The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics?Oxford University Press, 1996 M01 25 - 288 páginas In the modern period of American constitutional law--the period since the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed racially segregated public schooling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954)--there has been a persistent and vigorous debate in the United States about whether the Court has merely been enforcing the Constitution or whether, instead, in the guise of enforcing the Constitution, the Court has really been usurping the legislative prerogative of making political choices about controversial issues. In this book, Professor Perry carefully disentangles and then thoughtfully addresses the various fundamental issues at the heart of the controversy: What is the argument for "judicial review"? What approach to constitutional interpretation should inform the practice of judicial review? How large or small a role should the Court play in bringing the interpreted Constitution to bear in resolving constitutional conflicts? To what extent are the Court's most controversial modern decisions--for example, decisions about racial segregation, discrimination based on sex, abortion, and homosexuality--sound; to what extent are they problematic? The Constitution in the Courts is a major contribution to one of the most fundamental controversies in modern American politics and law. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 88
Página 3
... persons ( whether all persons or just citizens1 ) against govern- ment : rights to do , or not to do , something , which we sometimes call " lib- erties " or " privileges " ; rights to have government do something for us , which we ...
... persons ( whether all persons or just citizens1 ) against govern- ment : rights to do , or not to do , something , which we sometimes call " lib- erties " or " privileges " ; rights to have government do something for us , which we ...
Página 6
... person who will interpret the Constitution , and in my view not legislate from the Federal bench . . . . What I'm certain of is that he will interpret the Constitution , not legislate from the Federal bench . " 20 In an op - ed piece ...
... person who will interpret the Constitution , and in my view not legislate from the Federal bench . . . . What I'm certain of is that he will interpret the Constitution , not legislate from the Federal bench . " 20 In an op - ed piece ...
Página 8
... Persons who agree about ( 1 ) what the relevant facts are , ( 2 ) what the other rele- vant legal norms are , and ( 3 ) what the implications of those other norms for the case are , can nonetheless disagree — reasonably disagree ...
... Persons who agree about ( 1 ) what the relevant facts are , ( 2 ) what the other rele- vant legal norms are , and ( 3 ) what the implications of those other norms for the case are , can nonetheless disagree — reasonably disagree ...
Página 15
... person in her capacity as an official or employee of the government , or it may be something in between . I am not concerned here or elsewhere in this book with the judi- cial practice of inquiring if a governmental act ( or failure to ...
... person in her capacity as an official or employee of the government , or it may be something in between . I am not concerned here or elsewhere in this book with the judi- cial practice of inquiring if a governmental act ( or failure to ...
Página 33
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Contenido
3 | |
15 | |
3 The Argument for the Originalist Approach to Judicial Review | 28 |
The Indeterminacy of History | 54 |
The Indeterminacy of Morality | 70 |
6 Skepticism about Minimalismand about Nonminimalism Too | 83 |
7 The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment | 116 |
Equal Protection | 136 |
Substantive Due Process | 161 |
Law and Politics | 192 |
Notes | 205 |
Index | 269 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abortion according affirmative action American antidiscrimination directive approach to constitutional argument basis Bill of Rights Bork Bork's Chicago L citizens clause was meant conception of proper Congress consti constitutional adjudication constitutional interpretation constitutional provision constitutional text constitutionality context decision directive represented discrimination discriminatory due process clause enacted enforce equal protection clause federal Fourteenth Amendment free exercise clause human immunities clause indeterminate constitutional directives issue judgment judicial minimalism judicial review Justice Justice Brennan legislation liberty McAffee ment minimalist approach moral national government Ninth Amendment nonminimalist normative minimalism ordinary politics original meaning originalist approach originalist judge originally understood particular persons political community political-moral Posner practice of judicial premises principle privileges and immunities privileges or immunities proper judicial role protected privileges question racial ratifiers reasonableness directive relevant Robert Bork rule Scalia sense statute substantive due process Supreme Court Thayer Thayerian tion tional tive tutional violate worse treatment
Pasajes populares
Página 118 - States to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.
Página 141 - Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and, generally, to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.
Página 118 - That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States...
Página 141 - The liberty mentioned in that amendment means not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties; to be free to use them in all lawful ways; to live and work where he will; to earn his livelihood by any lawful calling; to pursue any livelihood or avocation, and for that purpose to enter into all contracts which may be proper, necessary...
Página 145 - We boast of the freedom enjoyed by our people above all other peoples. But it is difficult to reconcile that boast with a state of the law which, practically, puts the brand of servitude and degradation upon a large class of our fellow citizens, — our equals before the law. The thin disguise of "equal" accommodations for passengers in railroad coaches will not mislead any one, nor atone for the wrong this day done.
Página 16 - Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the will of the legislature declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people declared in the constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter, rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental.
Página 208 - The fundamental human rights by this Constitution guaranteed to the people of Japan are fruits of the age-old struggle of man to be free; they have survived the many exacting tests for durability and are conferred upon this and future generations in trust, to be held for all time inviolate.
Página 250 - We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.
Referencias a este libro
The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis Michael J. Gerhardt Vista previa limitada - 2000 |
To Secure These Rights: The Declaration of Independence and Constitutional ... Scott Douglas Gerber Sin vista previa disponible - 1996 |