Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES

CITED AND AN INDEX.

BY JOHN W. KERN,

OFFICIAL REPORTER.

VOL. 107,

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE MAY TERM, 1886, NOT

PUBLISHED IN VOL, 106.

INDIANAPOLIS:
THE BOWEN-MERRILL CO., LAW PUBLISHERS.

1886.

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1886,

BY JOHN W. KERN,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

ree. Faber

[ocr errors]

PRINTED AND BOUND BY CARLON & HOLLEN BECK,

INDIANAPOLIS.

ELECTROTYPED BY INDIANAPOLIS ELECTROTYPE

FOUNDRY.

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Adams, Town of Rushville v.....475 | Buser v. Shepard .....................417 Ætna Life Ins. Co., McLead v...

... 394 Buskirk, Western Union Tel.Co.v.549 Aper, DeHart v........

460 Aikinson y. Dailey... ..117 Carrothers v. Carrothers....

530 Cassady, Harris V..........

158 Ball, Secnrity Company V......... ..165 Castor v. Jones ....

.283 Beasley, Wood v.

37 Center Tp., Board of Comm’rs of Belt Railroad and. Stock Yard Marion Co. v..

..584 Co. v. Mann 89 Chawlers, Cook « .........

67 Bever v. North ..544 Chapman v. Moore...

..223 Billings v. State......

54 City of Fort Wayne v. Coombs... 75 Bird v. State... 154 City of Greenfield, Over V.........

....231 Bixel v. Bixel....

..534 | City of Lafayette v. Wortman ... 404 Black v. Thomson......

162 City of Madison, Powell y........ 106 Bloomfield R. R. Co. v. Van City of Rushville, Grafsty V.......

...502 Slike... ..480 Cleveland v. Obenchain............

.591 Bloomington School Tp. of Mon Cobb, Schneck y..........

.439 roe Co. v. Nat'l School Furn Conwell v. Tate.....

..171 ishing Co........ 43 Cook v. Chambers.....

67 Blount v. Rick

238 Cook, Rochester, Rensselaer and Board of Comm’rs of Grant Co., St. Louis R. W. Co. v............ 599 Stout v...

343 Coombs, City of Fort Wayne v .. 75 Board of Comm’rs of Marion Co. Coshy, Ohio and Mississippi R. v. Center Tp..........

...584
W. Co. V .......

32 Board of Comm’rs of Marion Co., Cunningham, Bundy V...............

...360 Hilgenberg v.

..494 Board of Comm’rs of Wells Co., Daggett v. Bonewitz .... ..276 Ellingham v .....600 Dailey, Atkinson v

...117 Board of Comm’rs of Wells Co., Daugherty v. Deardorf.... ...527 Johnson v

15 Deardorf, Daugherty v.. 527 Bonewitz, Daggett v 276 Dellart v. A per........

.460 Bradford School Town of Marion.

280 Edwards, Rochester, Rensselaer Brown, Terre Hante and Indian and St. Louis R. W. Co. y......599

apolis R. R. Co. V.... .336 Ellingham v. Board of Comn'rs Bryan, Louisville, New Albany of Wells Co........

...600 and Chicago R. W. Co. v 51 Evansville and Terre Haute R, R. Bumb v. Gard .575) (o., State v..

..581 Bundy v. Cunningham... 360 Ewing, Jones V.....

.313 Burrow v. Terre Haute ard Logansport R. R. Co

.432 Falmouth and Lewisville T. P. Büscher v. Knapp..... ..340 Co. v. Shawhan........

47 Buscher v. Scully

.246 Favorite, Slauter y........ .291

(ii)

...............

Fawkner v. Scottish American Jones v. Ewing.....

.313 Mortgage Co......... .555 Jones, Castor v..

.283 Ferguson, Rochester, Rensselaer Joseph, Wilson V............

..490 and St. Louis R. W. Co. v ......599 Judd v. Small......

