. Fritter, 92 Ohio St. 186, 194, 195, Kidney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U. S. 110 N. E. 637....

.524, 525 43, 35 Sup. Ct. 236, 59 L. Ed. 457.

448 Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Moser (Tex. Civ. Kirby v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co., 120 U. S. 130, App.) 159 S. W. 1018.

431 136, 7 Sup. Ct. 430, 30 L. Ed. 569.

573

Lewis v. Hawkins, 23 Wall. 119, 127, 23 L. Ed. Kirkman v. Phillips' Heirs, 7 Helsk. (Tenn.) 222, 113

369 224

369 Lewis v. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co., 100 C. C. A. Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners, 42 N. J. Law, 510 521 137, 176 Fed. 549..

.66, 77 Kirtland v. Hotchkiss, 100 U. S. 491, 25 L.Ed. Liberman, In re (D. C.) 193 Fed. 301.

121 558

40 | Light v. U. S., 220 U. S. 523, 31 Sup. Ct. 485, 55 Kirwan v. Murphy, 189 U. S. 35, 23 Sup. Ct. 599, L. Ed. 570.....

.151, 327 47 L. Ed. 698..

610 Lindsley v. Natural Carbonio Gas Co., 220 V. S. Knapp v. Milwaukee Trust Co., 216 U. S. 645, 61, 78, 31 Sup. Ct. 337, 55 L. Ed. 369, Ann. Cas. 548, 30 Sup. Ct. 412, 54 L. Ed. 610.. 218 1912C, 160

64 Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey, 177 U. S. 638,

Linger v. Balfour (Tex. Civ. App.) 149 S. W. 795 152 644, 648, 20 Sup. Ct. 824, 827, 44 L. Ed. 921. ...... 503

Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. U. S., 116 C. C. A. Kneedler v. Lane, 45 Pa. 238..

165

267, 196 Fed. 593; 121 C. C. A. 498, 203 Fed. 394 ; Knight v. Lane, 228 U, S. 6, 33 Sup. Ct. 407, 57

236 U. S. 574, 575, 576, 35 Sup. Ct. 440, 59 L. Ed.

725 L. Ed. 709... 100

.423, 573 Knights of Maccabees v. Sackett, 34 Mont. 357,

Lister v. Leather, 1 De G. & J. 361, 368.. 130 363, 86 Pac. 423, 115 Am. St. Rep. 532..

Litchfield v. Goodnow, 123 U. S. 549, 8 Sup. Ct.

524 Knights of Pythias V. Meyer, 198 U. S. 508, 25

210, 31 L. Ed. 199..

93 Sup. Ct. 754, 49 L. Ed. 1146.

342

Litchfield v, The Register, 9 Wall. 575, 577, 19 Enisely v. Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614, 630, 46 Atl. 861,

L. Ed. 681..

510 863, 50 L. R. A. 86.

127

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Board Knoxville Iron Co. v. Harbison, 183 U. S. 13, 22

of Assessors for Parish of Orleans, 221 U. S. Sup. Ct. 1, 46 L. Ed. 55.

10

346, 354, 355, 356, 31 Sup. Ct. 550, 55 L. Ed. 762, Kopel v. Bingham, 211 U. S. 468, 29 Sup. Ct. 190,

L. R. A. 1915C, 903..

..40, 41 53 L. Ed. 286..

192

Lloyd v. Dollison, 194 U. S. 445, 449, 24 Sup. Ct. Krell v. Codman, 154 Mass. 454, 28 N. E. 578, 14

703, 48 L. Ed. 1062.

285 L. R. A. 860, 26 Am. St. Rep. 260.

497

Llynvi Coal & Iron Co., Ex parte, L. R. 7 Ch. 28 214 Krippendorf v. Hyde, 110 U. S. 276, 281, 4 Sup. Ct.

Locke v. Stearns, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 560, 563, 35 27, 28 L. Ed. 145.

Am. Dec. 382.. 48

72 Kronprinzessin Cecilie, The, 244 U. S. 12, 22, 37

Locomobile Co. of America V. Com., 228 Mass. Sup. Ct. 490, 61 L. Ed. 960....

58
117, 117 N. E. 5...

