Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF

CASES.

REPORTED, NOTED, ABSTRACTED AND DIGESTED.

258

299

418

220

Adarson v. Paterson.. Alexander y. McNear. Allen v. O'Donald Anglo Californa Bank v. Ames Application of Thirty-fourth street Ry, Co., In re. Archer v. State Arniel v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. Arnold v. Greene.. Aronson v. Fleckenstein. Atkins v. Sherbine.. Avery v. Creigh... Bains v. Syracuse, etc., R. C... Ballis v. Drake.. Baltimore & Y. Turnpike Co. v. Leonhardt. Bank for Savings in the City of New York v. Grace. Bank of America v. Shaw. Barber v. Abendroth.. Barnett v. Mayor, etc., of Paterson Barth v. Lines Bartholomew v. New York Cent. R. Co. Beadleston v. Beadleston Beardsley v. Selectmen of Bridgeport Beason y. Kurz. Beckett, In re Will of. Belden v. State Belleville Savings Bank v. Boruman Belter v. Lyon. Bentley v. Lamb. Best v. Flint.. Biddle v. Hestonville, In. & F. P. Ry. Co Bigelow Wire Works v. Sonel Binzel v. Grogan Blackburne v. Vigors.. Blair v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co. Blake v. Baldwin Bomberger v. Union Mutual Aid Society Borough of Carlisle v. Brisbane. Boston Rubber Co. v. Peerless Wringer Co. Bowen v. Webber Boyd v. Meigham. Brennan v. Merchants and Manufacturer's Bank Bridge v. City of Oshkosh. Bristol v. Bristol. Bristol Manf'g. Co. v. Barnes Bromley, Re. Bronson v. Estate of Phelps.. Brown v. Mausur. Brown v. Mansus. Brown v. Spaulding Brown v. Weaver Brock v. Dole. Brundage v. Village of Portchester. Bullard v. Boston and Maine Railroad. Butiz v. Northern Pacific R. Co.. Bunch v. Great Western Ry. Co. Burchett v. Commonwealth. Burns v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co Burr v. De La Vergne.. Burton v. Burton

298

15 455

58 516

Page.

Page. 373 Cogswell v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Ry. Co .. 471 297 Cole v. McKay..

404 299 Collins v. South Boston R. Co

293 92 Cominissioners of Excise v. Merchant.

395 54

Commissioners of State Reservation at Niagara, etc., In re... 195 50 Commonwealth v. Briant

440 517 Commonwealth v. Hall

439 Commonwealth v. Kostenbauder

277 193 Commonwealth v. Richardson.

18 76 Conselyea v. Blanchard. Converse v. Hobbs

415 Cook v. Prentice.

375

93 439 Corse v, Peck.

177 Corson, Appeal

464 257 County of Howard v. Kyte.

57 54 Crandall v. Grow

197 219 Crawford v. Rambo

86 73 Crisp v. Crisp...

299 456 Cummock v. Institution for Savings in Newburyport

208 139 Cushing's Will, Matter of..

97
475 Daniels v. Watertown Township

56 39 Darley Main Colliery Co. v. Mitchell

247 374 Davey v. Kelley.

357 416 Davis v. Gay

59 354 Davis v. Wabash, St. L. & P. R. Co..

293 138 Dawson v. Buford 178 Day v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.

479

117 17 Deimer v. Franz.

155 239 Dickinson v. State

316 138 Marston v. Marston 417 Dixon v. Allen.

57 519 Donk v. Alexander

137 431 Driggs v. Phillips.

415 317 Drovers Nat. Band of Union Stock Yards, III., v. AngloAmerican Packing and Provision Co..

106 Dunlap v. Thomas 507 Dupoyster v. Gagoni 237 Dwinelle v. Edey..

37 76 98 Eliot Five-cent Savings Bank v. Commercial Union Ass. Co. 118 140 Elliot v. Small

277 454 Emerson v. Cochran.

139 Engle v. Fischer

36 Eno v. Diefendorf

195 Ensign, In re

425 269 Equitable Co-operative Foundry Co. v. Hersee..

354 297 Evans v. Mason.

374 375 Everett v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.

77 55 Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co 138

77 37 Fanning v. D. M. Osborne & Co.

