 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1856
...is the duty of courts judicially to know the general course of the transactions of human life, and whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction ; eg, the peculiar nature of lotteries, and the mode in which they are generally carried on. Salomon... | |
 | United States. Dept. of the Interior - 1867
...public history affecting the whole people," " public matters affecting the government of the country," " of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction," &c., &c., the courts jndicially take notice of without proof, and, "where the memory of the jndge is... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1868
...law would be that it should be threshed and delivered in a reasonable time. Courts will judicially take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. See 1 Greenl. Ev. p. 9. The courts will then judicially take notice of the time when the crops mature.... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1864
...railroad trains. The rule of law on this subject is well stated in 1 Greenl. Ev. § 6, as follows : " Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." In the cases above cited, it ought to be known by all persons who have anything to do with railroad... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1866 - 675 páginas
...the nature and extent of the jurisdiction of the inferior court whose judgment it revises.4 In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. In all these, and the like cases, where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Joel Tiffany - 1868
...resignation of a senator of the United States ; the appointment of a cabinet or foreign minister. " In fine, Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. In all these and the like cases, where the memory of the Judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents... | |
 | 1870
...v. Hoffman, 55 Barb., EVIDENCE. I. Judicial Notice. 1. Under the rule that courts will take judicial notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction, the courts of this State will take judicial notice, that the western portion of its territory was,... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1870
...OF THE STATE OF NETV YOKE, Appellant, v. ALONZO SJTYDEB, Respondent. • Courts will take judicial notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. And, accordingly, the courts of this State will take judicial notice, that the western portion of the... | |
 | Marcus Tullius Hun, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1875
...authority to sustain it. The furthest that the courts have ever gone in that direction, has been to take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction ; * and whether a certain street in a large city is likely to be deserted at nine o'clock in the evening,... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1876
...the nature and extent of the jurisdiction of the inferior court whose judgment it revises.4 In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction.6 In all these, and the like cases, where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts... | |
| |
Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. 