298
Locomobile Co. of America v. Massachusetts, 246
U. S. 146, 38 Sup. Ct, 298, 62 L. Ed.

361 La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. U. S., 175 U. S. Loeb v. Columbia Tp., 179 U. S. 472, 21 Sup. Ct. 423, 498, 20 Sup. Ct. 168, 44 L. Ed. 223.

174, 45 L. Ed. 280.

10 Labette County Com'rs v. Moulton, 112 U. S. 217, Logan v. U. S., 144 U. S. 263-301, 12 Sup. Ct. 617, 5 Sup. Ct. 108, 28 L. Ed. 698.

72

403 36 L. Ed. 429. Ladies of Modern Maccabees v. Daley, 166 Mich.

..150, 271

Logan Counnty v. U. S., 169 U. S. 255, 261, 18 Sup. 542, 545, 131 N. W. 1127.....

Ct. 361, 42 L. Ed. 737..

159 38 SUP.CT.-38

..... 525

214

Page

Page Lombard v. West Chicago Park Commission, 181 McCray v. U. 8., 195 U. S. 27, 24 Sup. Ct. 769, U. S. 33, 42, 44, 45, 21 Sup. Ct. 507, 45 L. Ed. 49 L. Ed. 78, 1 Ann. Cas. 561.....

..533, 534 731.

.41, 126 McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L. Ed. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. Brooklyn, 166 679

.405, 432, 532 U. 9. 685, 17 Sup. Ct. 718, 41 L. Ed. 1165. 36 | McDermott v. Wisconsin, 228 U. S. 115, 128, 33 Looney v. Crane Co., 245 U. S. 178, 189, 38 Sup. Sup. Ct. 431, 57 L. Ed. 754, 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) Ct. 85, 87, 62 L. Ed. .294, 295, 298, 361, 445 984, Ann. Cas. 1915A, 39..

220 Looney v. Metropolitan R. Co., 200 Ú. S. 480, 487, MacFadden v. U. S., 213 U. 8. 288, 29 Sup. Ct. 26_Sup. Ct. 303, 50 L. Ed. 564.

536 490, 53 L. Ed. 801...

...10, 132, 315, 316 Lo Pong v. Dunn, 149 C. C. A. 56, 235 Fed. 510.... 208 Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239, 246, 23 Sup. Lorraine, Ex parte, 16 Nev. 63. 109 Ct. 105, 47 L. Ed. 159.

..333, 522 Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co., 137 Macfarland v. Byroes, 187 U. 9. 246, 23 Sup. Ct. Cal. 699, 70 Pac. 770... 357 107, 47 L. Ed. 162....

189 Lott v. Pittman, 243 U. S. 588, 591, 37 Sup. Ct. 473, McGinnis v. Friedman, 2 Idaho (Hasb.) 393, 17 61 L. Ed. 915.. 448 Pac. 635.

327 Lottawanna, The, 21 Wall. 558, 575, 22 L. Ed. 654.. 503 McGinnis v. California, 246 U. S. 91, 38 Sup. Ct. Louisiana v. Garfield, 211 U. s. 70, 29 Sup. Ct. 440, 62 L. Ed. 31, 63 L. Ed. 92.

574 | McGovern v. New York, 229 U. S. 363, 371, 33 Louisiana v. Mississippi, 202 U. S. 1, 49, 53, 26 Sup. Ct. 876, 57 L. Ed. 1228, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) Sup. Ct. 408, 571, 50 L. Ed. 913.. 304, 402 291

507 Louisiana v. New Orleans, 102 U. S. 203, 206, 26 McGowan v. Parish, 228 U. S. 312, 33 Sup. Ct. 521, L. Ed. 132... 45 57 L. Ed. 849.....

95 Louisiana Nav. Co. v. Oyster Commission of McGraw v. Union Trust Co., 135 Mich, 609, 98

Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 33 Sup. Ct. 78, 57 L. Ed. N. W. 390. 138

...7, 336 McGrew v. McGrew, 190 III. 604, 60 N. E. 861.... 525 Louisiana R. R. Commission v. Cumberland Tel. Mack v. Kime, 129 Ga, 1, 58 S. E. 184, 24 L. R. A.

& Tel. Co., 212 U. S. 414, 420-422, 29 Sup. Ct. (N. S.) 675. 357, 53 L. Éd. 577.....

