...held that the effect of the Wilson act was to "divest them [objects of Inter-state commerce shipments] of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case," to wit, after the object had 'reached Its destination. It fell under the control of state legislation,...

...propAerty in the country or State. 12 Wheat. 448. No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject, have arisen, not from a denial of the power of Congress, when exercised, but...

...property in the country or State. 12 Wheat. 448. No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject, have arisen, not from a denial of the power of Congress, when exercised, but...

...the country or State. 12 Wheat. 448. No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide Ithat certain designated subjects of interstate commerce...which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject, have arisen, not from a denial of the power of Congress, when exercised, but...

...mass of property in the country or state. The court could see no reason why if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...competency to do so. The differences of opinion which have arisen in the court upon this subject have been not from a denial of the power of Congress, when exercised,...

...trade and commerce. Again, in Wilkerson v. Rahrer it was ruled that the same power of Congress may provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...which divests them of that character at an earlier time than would otherwise be the case. " Liquors transported into Kansas fell at once upon arrival...

...8. ; p. 869, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. ; 35 L. ed., 572): No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so. As early as the decision of Brown v. Maryland (12 Wheat. , 419 ; 6 L. ed. , 678), it was held that...

...Rahrer, 140 US 545, 552, that the act of Congress "divests them (objects of interstate commerce shipment) of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case." We think that interpreting the statute by the light of all its provisions, it was not intended to and...

...JSahrer, 140 US 545, 552, that the act of Congress "divests them (objects of interstate commerce shipment) of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case." We think that interpreting the statute by the light of all its provisions, it was not intended to and...

...with the mass of property in the country or state. No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...case, it is not within its competency to do so." The act of Congress is valid. The original laws of Kansas became operative in respect to imported packages...