Weight used in determining charges on shipments of Michigan pulpwood from Ashland to Peshtigo, Wis., based on estimated weight under agreement with consignee was not unreasonable. Id. (228-231).

Cancelation of tariff rules providing for weight agreements in connection with movement of pulpwood in place of actual weight was not justified. Scales for weighing were not always available and the weight agreement resulted in more expeditious handling of the traffic, less expense to the carrier, and in an adjustment satisfactory to all concerned. Id. (230).

Rules, regulations, and practices governing estimated weights of broccoli from California to eastern destinations were not unreasonable but were unduly prejudicial to the extent that the estimated weights thereunder exceeded estimated weights under like rules, regulations, and practices from Texas. D'Arrigo Bros.

Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 741.

WORDS AND PHRASES

"Intermediate to and in the direction of": Neely Oil Co. v. Alton R. Co., 343

(346).

"Lehigh Private Siding": Greenspan Bros., Inc., v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 301 (302).

"Persons": Propriety of Operating Practices-New York Warehousing, 134 (200).

"Rate territory": Seavey & Flarsheim Brokerage Co. v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co., 325 (326).

"Same direction": Parkersburg Rig & Reel Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 709 (714).

"Stearine": A. Gross & Co. v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 397 (399).

"Transportation": Propriety of Operating Practices-New York Warehousing, 134 (194).

198 I.C.C.