55 74 Farnham v. Pierce 386 Farrall v. Farnan.

297 515 Felton v. Chicago, etc.,Ry. Co Fergus v. Wilmaith

452

119 357 Fields v. Hartford, etc., Horse R. Co.. 518 Fifth Nat. Bank v. New York Elevated R. Co

°38

238 73 Fisher v. National Bank of New Jersey.

79 219 Fitzsimmons v. City of Brooklyn.. Fletcher v. People.

96 I 20 Folds v. Allardt

17 Follman v. City of Mankato.

358 148 Formwalt v. Hylton..

391

336 75 Flagg v. Town of Hudson. 518 Freeman y. Easley

279 178 French v. Creswell.

38 31 Fuller v. Connelly.

198 337 Fuller v. Lumbert

199 349

Gadsden v. Woodward 38 Gage v. Parry

397 515 Gallaher v. Herbert.

479

98 57 Gannon v. Wilson 219, 239 Gates v. Nellis.

238 158 Geismer v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern R. Co. 138 Gibbons v. Farwell..

150

497 53 Gille v. Hunt

158 220 Gould v. Eastern R. Co..

118

378 233 376

212

III

120

158

Cady v. Walker Camp v. Crocker Canning v. Farquhar Carbee v. Mason Carney v. Carney Carpenter v. Osborne. Caves, Torre Chapin v, Freeland. Chapin v. Wright. Cheney v. Dunlap. Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Londergan. Choctaw Nation v. United States Christopher v. Christopher.. Churchill v. Bradley Clark v. Sargeant Cleaver v. Bullock. Clute v. Knies.. Coburn v. Middlesex Co.

VOL. 34.

516

200

177

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

200

[ocr errors][merged small]

450 356 356 130 95 97 138

[ocr errors]

200

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

358

457

[ocr errors]

Page.

Page. Grand Lodge of the Independent Order of Good Templars of Massey v. Mutual Relief Soc. of Rochester, N. Y.

116 the State of California v. Farnham.

279 Maught v. Getzendanner Granger v. Parker

272 218 Mayor, etc., of New York v. Eden Musee. Green Bay and Mississippi Canai Co. v. Hewitt..

36 352

Mayor, etc., v. Second Avenue R. Co.. Griffin v: Long Island R. Co..

137 Memphis Bell Telephone Co. v. Hunt Griswold v. New York and N. E. R. Co..

239 13 Menacho v. Ward

44 Merchants' Union Barbed Wire Co. v. Rice

452 Hackney v. Welch. 335 Messenger's Appeal..

79 Haley v. Case.

191 Metropolitan Trust Co. v. Tonawanda Valley, etc., R. Co 439 Hall v. Westcott.. 227 Micklethewait v. Newlay Bridge Company, limited.

466 Hall v. Whitehall Water Power Co..

354
Miller v. Chapel

154 Hamilton v. State.

18
Millett v. People.

128 Hamilton v. Thames and Mersey Marine Ins. Co..

109 Miner v. Markham. Harbeck v. Harbeck.

304 97 Morgan v. City of Binghamton.

91 Harden Star Hand Grenade Fire Extinguisher, Limited Co., Moore v. Lambeth Water Works Company Re..

328 213 Moore v. Phænix Fire Insurance Co

369 Harper v. Shoppell...

374
Moores v. Tomshend..

95
Harper v. Young,
376 Morrison v. Morrison.

233 Hart v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

417 Morrison v. Porter. Hastings v. Weber.

197 Morey v. Sohier

39 Haynes v. Rudd. 54 Morrill v. Phillips

220 Hecksher v. Trotter.. 279 Moyer, Appeal of.

316 Henning v. Raymond.. 336 Muhlenbrinck v. Pooler

47 Hendricks v. Bd. of Co. Com’rs of Chautauqua County. 232 Mulcairns v. City of Jaynesville. Hess v. Muir

280 Mulligan v. Commonwealth Hewlett v. Elmer.

393

Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. Co. Hewlett v. Western Union Tel. Co

260 Murchie v. Gates Hickey v. Morrell.

68 Murray v. Beard Highland v. Dresser

Murtfeldt v. New York, W. S. & B. Ry. Co. Hinchliffe v. Shea.

