203 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM OCTOBER 8 TO DECEMBER 24, 1906. No., Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF THE SENECA NATION ET AL., PETITIONERS. Submitted October 9, 1906. Decided October 15, 1906. Per Curiam. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied. Mr. Chester Howe for petitioners. Mr. W. H. Robeson, Mr. J. J. Hemphill, Mr. A. B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton for respondents. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel for the United States. No. 297. FRANK D. ZELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motions to dismiss or affirm, etc., submitted May 21, 1906. Decided October 15, 1906. Per Curiam. Order affirmed with costs. Mr. Charles L. Frailey, Mr. Reynolds D. Brown, Mr. Malcolm Lloyd, Jr., Mr. A. S. Worthington and Mr. Charles H. Burr for plaintiff in error. Mr. D. Lawrence Groner, Mr. Tazewell Taylor and Mr. Hampton L. Carson for defendants in error: No. 339. THE GRAHAM AND MORTON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CRAIG SHIPBUILDING COMPANY. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Submitted October 9, 1906. Decided October 15, 1906. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of People's Ferry Company v. Beers, 20 How. 393; Roach v. Chapman, 22 How. 129; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall. 532; The Robert W. Parsons, 191 U. S. 17, and cases cited. VOL. COIII-37 Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 203 U. S. Mr. Charles E. Kremer for appellant. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder, Mr. S. H. Holding and Mr. Frank S. Masten for appellee. No. 19. JOSEPH J. WATERS, ADMINISTRATOR OF ROBERT JACKSON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GEORGE E. EMMONS AND J. PAUL SMITH. In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. See 19 App. D. C. 250; 25 App. D. C. 146. Mr. Joseph J. Waters for plaintiff in error. Mr. William F. Mattingly for defendants in error. No. 26. J. A. AXTELL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CYRUS WEBBER. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued October 16, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Beaupre v. Noyes, 138 U. S. 397; National Life Insurance Company v. Scheffer, 131 U. S. App. C. C. III. Mr. Albert R. Allen, Mr. C. M. O'Neil and Mr. George E. Clarke for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas J. Knox and Mr. Andrew C. Dunn for defendant in error. No. 29. DANIEL SULLIVAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ST. LOUIS, BROWNSVILLE AND MEXICO RAILWAY COMPANY. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas. Argued October 16, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450; Knapp v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, 197 U. S. 541. Mr. Floyd McGown and Mr. L. G. Denman for plaintiff in error. 203 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Eto. Mr. Reagan Houston and Mr. A. W. Houston for defendant in error. No. 35. NORTH AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION AND TRADING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. W. B. GILL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Submitted for plaintiff in error October 18, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Leon v. Galceran, 11 Wall. 185; American Steamboat Company v. Chase, 16 Wall. 522; The Robert W. Parsons, 191 U. S. 17, 36. Mr. Frederick Bausman for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 38. W. J. LAFFOON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. J. F. KERNER ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. Submitted for plaintiff in error October 18, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, Sheriff, et al., post, and cases cited. Mr. Louis M. Swink for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 148. CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES MANLEY, SHERIFF OF SHOSHONE COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO, ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Motion to dismiss submitted October 15, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskirk, 3 Wall. 448; Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374; Haseltine v, Central Bank of Springfield, Mo. (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 203 U.S. 198 U. S. 173; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541, 544. Mr. Myron A. Folsom for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Forney for defendants in error. No. 360. W. W. ROSE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF KANSAS ON THE RELATION OF C. C. COLEMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 15, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447; Nonconnah Turnpike Company v. Tennessee, 131 U. S. App. Cl. VIII; Newport Light Company v. Newport, 151 U. S. 527; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for plaintiff in error. Mr. C. C. Coleman for defendant in error. No. 208. FERDINAND EIDMAN, COLLECTOR, ETC., PETITIONER, v. FREDERICK B. TILGHMAN ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Argued October 15, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs by a divided court and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for petitioner. Mr. Edward B. Whitney for respondents. No. 6. THOMAS F. WILSON (ON BEHALF OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA), APPELLANT, v. N. O. MURPHY ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per 203 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees. No. 7. THOMAS F. WILSON (ON BEHALF OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA), APPELLANT, v. GEORGE W. VICKERS ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees. No. 241. HAIGHT & FREESE COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. BEVERLY R. ROBINSON, RECEIVER, ETC. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Motion to dismiss submitted October 22, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U. S. 117, 122; Nelson v. United States, 201 U. S. 92; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Beardsley v. Railway Company, 158 U. S. 123. Mr. Albert I. Sire for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Roger Foster for defendant in error. No. 62. FREDERICK H. VOGT, APPELLANT, v. MATILDA S. VOGT, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PAULINE VOGT. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Argued for appellant October 25 and 26, 1906. The court declined to hear further argument. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, ante, p. 579, and cases cited. Mr. John |