123 McKay, v, Kalyton, 204 U. S. 458, 468, 27 Sup. Ct. Louisville v. Cumberland Tel. Co., 224 U. S. 346, 51 L. Ed. 566.

224 649, 664, 32 Sup. Ct. 572, 56 L. Ed. 934... 199 Mackayo v. Mallory, 24 C. C. A. 420, 79 Fed. 1, 2.. 267 Louisville City R. Co. v. Louisville, 8 Bush (Ky.) McKeighan v. Hopkins, 19 Neb. 33, 26 N. W. 614.. 451 415

378 McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. 118, 35 Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Behlmer, 175 U. S. 648, L. Ed. 893.

519 675, 20 Sup. Ct. 209, 44 L. Ed. 309.

392 McNaughton v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 344, 37 Sup. Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, 236, Ct. 178, 61 L. Ed. 352, Aon. Cas. 1917B, 801.. 192 24 Sup. Ct. 119, 48 L. Ed. 159.

96 McNichols v. Peise, 207 U. S. 100, 28 Sup. Ct. 58, Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Holloway's Adm'r, 163 52 L. Ed. 121..

Ky. 125, 173 S. W. 343; 168 Ky. 262, 181 S. W. McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 37, 13 Sup. Ct. 1126 380 3, 36 L. Ed. 869.

165 Louisville & N. Co. v. Kentucky, 183 U. S. Macy v. Browne (D. C.) 215 Fed. 456; 140 C. C. 503, 22 Sup. Ct. 95, 46 L. Ed. 298. 6 A. 45, 224 Fed. 359.

396 Louisville & N. R. R. V. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, Mager v. Grima, 8 How. 490, 494, 12 L. Ed. 1168.. 111

97. 35 Sup. Ct. 494, 59 L. Ed. 853, L. R. A. Maber v. Hibernia Ins. Co., 67 N. W. 283, 291.... 514 1915E, 665...

..221, 429

Mahon v. Justice, 127 U. S. 700, 8 Sup. Ct. 1204, Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 32 L. Ed. 283....

109 52, 53, 30 Sup. Ct. 676, 64 L. Ed. 921, 47 L. R. Main v. Aukam, 4 App. D. C. 51, 56.

T2 A. (N. S.) 84.

64 Maine v. Grand Trunk R Co., 142 U. s. 217, 12 Louisville & N. R. Co. V. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, Sup. Ct. 121, 163, 35 L. Ed. 994..

128 480, 31 Sup. Ct. 265, 65 L. Ed. 297, 34 L. R. A. Maish v. Arizona, 164 U, S. 599, 611, 17 Sup. Ct. (N. S.) 671...

.133, 488
193, 41 L. Ed. 567..

495 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. Mallinckrodt Works v. St. Louis, 238 U. S. 41, 49, 230, 236, 20 Sup. Ct. 620, 44 L. Ed. 747. 570 35 Sup. Ct. 671, 59 L. Ed. 1192.

308 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Stewart, 241 U. S. 261, Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 36 Sup. Ct. 586, 60 L. Ed. 989..

416 134, 137, 34 Sup. Ct. 874, 58 L. Ed. 1245.. Louisville & N. R. R. v. U. S. (Com. C.) 207 Fed.

10, 36, 60, 64, 189, 336 691; (D. C.) 225 Fed. 671 ; 242 U. S. 60, 37 Sup. Manigault v. Springy, 199 U. S. 473, 26 Sup. Ct. Ct. 61, 61 L. Ed. 152. .142, 390 127, 50 L. Ed. 274.

36 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Mankin v. Ludowici-Celadon Co., 215 U. S. 533, Co., 237 U. S. 300, 303, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 528, 30 Sup. Ct. 174, 176, 54 L. Ed. 315..

251 965

415 Mansfield, C. W. & L. M. R. Co, V. Swan, 111 Lovejoy v. Murray, 3 Wall, 1, 18, 18 L. Ed. 129.. 93 U. S. 379, 4 Sup. Ct. 510, 28 L. Ed. 462.. 117 Lowe y. Dalrymple, 117 Pa. 564, 568, 12 Atl. 567.. 72 Manson v. Williams, 213 U. S. 453, 29 Sup. Ct. 619, Lewe v. Fisher, 223 U. S. 95, 107, 32 Sup. Ct. 196, 53 L. Ed. 869.. 56 L. Ed. 364...

