Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

POSSE COMITATUS ACT

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

CONTENTS

གས

Farris, Hon. Anthony J. P., judge, Civil Courts Building, Houston, Tex., letter
dated September 25, 1981, to Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr.

Flower, Ruth, legislative secretary, Friends Committee on National Legisla-
tion, letter dated June 3, 1981, to Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr.....

Giuliana, Rudolph W., Associate General Counsel, Department of Justice,

letters to:

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Hughes, Hon. William J., chairman, Subcommittee on Crime, letter dated
March 18, 1981, to Hon. Melvin Price......

123

Juliana, James N., Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, letter
dated April 5, 1982, to Hon. William J. Hughes

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

90

Rodino, Hon. Peter W., Jr., chairman, House Committee on the Judiciary,
letters to-Continued

Adm. John S. Hayes, dated May 21, 1981.
Schacter, Leon J., Deputy Associate General Counsel, Office of the General
Counsel, letter dated March 19, 1981, to Subcommittee on Crime.......
Shattuck, John, director, American Civil Liberties Union, letters to:

Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr., July 6, 1981..

Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr., June 8, 1981.

Sherman, Edward F., professor of law, University of Texas Law School, letter
dated June 25, 1981, to Hon. Richard C. White

Taft, William H., IV, General Counsel, Department of Defense, letters to:
Hon. John Tower, dated April 24, 1981..
Hon. William J. Hughes, dated June 3, 1981.
Subcommittee on Crime, dated July 13, 1981

Walker, John M., Jr., Assistant Secretary-Designate,
Treasury, letter dated July 28, 1981, to Hon. Sam Nunn

Department of the

Zeese, Kevin, legal director, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, letter dated May 27, 1981, to Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed]

POSSE COMITATUS ACT

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 1981

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME,
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,
Washington, D.C.

The subcommittee met, at 1:05 p.m., in room 2141, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Willliam J. Hughes (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

Present: Representatives Hughes, Fish, and Sawyer.

Staff present: Hayden Gregory, counsel; David Beier, assistant counsel; Deborah Owen, associate counsel; and Phyllis Henderson and Demitra Delaney, secretaries.

Mr. HUGHES. The meeting of the Subcommittee on Crime of the House Judiciary Committee will come to order.

This afternoon the Subcommittee on Crime will conduct a hearing on section 908 of H.R. 3519, the Defense Department authorization bill. The provisions of section 908 were offered by my distinguished colleague from Florida, Charles Bennett. The Bennett amendment was designed to enhance the capacity of Federal law enforcement authorities to combat the growing drug problem in the United States.

Section 908 of the DOD authorization bill contains five separate proposed amendments to title 10. The net effect of the Bennett amendment is to amend the Posse Comitatus Act. The Posse Comitatus Act, which is codified in section 1385 of title 18, provides that the Army and Air Force may not be used as a posse to enforce or execute the civilian laws. The proposed sections of title 10 would have the following effect:

One, the military would be authorized to share intelligence information with State, local, or Federal law enforcement authorities. Two, the military would be authorized to make available equipment or facilities to State, local, or Federal law enforcement officials.

Three, the military would be authorized to provide training assistance to State, local, or Federal law enforcement authorities. Four, the Secretary of Defense would be authorized to promulgate regulations to provide for reimbursement for the aforementioned assistance.

And finally, the military would be authorized to use its personnel to assist in the seizure of violators of the drug laws under certain circumstances.

The purpose of the hearing this morning is to assess the proposed amendments. I share the deep concern of my congressional col

« AnteriorContinuar »