397 Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of Montgomery Co. v. Dehaven Hoar v. Merritt.

156 House v. Eisenlord

73 Houson & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Carson

Nason v. West

38 219 Hoyt v. Ketcham

Neslie v. Second and Third streets Pass. Ry. Co 298

417 Hutchinson v. Parker.

Nevin v. Spieckeman.

56 377 Hutkoff v. Demorest.

New England Mortgage Securiety Co. v. Vader.

274 475

New Haven Horseshoe Nail Company v. Linden Spring Co. 175 Ikerd v. Beavers...

Newman v. Jones..

66
78
Nickerson v. English

277 Jacksonville, P. and M. R. Co. v. United States.

Noel's Ex'r, v. Gill

496 James v. City of Newton..

Norris v. Atkinson. 325

334 Jefferson, Matter of..

Norcross v. Griffiths 119

39

North v. State Jewell v. Gilbert.. 131

374 Jochem v. Robinson

North Hudson Co. R. Co. v. May

155 Johnson, In re, Petition of

Norton v. Cowell..

58 394 Johnson v. Barnes

Nugent v. Jacobs.. 451

355

Nutt v. Norton Jonas v. Hunt 198

139 Jones v. Farris.

454 Jones v. Low

259
Olive v. Whitney Marble Company

415 Jordan v. Westerman.

Ottoman Cahvey Co. v. City of Philadelphia

59

Owen v. Weston Kalbfleisch v. Long Island R. Co.

116 Kalis v. Shattuck

Paddock v. Kircham.

333 Kauffman v. Breckenridge.

158
Page v. Hodge

75 Kent v. Dunham.

147

Paige v. Warning. Kessinger v. Vanatta

Pandorf v. Hamilton.

155 Kidd v. Horry..

371

Pardee v. Markee. Kiff v. Weaver

Peck v. Clerk
Kinnick v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co

449
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Sanderson.

50g

People v. Anderson. L. & N., & G. S. R. Co. v. Katzenberger

215

People v. Arensberg -
Lakin v. Willamette Valley R. Co

77
People v. Chapman..

125 Landis v. Saxton..

People v. Clark 70

237 Lane's Appeal

People v. Com'rs. of Fire Department. 377

475 Lang v. Straus.

152
People v. Com. of Police

195 Langley v. Hill.

440
People v. Cromwell

88 Larned v. Briscoe.

199
People v. Cruger

95 Laughlin v. Street Ry, of Grand Rapids

134
People v. Druse

470 Lavender v. Atkins

People v. Gage

99 Lawrence v. Warwick.

09
People v. Gardner

155 Leeper v. Neagle..

People v. Jaehne

372 Lennig v. Ocean City Association.

99

People v. Laidlow Leonard v. Commonwealth

177, 195 People v. Loew

53 Lewis v. Adams

375

People v. McCarthy Lewiston Steam Mill Co. v. Androscoggin Water Power Co., 57 People v. McClave

73 Lichtenberg v. Herdíelder.

415

People v. Mondon. Liddy v. Long Island City.

195

People's Passenger Ry. Co. v. Lauderbach. Limmerland v. St. Paul, etc., R. Co.

237

People v. Rome, Watertown, etc., R. Co Lindroth v. Litchfield.

372 People v. Townsend.

64 Linnard, Appeal of

316

Perrine, Alleged Lunacy of, In re.
Little v. Giles.

295
479
Perry v. Mount Hope Iron Co.

298 Lombard v. Batchelder.

258, 358

Petition of the N. Y., L. E. & W.R. Co., etc., v. Bennett, Long v. Stafford.

In re.

415 Long v. Straus.

Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Frissel.

71 Lorillard v. Pride.

Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N. Y., Ex parte. Lyon v. Hersey

Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn v. Lamar.

49

Pierce v. Harrington..
M'Fadden v. Ross.

376
Place v. Norwich & New York Transp. Co..

24 McGinn v. Tobey

97

Plum v. Studebaker.. McGraw v. Whitson.

100 59

Poertner v. Poertner McKee v. Coffin..

259 Pope v. Porter McLeod v. Conn. & Pass. R. Co.

35 384 Post v. Kreischer McLewee v. Hall.