100 Manufacturers' R. Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Loyal, The, 123 C. C. A. 252, 204 Fed. 930........ 332 Co., 21 Interst. Com. R. 307, 308, 314, 316; 28 Lozano v. Tau Suico, 22 Phil. Rep. 16...

514

Interst. Ccm. R. 96-98, 100, 101, 103, 104-107, 103, Ludwig v. Western Union Tel. Co., 216 U. S. 146, 110; 32 Interst. Com. R. 102, 105...388, 389, 390, 394

30 Sup. Ct. 280, 54 L. Ed. 423........87, 294, 295, 298 Marconi Wireless Tel. Co. v. Com., 218 Mass. 658, Lumberman's Exchange of St. Louis v. Ander- 579, 106 N. E. 310, 319.

son & S. R. R. R., 24 Interst. Com. R. 220... 61 Marconi Wireless Tel. Co. v. Simon (D. C.) 227 Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. Knight, 217 U. Fed. 906; 145 C. C. A. 656, 231 Fed. 1021; 246 S. 257, 30 Sup. Ct. 505, 54 L. Ed. 757.

277 U. S. 46, 38 Sup. Ct. 275, 62 L. Ed. -..272, 277, 284 Lyle v. Patterson, ?28 U. S. 211, 215, 216, 33 Sup. Marin v. Augedahl, 32 N. D. 536, 156 N. W. 101.. 453 Ct. 480, 482, 57 L. Ed. 8C4

227 Markuson v. Boucher, 176 U. S. 184, 20 Sup. Ct. Lynch v. Hornby, 149 C. C. A. 657, 236 Fed. 661; 76, 44 L. Ed. 124. 247 U. S. 339, 38 Sup. Ct. 543, 62 L. Ed.

Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250, 34 Sup. Ct. 92, 540, 542, 544, 647 58 L. Ed. 206.

191 Lynch v. Turrish, 149 C. C. A. 649, 236 Fed. 653; Marshall v. Gordon, 243 U, S. 521, 542, 37 Sup. Ct. 247 U. S. 221, 38 Sup. Ct. 537, 62 L. Ed.

448, 454, 61 L. Ed. 881, L. R. A. 1917F, 279.. 563 538, 540, 544, 546 | Marshall & Michel Grain Co. v. St. Louis & S.

F. R. Co., 16 Interst. Com. R. 385.. McCabe v. Atchison, etc., R. Co., 235 U. S. 151, Marsh v. American Legion of Honor, 149 Mass. 35 Sup. Ct. 69, 59 L. Ed. 169.. 20 512, 21 N. E. 1070, 4 L. R. A. 382..

524 McCall y. California, 136 U. S. 104, 109, 10 Sup. Martin v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Macon, Ga., Ct. 881, 34 L. Ed. 391.

..128, 296 245 U. S. 513, 38 Sup. Ct. 176. 62 L. Ed. McCandless v. Pratt, 211 U, S. 437, 440, 29 Sup. Martin v. District of Columbia, 205 U. S. 135, 27 Ct. 144, 53 L. Ed. 271. 62, 191 Sup. Ct. 440, 51 L. Ed. 743.

508 McCaskill Co. v. U. S., 216 U. S. 504, 514, 30 Sup. Martin v. Nance, 40 Tenn. (3 Head) 649, 650. 306 Ct, 386, 54 L. Ed. 590.

221 Martin v. Texas, 200 U, S. 316, 320, 321, 26 Sup. McCaull-Dinsmore Co. v. Great Northern R. Co., Ct. 338, 60 L. Ed. 497..

169 41 Interst, Com. R. 178.

553 Martin's Adm'r v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 151 U. McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 278, 30 Sup. S. 673, 688, 691, 14 Sup. Ct. 533, 38 L. Ed. 311..131, 239 Ct. 501, 64 L. Ed. 762..

.62, 611 Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212, 224, 225, 26 Sup. McCoach v. Minehill R. Co., 228 U. S. 295, 300, Ct. 31, 50 L. Ed. 157. 33 Sup. Ct. 419, 57 L. Ed. 842..

