Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme CourtWhen Closed Chambers was first published, it was met with a firestorm of controversy—as well as a shower of praise—for being the first book to break the code of silence about the inner workings of this country's most powerful court. In this eloquent, trailblazing account, with a new chapter covering Bush v. Gore, Guantanamo, and other recent controversial court decisions, Edward Lazarus, who served as a clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun, presents a searing indictment of a court at war with itself and often in neglect of its constitutional duties. Combining memoir, history, and legal analysis, Lazarus reveals in astonishing detail the realities of what takes place behind the closed doors of the U.S. Supreme Court—an institution that through its rulings holds the power to affect the life of every American. |
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
CLOSED CHAMBERS: The First Eyewitness Account of the Epic Struggles Inside the Supreme Court
Crítica de los usuarios - KirkusJustice Oliver Wendell Holmes's tart description of Supreme Court deliberations—"nine scorpions in a bottle"—has seldom seemed more apt than in this scathing tell-all screed about the Rehnquist ... Leer comentario completo
LibraryThing Review
Crítica de los usuarios - aevaughn - LibraryThingThis books really got me to thinking. It does give you a good feeling for what went on during the Burger and Rehnquist courts. It mostly consists of a series of chapters on different topics and how ... Leer comentario completo
Contenido
Authors Note | 3 |
A Clerks Eye View | 17 |
The Grand Canyon | 47 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 17 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Edward Lazarus Vista de fragmentos - 1999 |
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Edward Lazarus Sin vista previa disponible - 1999 |
Términos y frases comunes
abortion action affirmative Amendment appeals approach argued argument authority Blackmun Bork Brennan brief called capital cert challenge Chambers Chief Circuit civil claims clerks close conference conservatives considered constitutional conviction criminal death penalty decided decision defendant discrimination dissent draft due process equal especially evidence execution fact federal four grant ground habeas hand hearing important interest issue joined judges judicial jury Justice Kennedy Kennedy's lawyers least less liberal liberty majority Marshall matter McCleskey never O'Connor opinion original overruling petition political potential Powell practice precedents principle protection punishment question race racial reason Rehnquist result rule Scalia seemed sentence side simply specifically standard statute stay Stevens suggested Supreme Court term Thomas thought tion trial turn vote Warren Webster White writing York