355 415

Potter v. Douglas County. Madeira, Appeal of

234 19

Potter v. Gronbeck Maguire v. Selden

415

Powers v. Canada Mahin v. Pfeiffer

155

Priest v. White Mansheld Machine Works v. Lowell Common Council 239

Providence Coad Co. v. Providence, etc., k. Co. Marion v. State

Pullen v. Pullen Mark v. Hudson River Bridge Co.

337 373 Pynchon v. Day. Market Nat. Bank v. Pacitic Nat. Bank.

35 Martin v. Carver's Adm'r. 240 Queenan v. Palmer..

118

98

216

393 488 140 498

II

156

476

416

40

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Page

[blocks in formation]

Page.

78 456 119 127 74 76 179 396 237 119 76

Raub v. Smith
Reading F. Ins. and Trust Co.'s Appeal.
Redinger v. Marquette & W. R. Co.
Reg. v. Lord Mayor of London..
Reilly v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co..
Reinhardt v. Borough of South Easton.
Rembe v. New York, O. & W. R. Co
Reynolds v. Ellis
Reynolds v. Hussey
Rich v. Crandall
Roberts v. Smith.
Robinson v. Bair.
Robinson v. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia
Robinson v. Konawha Valley Bank
Rodgers v. Highland
Rogers Halden
Root v. Merriam.
Rozell v. Andrews..

278

....

336

Teal v. Fissel
Temple v. Whitier.
Territory v. Blomberg -
The Oakland.
The Xantho
Thielen v. Richardson
Thomas v. Quartermaine.
Thomas v. Joslyn.
Thompson v. Libby
Thompson v. Minneapolis and St. L. Ry. Co..
Town of New Hartford v. Town of Canaan..
Town of Oregon v. Jennings
Towne v. Goldberg-
Traders and Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. Brown.
Trounstine v. Sellers...
Tucker v. People
Union Mill Co. v. Shores..
Union Nat. Bank v. Underhill
United States v. Tenney
United States v. Thomas.
Union Trust Company v. Rochester R. Co..

157 334

77 389 454 307 417 337 317 267 515 99

454 450 397 196

23

[blocks in formation]

356 196 18

418

55 253

75 178

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

418

Saginaw Gas-light Co. v. City of Saginaw.

412 Sampson v. Freedman..

35 Sanders v. Bromley.

379 Sanders v. Wheeburg.

107 Seive v. Stein reide.

480 Selliger v. Bastian.

335 Sensenig v. Perry

138 Schwartz v. Weber

477 Schwenck v. Naylor.

137 Schulz v. Sweeny.

120 Shamburg v. Abbott.

157 Shattuck v. Bill

16 Sheeley v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co.

178 Shenfield v. Nashawannuck Manuf. Co.

119 Shultz v. Mayor, etc., of New York

415 Siegrist v. Schmoltz.

455 Smith's Appeal.

497 Smith v. Memphis & A. C. Packet Co.

199 Smith v. Sherwood

119 Smith v. Smith.

156 Smith v. State.

453 Smith v. Swan Snyder, Matter of

394 Somerset Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Usaw

277 Sonneborn v. Libbey

177 Springer Transp. Co. v. Smith

258 Spinning v. Spinning

192 Stanchfield v. City of Newton

157 Stanhope v. Stanhope. State v. Archer

374 State v. Beaudet

7 Suate v. Clark

297 State v. Clarke

56 State v. Davis

424 State v. Hughes

439 State v. Jones.

317 State v. McDermott. State y. Smith. Staten Island, etc., R. Co. to Acquire Lands, Application of.: 415 Stevens v. Castel

454 Stevens v. Citizens' Ins. Co.

454 Stephens y. State.

228 Stevens y, State

37 Stewart v. Garrett. Stewart v. Long Island R. Co.

333 Stewart v. Schall.

98

220

230

Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Ry. Co. v. People of the State of Illinois

-406, 427 Wagner v. State

197 Wait v. Oxford.

452 Wallace v. Wallace.

454 Warren Glass Works Co. v. Keystone Coal Co.. Wasson v. First Nat. Bank.

311 Watt's Appeal.

155 Weatherhead v. Stoddard

280, 378 Wheeler v. Lawson.