468 Mary, The, 9 Cranan, 126, 146, 3 L. Ed. 678. 417 McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. 8. 432, 437, 29 Maryland v. West Virginia, 217 U. S. 1, 41, 30 Sup. Ct. 146, 53 L. Ed. 269.

..62, 222, 335 Sup. Ct. 268, 54 L. Ed. 645 ; 217 U. S. 577, 30 McCoy v. Union Elevated R. Co., 271 III. 490, 111 Sup. Ct. 630, 64 L. Ed. 688; 225 U. S. 1, 32 Sup. N. E. 517... 606 Ct. 672, 66 L. Ed. 955...

..304, 402 Ct. 932, 59 L. Ed. 1349....

568

Page

Pago Massachusetts v. Rhode Island, 12 Pet. 755, 9 L. Missouri v. Nebraska, 196 U. 8. 23, 34-36, 25 Sup. Ed. 1272.

402 Ct. 155, 158, 49 L. Ed. 372; 197 U. S. 577, 25 Masonic Benev. Ass'n v. Bunch, 109 Mo. 560, 19 Sup. Ct. 580, 49 L. Ed. 881..

.304, 305, 402 S. W. 25.

524 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Cade, 233 U. Ś. 642, Masonic Mut. Ben. Soc. V. Burkhart, 110 Ind. 34 Sup. Ct. 678, 58 L. Ed. 1135.

10 189, 194, 195, 10 N. E. 79, 11 N. E. 449..

524 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Elliott, 184 U. S. 530, Masonic Mut. Ben. Ass'n v. Tolles, 70 Conn. 537, 22 Sup. Ct. 446, 46 L. Ed. 673..

437 544, 40 Atl. 448.....

624. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Harris, 234 U. S. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U. S. 412, 419, 34 Sup. Ct. 790, 58 L. Ed. 1377, L. R. 485, 494, 20 Sup. Ct. 708, 44 L. Ed. 856.

83 A. 1915E, 942..

.10, 176, 416 Maxwell Land-Grant Case, 121 U. S. 325, 381, 7 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. U. S., 235 U.'S. 37, Sup. Ct. 1015, 30 L. Ed. 949.. 515 40, 33 Sup. Ct. 6, 59 L. Ed. 116.

138 Mayer v. Hellman, 91 U. S. 496, 23 L. Ed. 377.... 218 Missouri. K. & T. R. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 234 U. S. 749, 570, 576, 33 Sup. Ot. 135, 57 L. Ed. 355, Ann. 34 Sup. Ct. 674, 58 L. Ed. 1576; 236 U. S. 412, Cas. 1914B, 134.

.334, 335, 452 429. _35 Sup. Ct. 328, 59 L. Ed. 644, Ann. Cas.

Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Castle, 224 U. S. 541, 546, 1916B, 691... ...186, 511 32 Sup. Ct. 606, 56 L. Ed. 875..

190 Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134, 36 Sup. Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, Ct. 94, 60 L. Ed. 181,

.191, 221 283, 30 Sup. Ct. 330, 54 L. Ed. 472. . 124, 179 Merchants' Stock Co., In re, 223 U. S. 639, 32 Missouri Valley College v. Guthrie, 263 Mo, 52, Sup. Ct. 339, 56 L. Ed. 584.. 561 172 S. W. 909.

422 Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Minnesota Thresher Missouri & K. I. R. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185, Mig. Co., 90 Minn. 144, 149, 95 N. W. 767.. 454 32 Sup. Ct. 46, 56 L. Ed. 155...

336 Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co., 237 U. 8. Mitchell v. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co., 131 C. C. 618, 35 Sup. Ct. 708, 59 L. Ed. 1148.

334 A. (25, 214 Fed. 685, 714.

..66, 77, 81, 82, 83 Merrielles v. State Bank of Keokuk, 5 Tex. Civ. Mitchell v. D'olier, 68 N. J. Law (39 Vr.) 375, App. 483, 24 S. W. 564..... 148 384, 53 Atl. 467, 59 L. R. A. 949.

