INDEX

ADJUSTMENT BOARD. See Labor, 7.

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES. See Constitutional Law, IV;
Equity, 1.

1. Administrative Regulations. Weight of administrative con-
struction in judicial interpretation. Bowles v. Seminole Rock Co.,
410.

2. Administrative Decisions. Weight accorded rulings of Ad-
ministrator of Wage and Hour Division. Jewell Ridge Corp. v.
Local, 161.

ADMISSION TO BAR. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 1.
ALABAMA LABOR LAW. See Constitutional Law, I, 5; Labor, 8.
ALIMONY. See Divorce, 2.

ALL-WRITS ACT. See Jurisdiction, II, 4–5.

ANTITRUST ACTS. See Jurisdiction, II, 4-5; IV, 1.

1. Sherman Act. Labor Unions. Combination of labor union
with non-labor group to restrain competition and monopolize
marketing of goods in interstate commerce, violated Sherman Act;
Clayton and Norris-LaGuardia Acts no defense; scope of injunc-
tion. Allen Bradley Co. v. Union, 797.

2. Id. Refusal of members of union to accept employment by
interstate carrier not violation of Sherman Act, though carrier
forced out of business. Hunt v. Crumboch, 821.

3. Sherman Act. Export Associations. Exercise by Federal
Trade Commission of powers under Webb-Pomerene Act not pre-
requisite to suit by United States to restrain violation of Sherman
Act by export association. U. S. Alkali Assn. v. U. S., 196.

4. Procedure. Preliminary Injunction. When unauthorized.
De Beers Mines v. U. S., 212.

APPLICATION. See Patents for Inventions, 1.

APPORTIONMENT. See Decree; Waters.

ARIZONA TRAIN LIMIT LAW. See Constitutional Law, II.

ARMED FORCES. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 1; Criminal

Law, 3.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

3. Id. That litigant had no opportunity to submit testa
of legislators as to intent of Act in suit, not denial of due pros
Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 304.

4. Statutes of Limitations. Validity of statute abo
fense of limitations. Chase Securities Corp. v. Donation, 34
5. Criminal Cases. Punishment of person for set 25
though ignorant of facts making it so, not denial of de pres
Williams v. North Carolina, 226.

6. Id. Manner in which court was organized denied no me
stitutional right of defendant. Akins v. Teras, 398.

7. Id. Racial discrimination in selection of grand jury r
established though but one Negro on panel. Akins v. Teza?
8. Id. Query as to validity of proportional limitation of
according to race. Id.

(B) Equal Protection Clause.

1. Classification. Labor Organizations. Alabama la
lating labor unions did not deny equal protection though
cable to business associations and organizations subject to P
Labor Act. Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 450.

2. Foreign Corporations. Taxation. Validity of taxing i
corporation differently than domestic corporation. Lincon à
Co. v. Read, 673.

3. Statutes of Limitations. Statute abolishing defense of
tations did not deny equal protection of laws. Chase Secur
Corp. v. Donaldson, 304.

4. Criminal Cases. Racial discrimination in selection of
jury not established though but one Negro on panel. A
Texas, 398.

5. Id. Query as to validity of proportional limitation of jur
according to race. Id.

CONTRACTS. See Labor, 2-3; Taxation, I, 3.

CONTROVERSY. See Constitutional Law, I, 1; Jurisdiction, I, P
CORPORATIONS. See Taxation, I, 1.

1. Foreign Corporations. Taration. Differentiation in taust
of foreign and domestic corporations. Lincoln Ins. Co. v. Rea
673.

2. Rights of Stockholders. Stockholder as "person aggrieve
and entitled to review of S. E. C. order under Public Utility H
ing Company Act; right of stockholder not dependent on whethe
proceeding has character of derivative suit. American Power C
v. S. E. C., 385.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

V. Fourteenth Amendment.

(A) Due Process Clause, p. 903.

(B) Equal Protection Clause, p. 904.