373 White y. Western Assur, Co.

455 Whitney v. Butler

444 Wilcox v. St. Paul and N. P. Ry. Co

316 Wilds v. St. Louis, A. and T. H. R. Co..

54 Willett v. Rich.

240 Williams v. Flood.

494 Wilmerding v. McKesson. Wilson, Matter of Will of. Winchell v. Coney. Winchester v. Capron... Wing v. Ansonia Clock Co Wistar v. City of Philadelphia.

139 Wiswell v. Wiswell..

357 Witcomb v. Starkey

75 Witherell v. Stewart

373 Wood v. State

334 Wright v. Boston and Albany R. Co..

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

33 238

Zimmerman v. Township of Conemaugh.

118

THE ALBANY LAW JOURNAL:

A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE LAW AND THE LAWYERS.

The Albany

Albany Law Journal.

[ocr errors]

tracts from it. They sum up the chief causes in the following words: Complex procedure, inadequate

judiciary, procrastination, retrial, unreasonable apALBANY, JULY 3, 1886.

peals, uncertain law. The latter they propose to remedy by codification, which, curiously enough,

met with strenuous opposition among the members CURRENT TOPICS.

of the association, so much so that its discussion

was postponed to the present year." We fear that UDGE SEYMOUR D. THOMPSON, of St. Louis, the Times people are to be ranked among the "code

fellows." The New York City Bar Association Association, has addressed a circular to the members, ought to appoint and send a committee over to corasking their opinion on the following subjects: Codi- rect them. fication; trial by jury; relief of appellate courts; delays and uncertainties in administration of criminal In an article of the last number of the American law; legal education; the selection of judges; Law Review entitled “Hints about Trials,” Judge champertous engagements by attorneys. Many Brown of Detroit laments the prolixity of jury trials specific questions are asked under each head. in this country and contrasts it with the rapidity of Among the most interesting is the question whether them in England. He says very truly that " a case the State ought not to have the right to put the that ought to be finished in a day or two is dragged prisoner on the witness stand and interrogate him, on for a week.” Hours are wasted in taking testibut without the power of compelling answers; mony upon immaterial points, or in the unnecessary whether the prosecuting attorney ought not to be multiplication of witnesses to the same fact. Days allowed to comment on the prisoner's failure to tes- are consumed in examining plaintiff's witnesses tify where he has the right; whether judges should only to find that he has made no case

a fact be elected or appointed; for what term; and whether which ought to have been discovered when he made they should be re-eligible; whether the “contin- his opening to the jury. And finally, if the trial be gent fee business" is injurious to justice, and closely contested, the chances are that the jury will whether the defendant should be allowed to show disagree, or the verdict be set aside because an insuch an agreement if it exists. This circular is an- advertent question was asked, or a word was misticipatory of a report to the association at the next spelled in the indictment. The consequence of all meeting

this is that the judicial force of the country is out of

all proportion to the amount of work done, and the The London Law Times takes notice of the report cost to the public for jury fees and other court exof the eighth annual meeting of the American Bar penses is something enormous." He admits that Association; after stating that one of the professed the English celerity is somewhat offset by the diffiobjects of the association is to “

encourage cordial

culty of getting a case at issue there. He makes intercourse among the members of the American several suggestions for improvement. First, that Bar,” it observes: “It is with the latter, among after the plaintiff has opened, the defendant should other objects, we presume, that a 'collation,' fig- be required to state his case, so as to see if the ures in the programme of the meeting." It com- cause cannot be disposed of as a question of law, mends the style of the discussions, and particularly Second, that cumulative testimony should be exof Mr. Biddle's paper on the Proper mode of Trial. cluded. Third, that counsel should be required to It also observes: "Facile princeps, however, is the re- stand in examining witnesses. Fourth, that questions port of the special committee upon the delay of judi- of admission of testimony slıould not be discussed cial administration, bearing the honored names of much. Fifth, that counsel should be limited in David Dudley Field and John F. Dillon. It is in every time for argument. Eighth, that personalties should way excellent, but space forbids any copious cr- be prohibited. Ninth, that requests to charge

Vol. 34 No. 1.

« AnteriorContinuar »