264 Merritt v. Welsh, 104 U. S. 694, 26 L. Ed. 896. 397 Mitchell Bros. v. Doyle (D. C.) 225 Fed. 437; Metropolitan Home_Tel. Co. v. Emerson, 202 149 C. C. A. 106; 235 Fed. 686, L. R. A. 1917E, Mass. 402, 88 N. E. 670... 202

467 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. New Orleans, 205 Momtt v. U. S., 63 C. C. A. 117, 128, Fed. 375.. 30

U. S. 395, 27 Sup. Ct. 499, 51 L. Ed. 853. 40 Monarch Elevator Co. y. Northern Pac. R. Co., Mexican Cent. Ry. v. Pinkney, 149 U. S. 194, 209, 133 Minn. 461, 157 N. W. 998..

552 13 Sup. Ct. 859, 37 L. Ed. 699...

67 Mononga hela Nav, Co. v. U. S., 148 U. S. 312, Meyer v. Wells Fargo & Co., 223 U. S. 298, 32 340, 341, 344, 13 Sup. Ct. 622, 37 L. Ed. 463.... 285 Sup. Ct. 218, 56 L. Ed. 445..

375 Montelibanoy Ramos v. La Compania General de Michigan Cent. R. R. v. Michigan R. Commis- Tabacos de Filipinas, 241 U. S. 455, 461, 36 sion, 236 U. S. 615, 631, 35 Sup. Ct. 422, 59 L Sup. Ct. 617, 60 L. Ed. 1099.

514 Ed. 750..

51 Montello Salt Co. v. Utah, 221 U. S. 452, 466, 31 Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. Sup. Ct. 706, 55 L. Ed. 810, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 589, 592, 593, 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 42 L. Ed. 591.

633

195 100, 115, 510 Moody & Thomas Milling Co. v. Akron, 93 Ohio Michigan Trust Co. v. Ferry, 228 U. S. 346, 353,

St. 484, 113 N. E. 835.

249 33 Sup. Ct. 550, 57 L. Ed. 867..

148 Moon v. Salt Lake County, 27 Utah, 435, 442, 76 Midland Valley R. Co. v. Griffith, 245 U. S. 633,

Pac. 222.

348 38 Sup. Ct. 133, 62 L. Ed. ; 245 U. S. 653, Moore-Mansfield Co. v. Electrical Co., 234 U. S. 38 Sup. Ct. 12, 62 L. Ed.

.133, 189, 192

619, 623, 624, 34 Sup. Ct. 941, 58 L, Éd. 1503. 507 Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, 243, 34

Moran v. Dunphy. 177 Mass. 485, 59 N. E. 125, Sup. Ct. 309, 58 L. Ed. 584..

73 .308, 424

52 La R. A. 115, 83 Am. St. Rep. 289. Miller v. Cornwall R. Co., 168 U. S. 131, 134,

Morrell v. Quarles, 35 Ala. 544..

109 18 Sup. Ct. 34, 42 L. Ed. 409,

222
Morrill v. Jones, 106 U. S. 466, 1 Sup. Ct. 423,

396 Miller y. New Orleans Fertilizer Co., 211 U. S.

27 L. Ed. 267... 496, 29 Sup. Ct. 176, 53 L. Ed. 300..

Morrison v. Gunning, 91 Wash: 693, 157 Pac. 1199 226

218 Morton v. Nebraska, 21 Wall. 660, 22 L Ed. 639 194 Miller v. Strahl, 239 U. 8. 426, 434, 36 Sup. Ct. Moses Taylor, The, 4 Wall, 411, 431, 18 L. Ed. 147, 60 L. Ed. 364.

325
397

503 Milliken v. Pratt, 125 Mass. 374, 377, 383, 28 Am. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Rep. 241...

148 Mfg. Co., 243 U. S. 502, 37 Sup. Ct 416, 61 L Mills v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 238 U. S. 473, 35 Ed. 871, L. R. A. 1917E, 1187..260, 285, 482, 481, 487 Sup. Ct. 888, 59 L. Ed. 1414.

186 Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U. S. 1, 22 Sup. Ct. 269, Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.

46 L. Ed. 405.

39 S. 211, 36 Sup. Ct. 595, 60 L. Ed. 961, L. R. Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, 662, 8 Sup. Ct. A. 1917A, 86, Ann. Cas. 1916E, 505....

416
273, 31 L Ed. 205.

