Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

203 U. S.

20 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281. Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.

No. 109. THE JAMES MCCREERY REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE EQUITABLE NATIONAL BANK. In error to the City Court of the city of New York. Submitted November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; McCormick y. Market National Bank, 165 U. S. 538; California National Bank v. Kennedy, 167 U. S. 367. Mr. Eugene G. Kremer for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles A. Hess for defendant in error.

No. 110. DAVID LAMAR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. Albert G. SPALDING. In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals. of the State of New Jersey. Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Case below, 68 N. J. Eq. 686. Mr. Alan H. Strong and Mr. Harry Allen Mendelson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edmund Wilson for defendant in error.

No. 111. CARL S. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued for plaintiff in error and submitted for defendant in error November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill,

203 U. S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, decided October 22, and cases cited. Mr. Clayton B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. A. Hull for defendant

in error.

No. 60. GRANVILLE STUART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAMUEL T. HAUSER ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Argued November 15, 1906. Decided December 3, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Green, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53. Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

No. 114. ANNIE CAMP FIELD ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Argued for the plaintiffs in error and submitted for defendant in error November 16, 1906. Decided December 3, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, 194 U. S. 618; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Company, 169 U. S. 557. Case below, Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Field, 188 Missouri, 182. Mr. Richard H. Field for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Wm. C. Scarritt and Mr. E. L. Scarritt for defendant in error.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

203 U.S.

No. 131. ROBERT D. KINNEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JAMES T. MITCHELL. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error December 13, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Robert D. Kinney pro se. Mr. Marlin E. Olmsted and Mr. Samuel Dickson for respondent.

No., Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF FRANK D. ZELL, PETITIONER, Submitted December 13, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Per Curiam. Motion for leave to file petition for writs of prohibition or mandamus denied. Mr. Charles L. Frailey, Mr. Charles H. Burr, Mr. Reynolds D. Brown and Mr. Malcolm Lloyd, Jr., for petitioner

No. 124. PEARL H. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL G. IVERSON AS STATE AUDITOR, ETC. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Argued December 12, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Company, 148 U. S. 262; In re Hohorst, 150 U. S. 653; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Bowker v. United States, 186 U. S. 135, 138. Mr. H. H. Grace, Mr. John Brennan and Mr. T. D. O'Brien for appellant. Mr. Coryate S. Wilson and Mr. Edward T. Young for appeilee.

No. 239. HIRAM T. CHAPMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FLORENCE ELLIOTT CHAPMAN. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Motion to dismiss submitted De

203 U. S. Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

cember 10, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173. Mr. William E. Gantt and Mr. Herbert L. Baker for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. J. W. Woodrough and

Mr. W. F. Gurley for defendant in error.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from October 8 to December 24, 1906.

No. 413. THE ATLANTIC TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. EDGAR C. CHAPMAN, RECEIVER, ETC., ET AL. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. Mr. Edward B. Whitney and Mr. Stanley W. Dexter for petitioner. Mr. Edgar C. Chapman for respondents.

No. 433. HENRY ARNOLD RICHARDSON, AS TRUSTEE, ETC., PETITIONER, V. JOHN M. SHAW ET AL. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted. Mr. John Brooks Leavitt for petitioner. Mr. E. S. Theall for respondents.

No. 142. THE EAGLE ORE SAMPLING COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. DUNCAN CHISHÓLM, TRUSTEE. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. H. M. Teller for petitioner. Mr. Joel F. Vaile, Mr. C. A. Brandenburg and Mr. E. C. Brandenburg for respondent.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

203 U. S.

No. 298. M. P. REEVE, PETITIONER, v. NORTH CAROLINA LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY ET AL. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. H. H. Ingersoll for petitioner. Mr. R. E. L. Mountcastle for respondents.

No. 305. ARTHUR WEINREB ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. JOSEPH H. FINK. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. F. M. Czaki for petitioners. Mr. Adolph Bloch for respondent.

No. 322. CARMELO GRECO, PETITIONER, V. THE STEAMSHIP SARNIA, ETC. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Wilford H. Smith for petitioner. Mr. Percy S. Dudley for respondent.

No. 330. THE DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM W. RUTTER ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. William D. Guthrie and Mr. Henry D. Hotchkiss for petitioner. Mr. Augustus Van Wyck for respondents.

No. 337. DAVID MCKENZIE, PETITIONER, v. JAMES PEASE, SHERIFF, ETC. October 15, 1906. Petition for a writ of

« AnteriorContinuar »