Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 349. UNITED STATES v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. April 9, 1894: Stricken from the docket, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General, and it appearing that the United States were not parties to the suit in the court below. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. James Fentress for the Illinois Central Railroad Company, one of appellees.

No. 878. UNITED STATES ex rel. INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTING COMPANY V. ELKINS. Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. October 23, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, the cause having abated, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error. Mr. A. S. Worthington, Mr. W. W. Dudley and Mr. Michener for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for defendant in error.

No. 105. UNITED STATES ex rel. SHERWOOD v. WOODRUFF. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. October 11, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. F. W. Compton and Mr. Fabius M. Clarke for plaintiff in error. appearance for defendant in error.

No

No. 28. WALLACE v. MYERS. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. October 23, 1893: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. George K. French for appellee. Mr. Eugene H. Lewis for appellants. Mr. S. W. Rosendale and Mr. George K. French for appellee.

No. 184. WILKERSON V. RAHRER. Appeal from the Circuit. Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. De

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

cember 20, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. L. B. Kellogg for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 185. WILKERSON V. SICHER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. December 21, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. L. B. Kellogg for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 1059. WILLIAMS v. CLANCY. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. November 6, 1893: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. H. J. May for defendants in error. No one opposing.

No. 1079. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. February 1, 1894: Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Benjamin F. Tracy for plaintiff in error. Mr. Austen G. Fox for defendant in error.

No. 390. WOOD v. CORRY WATER WORKS COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. January 19, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellants. Mr. Samuel Dickson and Mr. Richard C. Dale for appellants. Mr. Johns Mc Cleave for appellees.

No. 1037. WUNDERLE v. WUNDERLE. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. October 10, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. William A. McKenney for plaintiffs in error. Mr. William A. McKenney for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Daniel D. Goodell for defendant in error.

No. 419. YEE AH SHEEN v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Dis

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

trict of California. October 23, 1893: Dismissed, on authority of counsel for appellant, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellee. Mr. E. B. Stonehill and Mr. William H. Lamar for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellee.

No. 325. YOUNG v. JACKSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 22, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Edwin H. Brown for appellants. Mr. George W. Brown, Jr., and Mr. Rollin M. Morgan for appellee.

No. 1109. YUNG SHEA v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. January 29, 1894: Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellee. No one opposing.

No. 145. ZIMMERMAN v. OLIVER. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. December 4, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. C. W. Ogden, Mr. S. M. Ellis and Mr. William A. McKenney for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME Court of THE UNITED STATES FOR OCTOBER TERM, 1893.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Number of cases on the appellate docket at the close of the October Term, 1892, not disposed of.

Number of cases docketed during October Term, 1893

[merged small][ocr errors]

Number of cases disposed of October Term, 1893

Number of cases remaining undisposed of, showing a reduc

[merged small][ocr errors]

10

3

7

934

280

1214

500

714

527

« AnteriorContinuar »