99 Minneapolis & St. L. R. R. v. Minnesota, 186 U.

Muguruza v. International Banking Corp., 10 S. 257, 22 Sup. Ct. 900, 46 L. Ed. 1151. 51 Phil. Rep. 346..

514 Minneapolis St. L. R. Co. v. Winters, 242 U. S.

Muhlenburg County v. Morehead, 46 8. W. 484, 20 353, 37 Sup. Ct. 170, 61 L. Ed. 358. 425 Ky. Law Rep. 376.

46 Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 U. S. 375, 399-401,

Mullan v. U. S., 118 U. S. 271, 6 Sup. Ct. 1041, 30 22 Sup. Ct. 650, 46 L. Ed. 954.. 137 L. Ed. 170.

194 Minnesota V. Immigration Land Co., 46 Land Mullen, in re (D. C.) 101 Fed. 413.

218 Dec. 14...

510 Mullen v. Peck, 49 Ohio St. 447, 31 N, E. 1077 301 Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co., Wall. 609, 632, Mullen v. U. S., 46 C. C. A. 22, 106 Fed. 892; 224 633, 17 L. Ed. 886..

.48, 313 U. S. 448, 32 Sup. Ct. 494, 56 L Ed. 834.. Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U. S. 352, 419-420, 461,

210, 286, 288 33 Sup. Ct. 729, 57 L. Ed. 1511, 48 L R. A. (N. Mulry V. Norton, 100 N. Y. 424, 3 N. E. 581, S.) 1151, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 18.. ...393, 551, 553 53 Am. Rep. 206...

305 Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining Co., 102 U. Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, S. 167, 174, 26 L. Ed. 126... . 194, 195, 196 265 Mo. 252, 177 S. W. 856.

225 Mining Co. v. Tarbet, 98 U. S. 463, 467, 25 L, Ed. Munsey v. Clough, 196 U. $. 364, 373, 374, 25 253 675 Sup. Ct. 282, 49 L. Ed. 515..

424 Minot y. Mastin, 95 Fed. 734, 739, 37 C. C. A. 234 267 Murphy v. California, 225 U. S. 623, 32 Sup. Ct. Mississippi R. Commission v. Illinois Cent. R. 697, 56 L. Ed. 1229, 41 L. R. A. (N, S.) 153. 99

Co., 203 U. S. 335, 344, 345, 27 Sup. Ct. 90, 51 Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hill, 193 U. S. 551, 554, L. Ed. 209. 236 24 Sup. Ct. 538, 48 L. Ed. 788..

342 Missouri v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 241 U. S. Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 235,

533, 543, 36 Sup. Ćt. 715, 60 L. Ed. 1148. 462 32 Sup. Ct. 74, 56 L. Ed. 175, Ann. Cas. 1913B, Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U. S. 208, 21 Sup. Ct. 331,

521

64 45 L. Ed. 497; 200 U. S. 496, 26 Sup. Ct. 268, Myers V. Anderson, 238 U. S. 368, 380, 35 Sup. 50 L Ed. 572; 202 U. S. 598, 26 Sup. Ct. 713, 50

126 L. Ed. 1160.. 402 Myers v. Picquet, 61 Ga. 260..

177 Missouri v. Iowa, 7 How. 659, 12 L. Ed. 861; 10

How. 1, 13 L. Ed. 303; 160 U. S. 688, 16 Sup. Ct. 433, 40 L. Ed. 583; 165 U. S. 118, 17 Sup. Ct.

Nasb v. U. S., 229 U. S. 373, 377, 33 Sup. Ct. 780, 57 L. Ed. 1232. ....

325 290, 41 L Ed. 655.

402 National Bank v. Insurance Co., 104 U. S. 54, Missouri v. Kansas, 213 U. S. 78, 29 Sup. Ct. 417, 53 L. Ed. 706.

68, 26 L. Ed. 693...

402 National Bank v. Mechanics' Bank, 94 U. S. 437, Missouri v. Kentucky, 11 Wall. 395, 20 L. Ed. 116

91 439, 24 L. Ed. 176.. 402

National Exch. Bank V. Wiley, 195 U. S. 257, 25 Sup. Ct. 70, 49 L Ed. 184..

.. 455, 457

« AnteriorContinuar »