 Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, 305 US 197, 229. Accordingly, it "must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established. ... it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict...  Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports - Página 39por United States. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals - 1953Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | United States. Customs Court - 1975 - 376 páginas
...such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 US 292. "Under this test... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor - 1939 - 852 páginas
...of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, supra (59 S. Ct. (206) 217 (83 L. Ed. — )), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the Jury." The pronouncement of the test to be applied by a reviewing court to ascertain whether a finding by... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor - 1940 - 1662 páginas
...of Hew York v. National Labor Relations Board, supra (59 S. Ct. (206) 217 (83 L. Ed. — ) ), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the Jury." The pronouncement of the test to be applied by a reviewing court to ascertain •whether a finding... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1943 - 1002 páginas
...support a conclusion' (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, p. 229), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." While the Court says "substantial evidence is something more than a scintilla and must do more than... | |
 | United States. Federal Trade Commission - 1944 - 826 páginas
...a conclusion' (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, page 229), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...to be drawn 'from it is one of fact for the jury." [Citing cases.] We have then to consider whether the Commission's findings in the instant case, so... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1946 - 732 páginas
...court, If warranted by the evidence, even though it permits of conflicting inferences." 155 F. 2d 17 direct a verdict when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury.' " 8 Within the meaning of the foregoing requirements, we are of the opinion the evidence afforded substantial... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Employment Security - 1963 - 974 páginas
...(Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 US 197, 59 S.Ct. 206, 217, 83 L.Ed. 126), "enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." (National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Enameling & Stamping Co., Inc., 306 US 292, 59 S.Ct. 501,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare - 1966 - 334 páginas
...Accordingly, it "must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established. ... it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." Labor Board \. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 US 292, 300. The very smoothness of the "substantial... | |
| |
