Deceptive Programming Practices: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session [on] Staging of Marihuana Broadcast: Pot Party at a University
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Special Subcommittee on Investigations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - 364 páginas
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
answer apartment appear asked attend attorney authority believe broadcast Brown called campus Chairman Chicago Commission committee Communications concerning Congress conversation copy correct counsel course crime DINGELL discussion Evanston evidence fact Federal FELDINGER FERRANTE film further GINSBURG give given going GUERIN HARRIS hearing House indicated individual inquiry interest interview investigation involved KEITH KELLY KENEFICK knowledge letter LISHMAN manager marihuana matter mean meeting MINow Missett MORRONE Moss Northwestern University November operations participants person police possible pot party present prior question reason recall received record referred regard relating Representatives request response ROGERS script smoking Special SPECTOR staff staged STANTON statement station subcommittee suggest sure taken talked television tell testimony thing tion told took trying understand violation WBBM-TV week witness
Página 26 - Board, on the ground that the testimony or evidence required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture; but no individual shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for...
Página 27 - No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing documentary evidence before the commission or in obedience to the subpoena of the commission on the ground or for the reason that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him may tend to criminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture.
Página 27 - ... to produce documentary evidence if so ordered, or to give evidence touching the matter in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.
Página 28 - Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises...
Página 30 - Commission is affirmed, the court shall thereupon issue its own order commanding obedience to the terms of such order of the Commission. 1f either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding before the Commission...
Página 27 - Any of the district courts of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such inquiry is carried on...
Página 27 - Witnesses summoned before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in the courts of the United States.
Página 20 - A legislative body cannot legislate wisely or effectively in the absence of information respecting the conditions which the legislation is intended to affect or change ; and where the legislative body does not itself possess the requisite information — which not infrequently is true — recourse must be had to others who do possess it.