I. In General.

1. Judicial Power. Extent. Proceeding as one involving case
or controversy. In re Summers, 561.

2. Treason. Overt Act. Aid and comfort to enemy; sufficiency
of overt act; scope of two-witness rule. Cramer v. U. S., 1.

3. Full Faith and Credit. Divorce. North Carolina convictions
of bigamous cohabitation not invalid as denial of full faith and
credit to Nevada divorce decrees. Williams v. North Carolina, 226.

4. Id. Pennsylvania decree for support of wife not denial of
full faith and credit to husband's Nevada divorce decree. Esen-
wein v. Commonwealth, 279.

5. Regulation of Labor Unions. Constitutionality of Bradford
Act of Alabama. Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 450; C. I. O. v.
McAdory, 472.

6. Constitutionality of Statute. Who may challenge. Federa-
tion of Labor v. McAdory, 450.

7. Id. Unnecessary decision as to constitutionality avoided.
Id.

8. Id. Court will not decide question of constitutionality of
legislation in suit which is not adversary. C. I. O. v. McAdory, 472.
II. Commerce Clause.

Interstate Commerce. State Regulation. Arizona statute
limiting freight trains to 70 cars and passenger trains to 14 cars,
invalid as applied to interstate trains. Southern Pacific Co. v.
Arizona. 761.

III. First Amendment.

Religious Freedom. See In re Summers, 561.

IV. Fifth Amendment.

Due Process. Administrative Proceedings. Hearing. Pro-
cedure before Labor Board as satisfying requirements of due
process; adequate hearing before final order becomes effective
sufficient. Inland Empire Council v. Millis, 697.

V. Fourteenth Amendment.

(A) Due Process Clause.

1. Liberty. Religious Freedom. Denial of admission to prac-
tice law on ground of applicant's conscientious scruples against
serving in state militia in wartime, valid. In re Summers, 561.

2. Notice and Hearing. Claim of denial of opportunity to be
heard not supported by record. Esenwein v. Commonwealth, 279.

664818°-46- -61

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

3. Id. That litigant had no opportunity to submit testimony
of legislators as to intent of Act in suit, not denial of due process.
Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 304.

4. Statutes of Limitations. Validity of statute abolishing de-
fense of limitations. Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 304.

5. Criminal Cases. Punishment of person for act as crime
though ignorant of facts making it so, not denial of due process.
Williams v. North Carolina, 226.

6. Id. Manner in which court was organized denied no con-
stitutional right of defendant. Akins v. Texas, 398.

7. Id. Racial discrimination in selection of grand jury not
established though but one Negro on panel. Akins v. Texas, 398.
8. Id. Query as to validity of proportional limitation of jurors
according to race. Id.

(B) Equal Protection Clause.

1. Classification. Labor Organizations. Alabama law regu-
lating labor unions did not deny equal protection though inappli-
cable to business associations and organizations subject to Railway
Labor Act. Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 450.

2. Foreign Corporations. Taxation. Validity of taxing foreign
corporation differently than domestic corporation. Lincoln Ins.
Co. v. Read, 673.

3. Statutes of Limitations. Statute abolishing defense of limi-
tations did not deny equal protection of laws. Chase Securities
Corp. v. Donaldson, 304.

4. Criminal Cases. Racial discrimination in selection of grand
jury not established though but one Negro on panel. Akins v.
Texas, 398.

5. Id. Query as to validity of proportional limitation of jurors
according to race. Id.

CONTRACTS. See Labor, 2-3; Taxation, I, 3.

CONTROVERSY. See Constitutional Law, I, 1; Jurisdiction, I, 1–2.
CORPORATIONS. See Taxation, I, 1.

1. Foreign Corporations. Taxation.
of foreign and domestic corporations.

673.

Differentiation in taxation
Lincoln Ins. Co. v. Read,

2. Rights of Stockholders. Stockholder as "person aggrieved"
and entitled to review of S. E. C. order under Public Utility Hold-
ing Company Act; right of stockholder not dependent on whether
proceeding has character of derivative suit. American Power Co.
v. S. E. C., 385.