 | Arnold D. McNair, H. Lauterpacht - 1932 - 642 páginas
...upon the independence of States cannot therefore be ' presumed " (at p. 18). Case No. 98 contd. must not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. But from that it does not follow that international law prohibits a State from exercising jurisdiction... | |
 | C. Neale Ronning - 1965 - 242 páginas
...law, clearly put forth in the Lotus Case and the Colombian-Peruvian Asylum Case, respectively. Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction is certainly territorial; it cannot be exercised by a state outside its... | |
 | Naval War College (U.S.) - 1965
...Mercier and Donnedieu de Vabres; Article 34, Restatement, Foreign Relations Law, p. 96. •• "Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction is certainly territorial; it cannot be exercised by a State outside its... | |
 | Roland J. Stanger, Naval War College (U.S.) - 1965 - 401 páginas
...Fusinato, Mercier and Donnedieu de Vabres; Article 34, Restatement, Foreign Relations Law, p. 96. ""Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that—failing the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary—it may not exercise its power in... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht - 1968 - 538 páginas
...sovereignty." The view based on these two grounds was expressed in the following terms (p. 18, 19) : " Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction is certainly territorial; it cannot be exercised by a State outside its... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Ha - 1968 - 400 páginas
...International Law, 1928, p. 867 sq. 2. 7 Cranch, 116. 3. Souveraineté et Liberté (Paris 1922), p. 80. "state is that, failing the existence of a permissive...power in any form in the "territory of another state 1." This dictum quite naturally leads to a discussion of the doctrine of intervention as an exception... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Ha - 1967 - 672 páginas
...contrary to both the letter and the spirit of the World Court's injunction in the Lotus case, that a State "may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State". That this is so was to some extent recognized in the modified Judgment entered, after negotiations... | |
 | 1972 - 558 páginas
...it. The international limitation upon enforcement jurisdiction was described by the Permanent Court: "The first and foremost restriction imposed by international...its power in any form in the territory of another State",29 and by its successor, more generally: "Between independent States respect for territorial... | |
 | Sami Shubber - 1973 - 369 páginas
...PCIJ in the Lotus case (1927): "Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law is that — failing the existence of a permissive...power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction is certainly territorial; it cannot be exercised by a State outside its... | |
| |
Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that — failing the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. 
