Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[graphic][merged small][graphic][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

THE deliberate and successfully executed plot of the conspirators to defeat Mr. Douglas for President in 1860 gave ample proof of their consolidated power, and indicated unmistakably their ultimate purpose. Their last and crowning political move was the one in which they had convened in Washington, what they called a "Peace Congress."

When I tell you that ex-President John Tyler, the mere creature of the Texas annexation conspirators of 1845, was selected for its president, you can without much effort get at the intellectual and political status of nine out of ten of the men who fussed and fumed and amazed the

*The above address, the first half of which was given in the October issue, was delivered by Hon. J. M. Ashley, at Memorial Hall, Toledo, Ohio, on June 2, 1890. Gov. Ashley is an intelligent observer of events, and his story of what he personally saw, in the great drama of the rebellion, will be read with deep interest,

II.

country by the stupidity and folly of their so-called "peace propositions."

When the future historian comes to summarize the facts of which I have spoken, he will write: "Politically, from 1843 to 1861, this was the rottenest so-called civilized government on earth; morally, it was a lazarhouse full of dead men's bones; financially, it was bankrupt in 1861, and the conspirators borrowing money at 12 per cent." And he will add, to the glory of our volunteer army of which you formed a part, that "the madness of secession and the baseness of slave conspiracies at home and slave piracy under our flag on the high seas was then stamped out and made impossible forever."

In the midst of this moral and political abasement and national degradation of which I have spoken, Abraham Lincoln was called by his countrymen to the office of President.

Congress convened in extra session

on his proclamation. All the laws necessary for the organization of an army were enacted. Full power was given him in his discretion to order and direct the army; and for four years, which I need not undertake to summarize to-night, he so administered the government as at every step to command the profound admiration, not only of the great men of this country, but of the great men of the world.

I did not want Mr. Lincoln to invite either Mr. Seward or Mr. Chase to seats in his cabinet. I was anxious to have them both in the Senate, as I looked on them as great Senators. And then, I did not feel certain that Mr. Chase (who up to that time had given no evidence of financial ability) would make a successful Secretary of the Treasury; while as a Senator I was certain that he would stand with the foremost, as he had done during his first term in that body. The legislature of Ohio had just elected him for six years, and in view of the approaching storm I felt confident he would make no personal or party mistake in the Senate, while he might fail as Secretary of the Treasury. It was generally rumored, early in January, that Mr. Seward was to be Secretary of State, and when I met Mr. Lincoln soon after he reached Washington, and this announcement was confirmed by him, I simply said: "Mr. President, I cannot tell you how much I regret it." He expressed some surprise, and wanted to know

my objections. I answered that it was too late now to talk about it, but that my objections were the same as those I had against Mr. Seward's nomination at Chicago, and that the unsatisfactory speech which he had just made in the Senate was an additional objection.

I suggested but one name for his cabinet, and that was Edwin M. Stanton, of Ohio, for Secretary of War (then a member of Mr. Buchanan's cabinet). I had known Mr. Stanton quite intimately from my boyhood, and recognized his great ability and tireless energy. In addition to this, I had repeatedly called at Mr. Stanton's house to confer with him after he became a member of Mr. Buchanan's cabinet, and found him to be heart and soul against the conspirators, that he fully understood their movements, and was ready and anxious to defeat their plots.

One night, after a protracted interview, he walked to the door with me, and as he bade me good-night, grasped my hand and said: “Stand firm; you men have committed no blunder yet." When I repeated these words to Mr. Lincoln, and related in substance other interviews of a like character, and told him something of Mr. Stanton's early life in Ohio, I saw that I made an impression on Mr. Lincoln quite favorable to him.

But when the cabinet was announced I was about as disappointed as any man in Washington, because there was but one man in it for whom

I would have voted, as a first choice, and for him only because he was from a border slave State, and that man was Mr. Bates, of Missouri, for Attorney-General.

Of course, I was delighted when later on Mr. Lincoln made Mr. Stanton Secretary of War.

