Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States, Volumen198

Portada

Dentro del libro

Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario

No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.

Contenido

Texas Southwestern Cattle Raisers Assn et al v
73
Smith Bros Mfg Co v Aberdeen R R Co 181 I C C 137 406
96
Interstate Commerce Commission v Cincinnati N O T
102
Morrell Co v New York Central R Co 104 I C C 104
104
Los Angeles Union Stock Yards Co o Los Angeles S L
110
Routing Grain and Grain Products via Chicago R I
117
Sinclair Crude Oil Co 0 Atchison T S F Ry Co
126
El Paso Freight Bureau v Atchison T S F Ry Co 478
134
Mackman 24 Mich 279 8
154
Magnolia Petroleum Co 0 Atchison T S F Ry Co
157
Majestic Coal Mining Co o Atchison T S F Ry Co
163
Mangelsdorf Seed Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
179
American Cigar Box Lbr Co v Norfolk W Ry Co
182
Maricopa Packing Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
195
Southern Pacific Term Co v Interstate Commerce Commis
197
Co 721
200
Arcade Attica R Corp Atlantic Coast Line R Co V 375
208
Atchison T S F Ry Co v United States 279 U S 768
209
Wichita Chamber of Commerce v Abilene S Ry Co
223
Chicago N W Ry Co American Field Seed Co v 205
225
Cushwa Sons v Arcade A R Corp 185 I C C 280
234
Arkansas Valley Interurban Ry Co J S Cosden Inc V
237
Chicago B Q R Co Northwest States Utilities Co v 557
241
Coal Rates from Illinois Mines to Omaha 34 I C C 623
244
Alton E R Co 181 I C C 599
245
American Cyanamid Co v Ann Arbor R Co 179 I C C 139 637
250
Missouri Pac R Co A B Cole Sons v
252
A Gross Co v Lehigh Valley R Co et al 397
262
Capitol Fuel Co v Norfolk W Ry Co 188 I C C 555 746
269
Armour Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 73
273
Baltimore Coal Exc v Baltimore O R Co 196 I C C 15 508 518
276
Armour Fertilizer Works v Central R Co of N J et al 483
283
Dawes Dry Milk Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 178
306
Morrell Co v Beaumont S L W Ry Co
307
Southeastern and Carolina Territories 163 I C C 319
319
Rope and Twine in the South
320
Southern Traffic Assn v Erie R Co 176 I C C 399
328
Carolina Shippers Assn v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 177
329
Expenses or Revenues Practices of Carriers Affecting Operat
337
Chicago Live Stock Exc v Alton R Co 73
339
Mosbacher Motor Co v Alton S R 408
343
Midcontinent Oil Rates 36 I C C 109 528
344
Asphalt Rock and Limestone in the Southwest
355
Atchison T S F Ry Co Anderson Oil Co v 525
365
Rate Structure InvestigationPart 3 Cotton 174 I C C 9
366
Sugar Cases of 1933 195 I C C 127 and supplemental reports
368
Divisions of Freight Rates 148 I C C 457 156 I C C 94
376
Refined Petroleum Products in the Southwest 171 I C C 381
381
RobinsonRansbottom Pottery Co v New York Central
392
A J Harwi Hardware Co v Alton R Co
408
Ostenberg Motor Co v Alton R Co 190 I C C 578
411
Coffee fromGalveston and Other Gulf Ports 58 I C C
423
Intrastate Rates on Bituminous Coal in Illinois 182 I C C 537
425
Iron and Steel Articles 155 I C C 517 161 I C C 386 161
432
Otis Gin Warehouse Co v Gulf C S F Ry Co 172
438
Y Ry Co Chamber of Commerce of Fargo
439
Joseph B Marcus Co v Chicago M St P P R Co
455
Fourth Section Applications 542 et seq 25 I C C 50 768
503
New Florence Fire Brick Co v Alton E R Co 531
504
Wilmington Chamber of Commerce Del on behalf of Wil
507
Anthracite Coal Investigation 101 I C C 363
511
Selby Shoe Co v Baltimore 0 R Co 275
531
Carter Oil Co v Chicago B Q R Co 96 I C C 215 567
538
Leases and Grants by Carriers to Shippers 73 I C C 671 198
542
Livestock Traffic Assn v Abilene S Ry Co 177 I C C 180
553
Duluth Chamber of Commerce v Chicago N W Ry Co
554
Commercial Club Salt Lake City v Atchison T S F
560
Central Pennsylvania Coal Producers Assn v Baltimore 0
574
I C C 5 403
582
General Rate Level Investigation 1933 195 I C C 5 516
602
Alabama V Ry Co Birmingham Sash Door Co v 665
606
Frank J Dutra v Southern Pac Co 353
635
Grain and Grain Products 161 I C C 709 121
643
Duplication of Produce Terminals 188 I C C 323 201
646
Southwestern Rates 185 I C C 7
665
White Eagle Oil Corp v Big Fork International Falls
667
Norfolk W Ry Co Atmospheric Nitrogen Corp v 309
673
Container Service 173 I C C 377 676 696
676
BigelowHartford Carpet Co v New York N H H R Co
679
Shelbina Milling Co v Chicago B Q R Co 241
680
F S Royster Guano Co v Baltimore 0 R Co 483
683
Bituminous Coal to Youngstown 197 I C C 617
696
Apples and Pears from Oregon and Washington 181 I C C
698
Pacific Coast Fourth Section Applications 190 I C C 273
700
J S Cosden Inc v Arkansas Valley Interurban Ry Co 237
701
Cottonseed Its Products and Related Articles 188 I C C 605
706
Arizona Grocery Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 284 U
709
Rumble Wensel Co v Director General 62 I C C 110
714
Moerschel Co v Alton E R Co 531
721
Arizona Packing Co v Arizona E R Co 81 I C C 115
729
Chicago R I P Ry Co John B Busch Brewing Co
737
KansasNebraska Fertilizer Co v Alton R Co 408
745
OhioMichigan Coal Cases 80 I C C 663
746
Permutit Co v Central R Co of N J 144 I C C 83 67
748
J Watson Distributing Storage Co v Alton R Co 408
756
Eastern ClassRate Investigation 164 I C C 314 263 484 499
759
CoveyBallard Motor Co v Alton S R 174 I C C 674 563
767
Phosphate Rock and Related Commodities 174 I C C 373
776
Chamber of Comm of Grand Junction v Aberdeen R
786
Elk River Concrete Prod Co v Chicago M St P P
789
Miner Lbr Co o Pennsylvania R Co 161 I C C 801 748
801
Table of localities
807
Index digest
821
Oneal Comm Co v Alabama G S R Co 194 I C C 596 662
822
Borden Brick Tile Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 198
824
Oregon Short Line R Co Cudahy Farm Operating Co v 413
825
George Thompson v Baltimore 0 R Co 540
834
Chicago W I R Co 29 Val Rep 1 17
836
Alton S R E H Milton Sons v 531
860
Smith Coal Co v Erie R Co 573
862
PanhandleEastern Pipe Line Co v Alton R Co 356
874
Portland Bridge Co v OregonW R Nav Co 272
882
Prairie Pipe Line Co v Arkansas W Ry Co 132 I C C
888

