Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

century.

Yet the list can hardly be read without creating feelings of surprise and regret. From 1815 to 1861 the Crown created some scores of peerages, yet the greatest names will The greatest rarely be found amongst the peers who were thus men of the created by the Crown. It bestowed ribands, garters, baronetcies, knighthoods, and inferior honours by hundreds, yet many of the greatest men lived and died without such distinction. Ministers had places and pensions for a selected few, yet the greatest names will not be found among the officeholders and the pensioners. The people have contributed their donations to erect statues and monuments to some of their heroes, yet the greatest men have in rare instances had their memory thus preserved to us in marble or brass.

For the true founders of modern England are its inventors and engineers; and the great inventors and engineers of England have been men of lowly birth who have neither coveted nor received titles and rewards. By their works alone they are known, by their works alone will they be remembered. Yet, if true greatness may be measured by a man's achievements, what man is there in the eighteenth century who stands so high as James Watt? What man in the nineteenth century can be named in the same category with George Stephenson? What other two men have exerted so great and salutary an influence on the fortunes and prosperity of modern England?

Foremost, then, among the worthies of modern England are her inventors and her engineers; and foremost among these are Watt and Stephenson. Next to these should probably be mentioned the men who have influenced thought and legislation by their writings. The great authors of an age, however, rarely or never influence its contemporary thought. The authors who exerted the chief influence on English history from 1815 to 1861 were born and worked in the eighteenth century; and foremost among them, and therefore foremost in the second category among the nation's worthies, were Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham.

There is, however, a third company of great men to whom modern England is largely indebted, composed of those

persons who have worked for the good of their fellow-men. Howard, Wilberforce, Buxton, Romilly, Matthew, Owen, Ashley, are perhaps the leading persons in the small company of worthies which is included in the third category of the chief benefactors of modern England.

· Beside these, again, stand the little company of great statesmen who have promoted the nation's progress by their measures or increased its happiness by their policy. Four men who lived in the period of which I am treating, Grey, Peel, Cobden, and Russell, stand out prominent among these. among the four, the name of greatest mark is that of Peel.

But,

I have thus endeavoured, in a few sentences, to summarise the chief lessons to be deduced from the history of modern England, and to name the chief actors who have borne their part in the drama. The narrative, rightly understood, should inspire a consolation and a hope. Men there are who abandon themselves to doubt and despair from a conscious inability either to understand or relieve the vast mass of misery around them. Such men may, to some extent, be consoled by the reflection that, if thousands of their fellowcreatures are annually born in shame and reared in vice, the condition of the poor, miserable though it still be, is infinitely better than it was in 1842. Such men may perhaps be encouraged to hope that moral welfare, like material prosperity, is subject to the laws of evolution, which are as certain as they are slow in their working. Thus, strengthened by contemplating the improvement of the past, they may brace themselves for the struggle which still lies before them in the future; and carrying on the work of Watt and Stephenson, of Smith and Bentham, of Howard and Ashley, of Peel and Russell, they may labour, like these and other great men, for the furtherance of the common weal.

INDEX.

INDEX.

AARGAU, the Diet at, decrees the expulof the Jesuits, v. 377.

Abbot, Charles. See Colchester. Abbott, Mr. Justice, afterwards Lord Tenderden, presides at first trial of Hone, i. 379; made Chief-Justice, 381. Abd-Allah Bey, Pacha of Acre, iv. 280; attacked by Mehemet Ali, 280. Abd-el-Kader, a fugitive in Morocco, v. 351.

Abdoolla Khan insulted by Burnes, vi. 183; his death, 185.

Abdul Medjid, accession of, v. 321. Abercromby, Rt. Hon. James (afterwards

Lord Dunfermline), his attack upon the Orange Societies, ii. 295; his motion on the representation of Edinburgh, 341; elected for Edinburgh, iii. 358; thought of for Speakership in 1833, 365 n.; his opinion of Stanley's speech on the Coercion Bill, 380 n.; offered Chief Secretaryship for Ireland, 432 n.; Master of the Mint, 461; elected for Edinburgh, 461 m.; spoken of for leadership, 480; made Speaker, iv. 10; his conduct in the Chair, 176, 177, 213; resigns, 177; Speakership of, 351.

Aberdeen, the condition of the borough, ii.

333

Aberdeen, Earl of, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, ii. 375; made Foreign Minister, 390; desires to tear up the Treaty of London, iii. 135; objects to an excessive tribute for Greece, 136; objects to interfere in favour of Greeks sold into slavery, 137; sends Gordon as Ambassador to the Porte, 142; suggests the division of Greece into two States, 145; Colonial Minister, iv. 4; his Canadian policy, 119; his views on Belgium, 251; attacks the Ancona expedition, 266; offers to recognise Miguel, 286; accepts the Foreign Office, v. 1; supports Peel in 1845, 130; pacific policy of, under Peel, 197; his Non-Intrusion Bill, 314; his administration of the Foreign Office under Peel, 324; his conciliatory tone on the differences with America, 335; asserts his resolve to defend British rights in Oregon, 341; offers a compromise, which is accepted,

342; tolerates the French protectorate of the Society Islands, 346; disavows Pritchard's proceedings at Tahiti, 347; answers Guizot's question of the strength of the "saints" in the House of Commons, 348; his pacific counsels on the French difference with Morocco, 353; his perfect accord with Guizot, 353; his censure of Aston, 355; denies the right of France to regulate the marriage of Queen Isabella, 356; recommends a choice from the descendants of Philip V., 357; censures Bulwer and discloses Christina's intrigue, 362; his view of the intervention in Cracow, 368; overtures to, in the crisis of 1851, 429; suggests parliamentary resolutions in lieu of the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill, 430; his foreign policy compared with Palmerston's, 433; forms a coalition ministry, 472; conversations of the Czar Nicholas with, vi. 9; endeavours of his govern. ment to arrange the dispute between Russia and France, 11; effects of his policy of peace on Nicholas, 16; refuses to retire in favour of Russell, 23; decision of his government after the affair at Sinope, 26; resigns, 51; his confidence in Nicholas, 57; his foreign policy,

[blocks in formation]

Abinger, Lord, his sentence on Bean, v. 26 n.

Absenteeism in Ireland, v. 89.

Academical Society suppressed, i. 358. Achmet Pacha, carries Turkish fleet into Alexandria, iv. 321.

Ackermann, treaty of, iii. 114, 117; denounced by the Porte, 133.

Acland, Sir Thomas, one of the House of Commons deputation to the queen, ii. 44; supports the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, 1478, 379; supports the first Reform Bill, iii. 210; supports Gascoigne's amendment, 211; his motion on Irish Tithe Bill of 1838, iv. 154. A'Court, Sir W. (afterwards Lord Heytesbury), his conduct at Naples, iii. 29; appointed minister at Madrid, 45.

« AnteriorContinuar »