..398 First Nat'l Bank of Indianapolis June v. Payne.....

..307 v. Root.....

.224 First Nat'l Bank of Indianapolis, Kable, Wolfe y........

..565 Wasson V........ 206 Keeling v. State..........

.563 First Nat'l Bank of Kendallville, Kennedy v. State........

..144 Ringle v...

425 Kirkpatrick v. Pearce...... ..520 Fletcher, Watts V...... ..391 Knapp, Buscher V..

..340 Fort Wayne, City of, v. Coombs.. 75 Fosdyke v. Nixon...

..138 | Lafayette, City of, v. Wortman..404 Foster, Indiana, Bloomington Lake Erie and Western R. W. Co. and Western R. W. Co. v .......432 v. Griffin.....

..464 Fulkerson, Rochester, Rensselaer Langley v. Mayhew.....

198 and St. Louis R. W. Co. v ......599 Lemcke, Hutchinson ....... 121

Locke, Western Union Tel. Co. v.. 9 Gard, Bumb y..... ..575 Long v. Straus

94 Graffty v. City of Rushville......502 Louisville, New Albany and ChiGrauman, Natl Benefit Associa cago R. W. Co. v. Bryan..... 51 tion of Indianapolis V... ......

.288 Louisville, New Albany and ChiGray v. State.........

.177 cago R. W. Co. v. Thompson... 442 Greenfield, City of, Over v........231 Louisville, New. Albany and ChiGriffin, Lake Erie and Western cago R. W. Co. v. Worley ......320 R. W. Co. V........

..464 Louisville, New Albany and Chi

cago R. W. Co., Indiana Oolitic

Limestone Co. V............ Haas, McComas V......... 512

..........301 Hackney v. Welsh..

253

Louisville, New Albany and ChiHanes, l'horp v

..324

cago R. W. Co., Woolery v .....381 Hardy v. McKinney..

.364 Harland, Moore V..............

Madison, City of, Powell ........106

..474 Harris v. Cassady..

Mann, Belt Railroad and Stock ..158 Yard Co. V...

89 Hartley, McCormick v

.248

Marshall v. State, ex rel. Shryer..173 Hay, Owen School Tp., of Clark

198 Co., V.....

Mayhew, Langley V..........
.351
McComas v. Haas.

.512 Hays v. Peck.

.389

McCormick v. Hartley Hensley v. State ...587

.248

. McGonagle, Spencer v

..410 Hilgenberg v. Board of Comm’rs of Marion Co..........

494

McKee, Rochester, Rensselaer and
St. Louis R. W. Co. V... .......

.....598 Hopkins v. Hudson ....

..191 Hudson v. State........

.......364 McKinney, Hardy V...... ........372

McLead v. Ætna Life Ins. Co....394 Hudson, Hopkins v....... 191

.567 Hutchinson v. Lemcke...........

Mergentheim v. State.
121
Miller v. State.....

152

Miller, Redelsheimer V....... .485 Indiana, Bloomington and West

Miller, Rochester, Rensselaer and ern R. W. Co v. Foster........... 432

St. Louis R. W. Co. V............598 Indiana Oolitic Limestone Co. v.

Miller, State, ex rel. Board of Louisville, New Albany and Comm’rs of Allen Co., V......... 39 Chicago R. W. Co...

..301 Moffitt, Roche V........... 58 Moore v. Harland.

..474 Jeffries, Souders V .....................552 Moore, Chapman v

..223 Jenkins, Rochester, Rensselaer Mowrer v. State...

.539 and St. Louis R. W. Co. V......599 Mulreed v. State.....

62 Jewell, Rochester, Rensselaer and Murphy v. State.

.598 St. Louis R. W. Co. V.............332 Murphy v. State.......... ...600 Johnson v. Board of Comm’rs of Wells Co..........

15 National Benefit Association of Johnson, Zenor y ......................

69 Indianapolis v. Grauman.......288

V..........

« AnteriorContinuar »