All the objections I then had to Mr. Seward as Secretary of State, and many more, soon became patent to the ordinary observer.

I had never regarded Mr. Seward as a practical man, nor a safe party leader, except for a party in the minority. His speech of January 12th, 1861, in the Senate, after it was known he had been selected by Mr. Lincoln for Secretary of State, and his official blunders after he became Secretary, tell the story of his utter inability to safely and successfully lead a great party charged with the administration of a government such as ours during the dark days from 1861 to 1865.

He who now reads that speech of Mr. Seward, in the light of history, will fully comprehend that his leadership was like the blind leading the blind.

That speech was prepared by Mr. Seward with more than his usual care, as it should have been, before its delivery in the Senate by the man soon to become Prime Minister.

After it had been written and put in type, it was reviewed, and recast, and conned over and over again, not only by Mr. Seward, but by more.

than one friend of ability and position, and every word or line that made it mean anything was stricken out, and every word or suggestion was deliberately added that could possibly make it more foggy or

nebulous.

The day of its delivery in the Senate was a solemn and memorable one, not only in Washington, but throughout the country. The great heart of the nation was still and heavy with apprehension. Every loyal citizen expected and longed to have pointed out to him the way to preserve the national unity and national life without dishonor. Never in our history has there been such an occasion for a statesman, and never before was there such a failure.

Mr. Stevens, of Pennsylvania, then an old man (and by far the ablest man with whom I served in Congress), walked over with me from the House to the Senate Chamber. We both had seats in the aisle, a little in front of Mr. Seward's desk, and could hear him distinctly. I need not say that we listened, as did every one in that vast audience and in the entire nation, for one word or thought that would stir our hearts or give us hope. But no such word or suggestion came in that speech from the man who was so soon to be charged with the most delicate and responsible office in Mr. Lincoln's cabinet.

I have more than once seen both the Senate and House in mourning, but never did I see so sad an audi

ence quit the Senate Chamber as on that day.

While walking back with Stevens towards the House I said: "Mr.

Stevens, what do you say to all that?" His answer was short, sharp and characteristic. He said: "I have listened to every word, and by the living God, I have heard nothing." After going with Mr. Stevens to his committee room, I immediately returned to the Senate, to get the opinions of the Senators with whom I was intimate. Taking Mr. Wade by the hand, I said: "Well, Mr. Senator, what have you to say?" And he answered: “If we follow such leadership, we will be in the wilderness longer than the children of Israel under Moses." Mr. Sumner said: "I knew what was coming, but confess that I am sad." Zac. Chandler did not wait for my question, but as I approached him. raised his hands and exclaimed: "Great God! how are the mighty fallen!"

And this was the judgment of a majority of our friends, in both the Senate and House, with whom at that time I exchanged opinions about the speech. It was reluctantly admitted that it meant a backdown to the conspirators.

And this, alas! was the best, and all, the new prime minister had to offer us. Instead of pointing out the path of duty and safety as a statesman should have done, he led us into the wilderness, enveloped in a cloud

of words and metaphors, and there left us.

I was anxious from the day of the delivery of that speech until the Republican Senators, with but one dissenting vote, requested Mr. Lincoln to dismiss Mr. Seward from his cabinet. And though the President did. not comply with that request of the Republican Senators, as I then thought and now think he should have done, I felt confident that we should from that time on have less of Mr. Seward's amazing assumption, that (when in his hand) "the pen. was mightier than the sword." Mr. Lincoln's position and leadership was unquestioned from this date.

SEWARD.

Immediately after entering upon his duties as Secretary of State, Mr. Seward assumed to direct all departments of the government, substantially as if he were a British prime minister and Mr. Lincoln but the nominal executive.

Without consulting either the President, the Secretary of War, or the Secretary of the Navy, Mr. Seward undertook, secretly and on his own responsibility, to direct the movements of military and naval officers as if he were, in fact, President. caused the rebel authorities in Charleston to be notified by telegraph that the "administration had given a confidential order to reinforce Fort Sumter," to which Mr. Seward

He

« AnteriorContinuar »