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Pasajes populares

Página xxvii - A public utility is entitled to such rates as will permit it to earn a return on the value of the property which it employs for the convenience of the public equal to that generally being made at the same time and in the same general part of the country on investments in other business undertakings which are attended by corresponding risks and uncertainties...
Página xxx - What the company is entitled to demand, in order that it may have just compensation, is a fair return upon the reasonable value of the property at the time it is being used for the public.
Página 515 - In the exercise of its power to prescribe just and reasonable rates the Commission shall give due consideration, among other factors, to the effect of rates on the movement of traffic...
Página xxvii - What will constitute a fair return in a given case is not capable of exact mathematical demonstration. It is a matter more or less of approximation about which conclusions may differ. The court in the discharge of its constitutional duty on the issue of confiscation must determine the amount to the best of its ability in the exercise of a fair, enlightened and "independent judgment as to both law and facts.
Página 10 - That there is an element of value in an assembled and established plant, doing business and earning money, over one not thus advanced, is self-evident. This element of value is a property right, and should be considered in determining the value of the property, upon which the owner has a right to make a fair return when the same is privately owned although dedicated to public use.
Página 27 - Act to charge or receive any greater compensation in the aggregate for the transportation of passengers, or of like kind of property, for a shorter than for a longer distance over the same line or route in the same direction, the shorter being included within the longer distance, or to charge any greater compensation as a through rate than the aggregate of the intermediate rates subject to the provisions of this Act...
Página xxxi - The ascertainment of that value is not controlled by artificial rules. It is not a matter of formulas, but there must be a reasonable judgment, having its basis in a proper consideration of all relevant facts.
Página xxvii - The return should be reasonably sufficient to assure confidence in the financial soundness of the utility and should be adequate, under efficient and economical management, to maintain and support its credit and enable it to raise the money necessary for the proper discharge of its public duties.
Página 82 - ... transportation, can make the mere ownership of the goods the test of the duty to carry, or, what is equivalent, may discriminate in fixing the charge for carriage, not upon any difference inhering in the goods or in the cost of the service rendered in transporting them, but upon the mere circumstance that the shipper is or is not the real owner of the goods, is so in conflict with the obvious and elementary duty resting upon a carrier and so destructive of the rights of shippers as to demonstrate...
Página 848 - shall include cars and other vehicles and all instrumentalities and facilities of shipment or carriage, irrespective of ownership or of any contract, express or implied, for the use thereof and all services in connection with the receipt, delivery, elevation, and transfer in transit, ventilation, refrigeration or icing, storage, and handling of property transported...

Información bibliográfica