Abortion: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session [-Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session] ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 3
... fact take life , including the life of the unborn . This is likewise reflected by some 70 percent of the people of the State of North Dakota , and certainly the substantial majority of the legislators representing the people of New York ...
... fact take life , including the life of the unborn . This is likewise reflected by some 70 percent of the people of the State of North Dakota , and certainly the substantial majority of the legislators representing the people of New York ...
Página 4
... facts that are known to us today . Most of these facts have been out- lined to your committee and to your personally ... fact know when life be- gins and in addition as to whether or not we have the means of pro- tecting all life , even ...
... facts that are known to us today . Most of these facts have been out- lined to your committee and to your personally ... fact know when life be- gins and in addition as to whether or not we have the means of pro- tecting all life , even ...
Página 5
... facts as presented by science today that we are dealing with a life . It should also be clear to this committee that the ... fact has brought us to the stage where the conscience of the American public , after a brief ex- posure to the ...
... facts as presented by science today that we are dealing with a life . It should also be clear to this committee that the ... fact has brought us to the stage where the conscience of the American public , after a brief ex- posure to the ...
Página 6
... fact that it is not evil . It will never be morally justifiable . We cannot for a moment lose sight of the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court in Roe v . Wade stated that its judgment was consistent with an attempt to " solve the profound ...
... fact that it is not evil . It will never be morally justifiable . We cannot for a moment lose sight of the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court in Roe v . Wade stated that its judgment was consistent with an attempt to " solve the profound ...
Página 8
... fact of what abortion does allow it to be pro- moted as a welcome escape from a probles without considering the threat of harm in the promise of the relief . The acting of killing an unborn child involves complex medical , moral , and ...
... fact of what abortion does allow it to be pro- moted as a welcome escape from a probles without considering the threat of harm in the promise of the relief . The acting of killing an unborn child involves complex medical , moral , and ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abor abortifacient abortion decision abortion laws agencies American anti-life basic Bill BIRCH BAYH birth control Catholic Center clause clinics Committee conception constitutional amendment constitutionally contraception deny doctor due process ENGEL equal protection euthanasia fact family planning Federal feminist fertility fetus Fourteenth Amendment fundamental funds governmental Griswold groups HARVARD LAW REVIEW hospital Human Life Amendment individual infra interest involved issue judicial Justice LAW REVIEW legal abortion legislation legislatures liberty LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Lochner marriage ment mental moral mother National Noonan parents patient person physician Planned Parenthood population control pregnancy pro-life problem Professor programs prohibition prostaglandins question reason religious role Senator BAYH sexual social society statute sterilization supra note Supreme Court decision tion trimester U.S. Supreme Court Unborn Baby unborn child United unwanted USCL Wade woman women
Pasajes populares
Página 360 - If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child.
Página 260 - This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.
Página 214 - I think that the word liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment is perverted when it is held to prevent the natural outcome of a dominant opinion, unless it can be said that a rational and fair man necessarily would admit that the statute proposed would infringe fundamental principles as they have been understood by the traditions of our people and our law.
Página 265 - We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.
Página 278 - The doctrine that prevailed in Lochner, Coppage, Adkins, Burns, and like cases - that due process authorizes courts to hold laws unconstitutional when they believe the legislature has acted unwisely - has long since been discarded. We have returned to the original constitutional proposition that courts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.
Página 268 - The principal thrust of appellant's attack on the Texas statutes is that they improperly invade a right, said to be possessed by the pregnant woman, to choose to terminate her pregnancy. Appellant would discover this right in the concept of personal "liberty...
Página 265 - Perfection of the interests involved, again, has generally been contingent upon live birth. In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.
Página 298 - If the Texas statute were to prohibit an abortion even where the mother's life is in jeopardy, I have little doubt that such a statute would lack a rational relation to a valid state objective under the test stated in Williamson, supra.
Página 272 - Maternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the woman a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by :hild care.
Página 278 - I think the proper course is to recognize that a state legislature can do whatever it sees fit to do unless it is restrained by some express prohibition in the Constitution of the United States or of the State, and that Courts should be careful not to extend such prohibitions beyond their obvious meaning by reading into them conceptions of public policy that the particular Court may happen to entertain.